China-Based Hacker Group Steals $7M in Crypto via Wallet Supply Chain Attacks

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-18Last updated on 2026-03-18

Abstract

A Chinese hacker group operating under the name Wuhan Anshun Technology has been accused of stealing approximately $7 million in cryptocurrency through supply-chain attacks targeting users of wallets like Trust Wallet. The group used malicious browser extensions and compromised Electron-based apps to collect wallet information and transfer funds, primarily on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum. Details emerged after an internal member leaked information due to disputes over profit sharing, releasing evidence and expressing intent to surrender to authorities. While the case remains unconfirmed by officials, it highlights significant security risks in crypto software. Experts advise caution when updating or installing wallet-related tools.

A Chinese hacker collective has been charged with stealing about $7 million in cryptocurrency by using supply-chain attacks to target users of cryptocurrency wallets. According to reports, the group claimed to be a security services provider while operating under the name Wuhan Anshun Technology. On the other hand, members were allegedly conducting illicit operations to pilfer cryptocurrency assets. Wallets like Trust Wallet and other platforms are thought to have been targeted by the attackers.

How the Group works

The group works by using malicious browser extensions and compromised Electron-based apps with remote access tools. They helped collect wallet information and transfer funds. It mainly targeted blockchains such as Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum.

The details of the operation came out after a member of the group leaked information. The person claimed there was a disagreement over profit sharing and unpaid compensation. After the disagreement, the individual reportedly released evidence of the operation and said they plan to surrender to authorities. Authorities have not officially confirmed the case, and no formal investigation details have been released so far.

This incident demonstrates that the software and tools used with the wallets are also risky. Experts advise exercising caution when updating software and refraining from installing unknown updates. The case highlights growing risks in crypto security, even though the claims have not yet been verified.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Juliana Stratton Defeats Crypto-Backed Krishnamoorthi in Illinois Senate Primary

TagsBlockchainchinaCryptocurrency

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the Chinese hacker group accused of stealing $7 million in cryptocurrency?

AThe group operated under the name Wuhan Anshun Technology.

QHow did the hacker group primarily carry out their attacks to steal cryptocurrency?

AThey used malicious browser extensions and compromised Electron-based apps with remote access tools.

QWhich specific blockchains were the main targets of this hacking group's attacks?

AThe group mainly targeted Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum.

QWhat event led to the public disclosure of the group's operation details?

AA member of the group leaked information due to a disagreement over profit sharing and unpaid compensation.

QWhat precautionary advice do experts give in light of this incident?

AExperts advise exercising caution when updating software and refraining from installing unknown updates.

Related Reads

Investor Confidence in Ozak AI Continues To Rise Despite Broader Uncertainty Across Crypto Markets

Despite broader crypto uncertainty with Bitcoin and Ethereum consolidating, Ozak AI ($OZ) continues to attract investor confidence, raising over $6 million in its presale. The project combines AI and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) to offer automation, prediction analytics, and scalable infrastructure. Key factors driving interest include its utility-focused approach, cross-chain support, staking mechanisms, and strategic partnerships with entities like SINT, Hive Intel, Pyth Network, and Dex3. These collaborations enhance data availability, liquidity, and execution capabilities. Priced at $0.014 in presale, Ozak AI’s tangible traction and long-term ecosystem potential position it strongly amid market volatility.

TheNewsCrypto12m ago

Investor Confidence in Ozak AI Continues To Rise Despite Broader Uncertainty Across Crypto Markets

TheNewsCrypto12m ago

Unicoin Foundation Debuts, Aligning Social Impact with the Future of Responsible Crypto

Unicoin Inc. has launched the Unicoin Foundation, a mission-driven organization aimed at leveraging blockchain for social impact and expanding digital economy access. The Foundation’s with evolving regulatory clarity under SEC Chair Paul Atkins, emphasizing transparency and responsible innovation. Its flagship initiative, “Crypto for Good,” focuses on financial literacy, entrepreneurship support, and ecosystem development to enable broader participation in crypto, particularly for underrepresented communities. The Foundation will operate under independent governance chaired by Robert Newman, with a board of 27 directors elected by shareholders. This follows a shareholder vote where nearly 99% approved the transition to an independent structure, aligning with proposed regulatory frameworks for digital assets.

TheNewsCrypto53m ago

Unicoin Foundation Debuts, Aligning Social Impact with the Future of Responsible Crypto

TheNewsCrypto53m ago

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist2h ago

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist2h ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit2h ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit2h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow