CLARITY Act misses March 1 deadline: What’s causing the holdup?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-03Last updated on 2026-03-03

Abstract

The CLARITY Act, aimed at regulating stablecoins, missed its March 1 deadline for a key agreement between banks and crypto companies. While the deadline was more a political tactic than a strict cutoff, negotiations continue with major disagreements remaining—particularly around whether crypto firms can offer rewards, APY, or staking benefits on stablecoin balances through backdoor methods like membership programs. Despite the delay, there is cautious optimism, with JPMorgan analysts predicting the bill could still pass by mid-2026 and end the current "regulation by enforcement" approach. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to review the bill again in late March. Market sentiment has been volatile, with Polymarket odds fluctuating sharply—from 72% to 42% in February, then rebounding to 73% in early March—reflecting high uncertainty. The outcome will significantly influence how the U.S. regulates crypto innovation and financial stability.

White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt had set the 1st of March as a deadline for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards.

When the date arrived, though, nothing was announced. No agreement. No clear update.

For many in the industry, that silence raised fresh doubts about whether the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act can move forward or if it will once again stall in the Congress.

CLARITY Act hangs in balance

Sources close to the talks say that the 1st of March deadline was not a strict legal cutoff. It was more of a political tactic to push both sides to compromise.

Negotiations are still happening. Banks and crypto firms are still debating the exact wording of the bill, especially around who controls stablecoin rewards.

Remarking on the same, the source said,

“Overindexing on March 1 is a mistake.”

The Senate Banking Committee is expected to take another look at the CLARITY Act soon. If lawmakers can resolve the remaining disagreements, the bill could finally move toward a full Senate vote.

However, another banking source acknowledged that banks and crypto firms still have key disagreements and have not yet reached full alignment on a deal.

“There’s agreement in-principle that stablecoin balances shouldn’t earn interest, but crypto firms are still trying to backdoor APY on balances through membership programs, rewards, and staking. I think that’s what’s holding up the deal right now.”

Optimism prevails

However, a recent report from JPMorgan Chase says the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026.

Analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year and finally end the current system of “regulation by enforcement,” where companies face legal action instead of clear rules.

With the Senate Banking Committee expected to review the bill again in late March, negotiators are under pressure to settle these issues.

The next few weeks could decide whether the CLARITY Act moves forward or faces another delay.

Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of the DeFi Education Fund, added,

“I think overall things are moving, and it feels like issues are being closed out, but DeFi has taken a backseat to the yield conversation. We’re waiting for Senate Banking to announce the next markup date and updated text, so I think everyone is anxiously awaiting to see what the next draft looks like.”

Are the odds rising or falling?

Earlier, crypto companies believed the GENIUS Act gave them some protection. They argued that even if stablecoin issuers like Circle could not offer rewards, third-party platforms such as Coinbase could.

However, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently pushed back. It suggested that third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law.

This move has made the legal situation more uncertain for crypto companies.

This uncertainty is also showing up in the markets. On Polymarket, the chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply on the 24th of February, from 72% to 42% in just one day.

Now, as March begins, the odds were around 56%, but then they spiked to 73% within hours.

That suggests the outcome is far from certain. The next Senate review will not only determine the fate of the bill but also influence how the U.S. balances financial stability with crypto innovation in the years ahead.


Final Summary

  • Banks fear deposit outflows and financial instability, while crypto firms argue rewards are essential for utility and competitiveness.
  • Market sentiment reflects this tension, with Polymarket odds swinging sharply on every development.

Related Questions

QWhat was the significance of the March 1st deadline set by Patrick Witt, and what was the outcome?

AThe March 1st deadline was set by White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt as a target for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards. It was not a strict legal cutoff but a political tactic to push for compromise. When the date arrived, no agreement or clear update was announced.

QAccording to sources, what is the primary disagreement currently holding up the CLARITY Act deal?

AThe primary disagreement is that while there is an in-principle agreement that stablecoin balances shouldn't earn traditional interest, crypto firms are attempting to offer similar yields through backdoor methods like membership programs, rewards, and staking. Banks are resisting this, and it is a key point of contention.

QWhat does JPMorgan Chase's report say about the potential impact and timeline of the CLARITY Act?

AA recent report from JPMorgan Chase states that the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026. Their analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year, which would end the current system of 'regulation by enforcement.'

QHow did the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently impact the negotiations?

AThe OCC recently pushed back against the argument that third-party platforms like Coinbase could offer rewards even if issuers like Circle could not. The OCC suggested that such third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law, creating more legal uncertainty for crypto companies.

QHow has market sentiment on the Polymarket platform reflected the uncertainty surrounding the bill's passage?

AMarket sentiment on Polymarket has been highly volatile, reflecting the uncertainty. The chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply from 72% to 42% on February 24th. As March began, the odds were around 56% but then spiked to 73% within hours, indicating that the outcome is far from certain.

Related Reads

Huang Renxun Dramatically 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market

In early June, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with the KOSPI index dropping over 5% and triggering a trading halt. Amid this volatility, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul provided a dramatic boost to market sentiment. During his trip, Huang held a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung. He announced that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU would utilize SK Hynix DRAM and confirmed a multi-year technical collaboration between the two companies. This partnership aims to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure roadmap, covering products from data center supercomputers to personal AI devices. Huang also publicly commented that AI company stocks were attractively priced. A key announcement was that NVIDIA's upcoming Vera Rubin AI supercomputer systems will use HBM4 memory, with supply qualifications granted to all three major suppliers: SK Hynix, Samsung Electronics, and Micron Technology. Despite this multi-sourcing strategy, Huang warned that the industry-wide chip shortage, affecting everything from wafers to packaging, is expected to persist for several years due to relentless demand from global AI factory construction. The collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix will employ NVIDIA's AI platforms and Omniverse digital twin technology to enhance its own semiconductor design, simulation, and manufacturing processes, aiming for more autonomous factory operations. This visit builds upon a prior October 2025 agreement for SK Group to build a large-scale AI data center using over 50,000 NVIDIA GPUs. Huang's itinerary also included meetings with other Korean giants like Hyundai, LG, and Samsung, indicating NVIDIA's broader strategy to deepen ties with South Korea's tech industry.

链捕手3h ago

Huang Renxun Dramatically 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market

链捕手3h ago

When Inference Becomes a Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value?

When Inference Becomes the Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value? The core AI bottleneck has shifted from model training to inference (runtime execution). While concerns persisted about an "AI compute gap"—initially a $200B, now a $600B problem—the market is now recognizing that the solution and value lie in the inference layer. Nvidia's financial restructuring around "serving tokens" and Cerebras's successful IPO highlight this shift. Inference is a recurring, usage-based cost, estimated to be 10-50x larger than the one-time training market, especially with the rise of agentic AI. The inference stack spans six layers: silicon (e.g., Nvidia), bare metal (e.g., CoreWeave), GPU rental/aggregation, deployment/optimization, model APIs, and end applications. Most companies operate in one layer. However, Hyperbolic uniquely spans three layers (GPU rental, deployment, and model APIs) without owning any hardware. It aggregates fragmented GPU supply from multiple cloud providers into a standardized pool, offering developers the cheapest available compute through intelligent routing. Its multi-cloud aggregation creates a data moat and a flywheel: more supply leads to better pricing data and liquidity, attracting more developers and providers. In contrast, applications like Venice operate at the top of the stack, reselling privacy-wrapped inference but remaining dependent on and constrained by the underlying compute costs they purchase. As inference demand explodes, value accrues not just to consumer applications but increasingly to the aggregation and routing layer that captures their cost of revenue. The coming potential GPU oversupply reinforces this dynamic. While hardware owners may suffer from depreciation, asset-light aggregators like Hyperbolic benefit from price arbitrage, routing workloads to the cheapest available capacity. The ultimate winner in the inference economy may not be the entity with the most GPUs, but the one that can most efficiently discover, aggregate, and route the world's fragmented compute.

链捕手3h ago

When Inference Becomes a Scarce Resource, Who Captures the Value?

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片