CLARITY Act misses March 1 deadline: What’s causing the holdup?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-03Last updated on 2026-03-03

Abstract

The CLARITY Act, aimed at regulating stablecoins, missed its March 1 deadline for a key agreement between banks and crypto companies. While the deadline was more a political tactic than a strict cutoff, negotiations continue with major disagreements remaining—particularly around whether crypto firms can offer rewards, APY, or staking benefits on stablecoin balances through backdoor methods like membership programs. Despite the delay, there is cautious optimism, with JPMorgan analysts predicting the bill could still pass by mid-2026 and end the current "regulation by enforcement" approach. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to review the bill again in late March. Market sentiment has been volatile, with Polymarket odds fluctuating sharply—from 72% to 42% in February, then rebounding to 73% in early March—reflecting high uncertainty. The outcome will significantly influence how the U.S. regulates crypto innovation and financial stability.

White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt had set the 1st of March as a deadline for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards.

When the date arrived, though, nothing was announced. No agreement. No clear update.

For many in the industry, that silence raised fresh doubts about whether the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act can move forward or if it will once again stall in the Congress.

CLARITY Act hangs in balance

Sources close to the talks say that the 1st of March deadline was not a strict legal cutoff. It was more of a political tactic to push both sides to compromise.

Negotiations are still happening. Banks and crypto firms are still debating the exact wording of the bill, especially around who controls stablecoin rewards.

Remarking on the same, the source said,

“Overindexing on March 1 is a mistake.”

The Senate Banking Committee is expected to take another look at the CLARITY Act soon. If lawmakers can resolve the remaining disagreements, the bill could finally move toward a full Senate vote.

However, another banking source acknowledged that banks and crypto firms still have key disagreements and have not yet reached full alignment on a deal.

“There’s agreement in-principle that stablecoin balances shouldn’t earn interest, but crypto firms are still trying to backdoor APY on balances through membership programs, rewards, and staking. I think that’s what’s holding up the deal right now.”

Optimism prevails

However, a recent report from JPMorgan Chase says the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026.

Analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year and finally end the current system of “regulation by enforcement,” where companies face legal action instead of clear rules.

With the Senate Banking Committee expected to review the bill again in late March, negotiators are under pressure to settle these issues.

The next few weeks could decide whether the CLARITY Act moves forward or faces another delay.

Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of the DeFi Education Fund, added,

“I think overall things are moving, and it feels like issues are being closed out, but DeFi has taken a backseat to the yield conversation. We’re waiting for Senate Banking to announce the next markup date and updated text, so I think everyone is anxiously awaiting to see what the next draft looks like.”

Are the odds rising or falling?

Earlier, crypto companies believed the GENIUS Act gave them some protection. They argued that even if stablecoin issuers like Circle could not offer rewards, third-party platforms such as Coinbase could.

However, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently pushed back. It suggested that third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law.

This move has made the legal situation more uncertain for crypto companies.

This uncertainty is also showing up in the markets. On Polymarket, the chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply on the 24th of February, from 72% to 42% in just one day.

Now, as March begins, the odds were around 56%, but then they spiked to 73% within hours.

That suggests the outcome is far from certain. The next Senate review will not only determine the fate of the bill but also influence how the U.S. balances financial stability with crypto innovation in the years ahead.


Final Summary

  • Banks fear deposit outflows and financial instability, while crypto firms argue rewards are essential for utility and competitiveness.
  • Market sentiment reflects this tension, with Polymarket odds swinging sharply on every development.

Related Questions

QWhat was the significance of the March 1st deadline set by Patrick Witt, and what was the outcome?

AThe March 1st deadline was set by White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt as a target for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards. It was not a strict legal cutoff but a political tactic to push for compromise. When the date arrived, no agreement or clear update was announced.

QAccording to sources, what is the primary disagreement currently holding up the CLARITY Act deal?

AThe primary disagreement is that while there is an in-principle agreement that stablecoin balances shouldn't earn traditional interest, crypto firms are attempting to offer similar yields through backdoor methods like membership programs, rewards, and staking. Banks are resisting this, and it is a key point of contention.

QWhat does JPMorgan Chase's report say about the potential impact and timeline of the CLARITY Act?

AA recent report from JPMorgan Chase states that the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026. Their analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year, which would end the current system of 'regulation by enforcement.'

QHow did the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently impact the negotiations?

AThe OCC recently pushed back against the argument that third-party platforms like Coinbase could offer rewards even if issuers like Circle could not. The OCC suggested that such third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law, creating more legal uncertainty for crypto companies.

QHow has market sentiment on the Polymarket platform reflected the uncertainty surrounding the bill's passage?

AMarket sentiment on Polymarket has been highly volatile, reflecting the uncertainty. The chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply from 72% to 42% on February 24th. As March began, the odds were around 56% but then spiked to 73% within hours, indicating that the outcome is far from certain.

Related Reads

Kicked Out of PayPal, Musk Aims for a Comeback in the Crypto Market

Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) has launched its "Smart Cashtags" feature, generating approximately $1 billion in trading volume within days of its April 2026 pilot launch. The feature allows users to click on stock or crypto tickers (or even full Solana token contract addresses) in posts to view real-time price charts and discussions without leaving the app. Initially available to iPhone users in the US and Canada, with a partnership in Canada enabling direct trading via the Wealthsimple app. This move is part of Musk's broader "Everything App" vision, spearheaded by the upcoming X Money platform. Analysts, such as Mizuho's Dan Dolev, see this as a potential disruptor to the US payments market, even prompting a downgrade of PayPal's stock. X Money's beta offers services like 6% APY on deposits, cashback, and P2P transfers, with speculation it may later incorporate crypto trading and stablecoin settlements for faster transactions. However, the ambitious plan faces significant regulatory scrutiny. Senator Elizabeth Warren has questioned the sustainability of the high 6% yield and raised concerns over X's banking partner, Cross River Bank, which has a history of regulatory violations. Additional risks involve the "GENIUS Act," which may create loopholes for stablecoin issuance without full FDIC insurance coverage, potentially leaving users unprotected. The integration of social trading on a platform with over 500 million users could inject new liquidity and retail interest into the crypto market. Yet, it also amplifies risks like herd mentality and the blurring of lines between entertainment and financial speculation. Musk's return to finance, after his ouster from PayPal, hinges on balancing innovation with regulatory compliance.

marsbit51m ago

Kicked Out of PayPal, Musk Aims for a Comeback in the Crypto Market

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片