Conversation with CoinGecko CEO: Building a Crypto Data Platform from Scratch with $200, Regularly Evaluating Acquisition Intentions

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-15Actualizado a 2026-03-15

Resumen

Bobby Ong, co-founder and CEO of CoinGecko, built the cryptocurrency data platform from scratch with just $200 over 12 years, without venture capital. In a recent interview, he shared his journey into crypto in 2013, driven by an economics background and interest in Bitcoin's fixed supply and self-custody model. He remains optimistic about NFTs, viewing them as essential for tokenizing real-world assets, though he believes future crypto winners have yet to emerge. Ong discussed CoinGecko’s origins, including its name choice for being adaptable and fun, and highlighted the 2021 DeFi boom as a key growth driver, as the platform was early to track DeFi tokens. He explained the company’s decision to avoid VC funding, which fostered creativity and disciplined, low-cost marketing like SEO optimization. When comparing CoinGecko to competitor CoinMarketCap, Ong acknowledged CoinMarketCap’s stronger SEO due to earlier market entry but emphasized CoinGecko’s broader token coverage and data accuracy. He also addressed rumors about a potential $500 million sale, stating that while CoinGecko regularly evaluates strategic options, including acquisitions, there is no perfect timing for such decisions—it depends on the team and circumstances.

Source: When Shift Happens

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Bobby Ong is the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency data platform CoinGecko, which he built from scratch with $200 over 12 years without venture capital.

In the podcast, Bobby shared his personal experience and entrepreneurial journey, believing that CoinMarketCap's only advantage over CoinGecko is SEO, and responded to rumors of "selling at a $500 million valuation." The following are the highlights of the conversation.

Self-taught programming, entered the crypto field in 2013

Host: TM Lee was the CEO of CoinGecko for so many years. Why did you decide to swap roles with him?

Bobby Ong: Because both the crypto market and the company have reached a turning point. In the early days, it was like the "Wild West," but now large banks and institutions are entering, and the industry is changing for the better. Secondly, after 10 years of growth, CoinGecko has nearly 100 employees, and management direction requires leveraging different strengths. TM (former CEO) is a technical genius at heart. He now serves as president, focusing more on 0-to-1 R&D. I have taken over as CEO, responsible for the overall vision, operations, and direction, each playing to our strengths.

Host: What attracted you to the crypto field in 2013?

Bobby Ong: I have a background in economics. I studied economics at University College London, one of the best universities in the world for learning about money. I spent three years studying money, right after the big financial crisis. I was in university from 2009 to 2012, learning about bank runs, interest rate setting, federal deposit insurance, etc. However, after graduation, I saw the phenomenon of "negative interest rates" in reality, which shattered my understanding of textbook economics. So I quickly threw my university textbooks in the trash.

After graduation, I taught myself programming and spent a lot of time on tech forums. I learned about Bitcoin on the Hacker News forum. After reading the whitepaper, I tried to buy some Bitcoin. A few days later, the Bitcoin arrived, and I withdrew it to a self-custody wallet.

What really struck me at the time was: this is money I control myself. The money in your bank account isn't really yours; if the bank fails, your money is gone. What interested me more was Bitcoin's money supply: only 21 million coins, with a fixed supply. At that time, quantitative easing was happening, and the government was printing money to devalue the dollar. Who knows if the rules will change again in the future?

So the narrative of having hard money, digital gold, was very solid: the rules are written in stone and hard to change (unless everyone agrees). Also, in war-torn countries, many assets are real estate; you can't take them across the border, but Bitcoin can be carried in your pocket. For many people, this is a life-changing thing. Most of these traits still hold true today, even more so. So I think the foundation of cryptocurrency hasn't changed over the years.

Still bullish on NFTs, the big winners of future assets have yet to emerge

Host: What's the story with Pudgy Penguins?

Bobby Ong: One day I received an email saying they wanted me to invest in Pudgy Penguins. I am a big fan of NFTs. I had a call with Luca Netz and invested an amount. What I didn't know at the time was that Luca had been rejected by many VCs. I just wanted to support a fellow entrepreneur. He would be a winner in this space. I didn't know he faced so many challenges. For me, it was clear, but I guess not everyone had the same vision.

Host: What are your thoughts on NFTs in 2026?

Bobby Ong: Still bullish on NFTs. In this world of billions of tokens, a large portion will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Although NFTs seem to be in a downturn now, they will come back at some point. The vast majority of assets in the real world (such as real estate, contracts) are inherently non-fungible, and NFT technology is the inevitable choice for putting these assets on-chain.

Host: Who will be the winners of future asset appreciation?

Bobby Ong: I think it's something that hasn't appeared yet. Look at the tech industry: in 2000, you couldn't have imagined Uber or Airbnb. The Uber and Airbnb of crypto haven't arrived yet. Nowadays, companies grow to 1 billion users or $1 billion much faster than before. Old assets won't die; Bitcoin will always be around. But will Pudgy Penguins still be around in 5 years? Will CryptoPunks still be around? Who knows.

CryptoPunks is the first NFT series and may have historical artistic value. Pudgy Penguins ultimately depends on the team's execution. But there will always be new things in crypto, so you have to stay agile.

The DeFi explosion in 2021 was a turning point for the company

Host: Why the name CoinGecko? What was the early startup phase like?

Bobby Ong: In April 2014, I co-founded CoinGecko with TM Lee. At that time, crypto companies usually had very serious names like Coinbase or CoinDesk, but we wanted to use an animal name to add fun. We chose "Gecko" because geckos are adaptable, extremely fast, and widespread. We considered "CoinTeddy," but obviously, no one likes the bearish implication of "bear market."

In the first five years of the startup, to mitigate risk and fulfill a scholarship contract, I worked full-time in digital marketing until the crypto market exploded at the end of 2017, when I went full-time into CoinGecko. At that time, CoinGecko was extremely rudimentary, just a simple domain and basic server, scraping prices and social media data for a few hundred tokens, with almost no visual design.

Host: What was the turning point in development?

Bobby Ong: The turning point was the DeFi explosion in 2021. We did a lot that year, the most important being tracking the DeFi market. At that time, mainstream platforms didn't value long-tail assets on DEXs, while CoinGecko, by fully integrating on-chain data, tracked all DeFi tokens and gained a large number of users. At that time, CoinGecko was the only platform that could track these coins. We were ahead by 6-12 months, solidifying our position as the "go-to destination for crypto data."

No funding, forcing low-cost creative marketing

Host: Why not take VC money?

Bobby Ong: Early on, we talked to VCs, but no one really understood what cryptocurrency was, especially VCs here in Malaysia. Then we also went to the US. I talked to some people at Stanford and some in Silicon Valley, but they were a bit dismissive, thinking that making money from ads definitely wouldn't work. Well, if the Silicon Valley people themselves couldn't see it, there was nothing to be done. Of course, there must have been some VCs in Silicon Valley paying attention to this field.

We always kept operations lean. Bootstrapping was also interesting, like an experiment to see how far we could go without funding. I think not having financial resources was a creative constraint. It was a limitation we set for ourselves. The benefit was that no VCs forced us to spend at all costs to grow, but on the other hand, we had no cash.

So, how should we promote ourselves? How to do marketing? How to let the world know about CoinGecko without so much money? I couldn't go to conferences everywhere, sponsor parties, etc. I had to find low-cost, creative ways to promote us. This actually made our marketing team more disciplined. Optimizing search engine (SEO) was one important way we achieved growth at very low cost. Additionally, there were many other methods to help us grow quickly.

Host: What advice do you have on fundraising?

Bobby Ong: If you want to grow fast, go raise funds. But if you accept a slower pace of development, then you don't necessarily need to raise funds; you can develop at your own pace and control your own destiny. The benefit of not raising from VCs is that we never had to write any investor reports and didn't face any pressure from VCs.

If you need to grow fast or need to validate an idea, then raise funds. But it is advised to raise enough to reach a certain level and push the company to the next stage. However, raising too much money too early is not good because eventually, you will have too much money and lack discipline. You might have countless ways to squander the money, leading to over-hiring or doing all sorts of ridiculous things.

CoinMarketCap is strong in SEO, regularly evaluating investment choices

Host: How should users choose between CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: You need to understand the game rules of these two companies and how it affects users. We do what we think is good for the community and strive to provide users with the right data. Many users first discover CoinMarketCap through SEO, but after using it for a while, they find that CoinGecko's data is more accurate, covers more coins, and we have also started building Gecko Terminal, which includes even more coins, including all tokens on various DEXs on-chain. Many developers using our API also realize that reliability, accuracy, and uptime are stronger.

There are also subtle differences, like metadata, how we manage listings, how we check for updated information, etc. Ordinary users might not notice these, but industry insiders can immediately see the difference between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap and the work we do.

Host: Where is CoinMarketCap stronger than CoinGecko?

Bobby Ong: They are definitely stronger than us in SEO. They started 11 months earlier than us, and they got a lot of media coverage. Generally, media coverage brings a lot of backlinks, which helps improve SEO ranking. Then, when journalists want to write an article next time, they search for the token, find CoinMarketCap, and start writing. So they built a virtuous cycle. We have been trying to surpass them in SEO, but it's not easy. This is one of their advantages; they have a very strong position in the existing market.

Host: There have been recent rumors that CoinGecko might sell for $500 million. What are your thoughts on this?

Bobby Ong: CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and bootstrapped company. We often evaluate our strategic options, like whether to raise funds in the early stages. The discussion now might be slightly different because the industry is constantly changing. We are looking for opportunities, seeing what's on the market, seeing what choices there are, and then seeing how best to position CoinGecko to make it better, stronger, and provide the best products and services for our users and customers in the coming years. We don't comment on specific cases like this, but what I mean is, we regularly evaluate various options.

Host: When is the best time to sell?

Bobby Ong: There is never a so-called best time to sell. Timing also depends somewhat on luck. Ultimately, it depends on the co-founders, founders, or founding team, and what is right. And, ultimately, companies are acquired, not sold.

Related reading: CoinGecko seeks sale: The end of the era of independent crypto data

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the initial investment and funding strategy for CoinGecko, as shared by CEO Bobby Ong?

ABobby Ong started CoinGecko with an initial investment of $200 and built it over 12 years without any venture capital funding. The company has been self-funded and profitable, allowing it to operate independently and avoid external pressure from investors.

QAccording to Bobby Ong, what is the main advantage that CoinMarketCap has over CoinGecko?

ABobby Ong stated that CoinMarketCap's main advantage over CoinGecko is its superior Search Engine Optimization (SEO). They started 11 months earlier and received extensive media coverage, which generated many backlinks and helped them establish a strong position in search rankings.

QWhat does Bobby Ong identify as the turning point for CoinGecko's growth and why?

AThe turning point for CoinGecko was the DeFi explosion in 2021. CoinGecko was the first platform to comprehensively track DeFi tokens from various decentralized exchanges (DEXs), giving it a 6-12 month lead over competitors and solidifying its position as the go-to destination for crypto data.

QHow does Bobby Ong view the future of NFTs and which type of assets does he believe will be the big winners?

ABobby Ong remains bullish on NFTs, believing that a significant portion of the multi-billion token world will be non-fungible tokens (NFTs). He thinks the big winners in future asset appreciation have not yet emerged, comparing it to how tech giants like Uber and Airbnb were unknown in 2000, and emphasizes that the crypto space will continue to innovate with new projects.

QWhat is Bobby Ong's response to the rumor about CoinGecko potentially being sold for $500 million?

ABobby Ong did not confirm the specific rumor but stated that CoinGecko is a profitable, independent, and self-funded company. He mentioned that they regularly evaluate strategic options, including potential acquisitions, to position CoinGecko for future growth and better serve their users and clients, but they do not comment on specific cases.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

"STRC Falls Below $95: Why the Persistent Depegging and Is There Default Risk?" The article discusses the recent decline in the price of STRC, a perpetual preferred stock issued by Strategy (MSTR) designed to trade around a $100 par value. As of publication, STRC traded at $94.65, raising market concerns. STRC is described as a high-yield cash flow product, offering an 11.50% annual dividend paid monthly. Its "preferred" status grants it priority over common stock for dividends and in liquidation. Key reasons cited for the price depegging include: 1. **Bitcoin's Price Drop:** MSTR's assets are heavily tied to Bitcoin (BTC), which fell over 21% from its recent high, pressuring all Strategy-related products. 2. **Competitive Pressure:** Rival Strive Asset Management's similar product, SATA, offers daily dividends and has maintained its $100 par value with a ~13% yield. In response, Strategy has proposed changing STRC's dividend frequency from monthly to bi-weekly, pending shareholder vote. 3. **Technical Selling:** A break below $100 may have triggered algorithmic selling and stop-losses, exacerbating the decline. Regarding default risk, the analysis suggests it is currently low. Strategy founder Michael Saylor confirmed the June 2026 dividend rate remains at 11.50% with no cuts or suspensions. The company's massive reserve of 843,706 BTC provides a significant backstop for its obligations. Industry opinions are mixed. Some analysts view the BTC holdings as reliable support for dividends, while critics like Peter Schiff warn of potential dividend cuts leading to price crashes and lawsuits. Others highlight inflation risk and the company's ability to reduce dividends without a formal default. In summary, STRC's drop is attributed to BTC volatility, competition, and technical factors. While immediate default risk appears contained, the product faces challenges from market conditions and competitive dynamics.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

A sell-off in AI-related stocks, triggered by Broadcom's disappointing earnings forecast, sent shockwaves through global markets. South Korea's KOSPI led Asia's decline, plunging 1.8% as the risks from concentrated chip stock gains and surging leveraged investments came to the fore. The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.5% following Broadcom's 14% after-hours plunge, which signaled a slower-than-expected transition to AI clients. This pullback extended Wall Street's weakness, halting the S&P 500's nine-day rally amid hawkish Fed signals and renewed Middle East tensions. South Korean authorities convened an emergency meeting, pledging "immediate measures" against market volatility and warning of record-high stock margin debt. The adjustment rippled across assets: Bitcoin fell to around $64,000, its lowest since February, while safe-haven gold rose 1% on bargain hunting. Oil prices dipped on Middle East ceasefire news. Market analysts noted the sell-off was driven by profit-taking after massive gains, particularly in chip stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix, which now dominate the KOSPI. Wall Street banks are divided on Korea's outlook, with Goldman Sachs raising its target while Citigroup and others warn of overvaluation and a potential bubble. Bridgewater's Ray Dalio noted that great technological shifts often create bubbles. Meanwhile, Fed officials' hints at potential future rate hikes added to the cautious mood ahead of key U.S. jobs data.

华尔街日报Hace 31 min(s)

AI Trading Cools, South Korean Stocks Plunge 1.8%, Spot Gold Rises 1%, Bitcoin Dives

华尔街日报Hace 31 min(s)

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片