BTC Market Pulse: Week 24

insights.glassnodePublished on 2026-06-08Last updated on 2026-06-08

Abstract

Bitcoin market sentiment remains cautious as sellers dominate activity across spot and derivatives markets. Increased spot volume reflects defensive selling rather than new demand, while futures open interest contracts and options skew indicates heightened demand for downside protection. U.S. spot ETF data shows surging volumes but persistently negative net flows, suggesting institutions are re-evaluating exposure. Despite this pressure, fundamental network metrics like active addresses show broadening engagement, and long-term holders continue to dominate supply, maintaining a resilient underlying structure. The market appears to be navigating a phase of capitulation, balancing short-term liquidation pressure against a stable long-term holder base.

Bitcoin remains under pressure as sellers continue to dominate
market activity. Spot markets have seen momentum deteriorate
sharply, with aggressive taker selling driving a notable increase in
spot volume. Rather than signaling renewed demand, the rise in
activity suggests market participants are using liquidity to reduce
exposure, reflecting a more defensive market tone.

Derivatives markets tell a similar story. Futures open interest has
contracted as leverage is unwound, while perpetual positioning
reflects persistent sell-side aggression. In options markets,
demand for downside protection has risen materially, with both
25-delta skew and the volatility spread moving higher. Together,
these signals point to growing caution among investors as the
market navigates a period of heightened uncertainty.

Institutional behavior, observed through U.S. spot ETFs,
underscores this cautious sentiment. While trading volumes have
surged in response to recent volatility, net capital flows remain
persistently negative, and aggregate investor profitability has
compressed toward cost-basis levels. This suggests that
institutional participants are currently re-evaluating their exposure,
contributing to the broader atmosphere of uncertainty.

Despite these headwinds, fundamental network metrics show a
broadening base of engagement, with active addresses and
transfer volumes expanding. While total fee volume has cooled,
long-term holders continue to dominate supply distribution,
maintaining a resilient market structure. Ultimately, the transition
toward realized losses and the contraction in unrealized
profitability signal a phase of capitulation, as the market balances
short-term liquidation pressure against a stable, long-term holder
base.

Off-Chain Indicators

On-Chain Indicators

🔗 Access the full report in PDF

Don't miss it!

Smart market intelligence, straight to your inbox.

Subscribe now
  • Follow us and reach out on X
  • Join our Telegram channel
  • For on-chain metrics, dashboards, and alerts, visit Glassnode Studio

Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for information and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies.

Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the main driver behind the notable increase in Bitcoin spot market volume during Week 24?

AThe rise in spot volume is not driven by renewed demand. Instead, it is driven by aggressive taker selling, suggesting market participants are using available liquidity to reduce their exposure, which reflects a more defensive market tone.

QWhat signals from the derivatives and options markets indicate growing investor caution?

AIn derivatives, futures open interest has contracted as leverage is unwound, and perpetual positioning shows persistent sell-side aggression. In options, demand for downside protection has risen, evidenced by increases in both the 25-delta skew and the volatility spread.

QWhat does the behavior of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, as mentioned in the report, suggest about institutional sentiment?

ADespite surging trading volumes due to recent volatility, net capital flows for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs remain persistently negative, and aggregate investor profitability has compressed toward cost-basis levels. This suggests institutional participants are re-evaluating their exposure, contributing to the overall uncertainty.

QDespite the selling pressure, what positive fundamental network metrics are highlighted in the article?

AFundamental network metrics show a broadening base of engagement, with active addresses and transfer volumes expanding. Furthermore, long-term holders continue to dominate supply distribution, which helps maintain a resilient market structure.

QWhat does the report conclude is the current phase of the Bitcoin market, based on profitability and holder behavior?

AThe report concludes that the transition toward realized losses and the contraction in unrealized profitability signal a phase of capitulation. The market is balancing short-term liquidation pressure against a stable, long-term holder base.

Related Reads

Kevin Warsch's Fed Decision Nears: Here's Why TD Securities Thinks the Dollar Could Still Fall

The upcoming Federal Reserve decision under Chair Kevin Warsh is widely expected to result in no change to interest rates for the fifth consecutive meeting, with market-implied probability at 95-98%. Bitcoin has already reacted to this uncertainty, briefly dropping before stabilizing near $63,660, extending its July losses. TD Securities argues that despite this consensus, markets are still mispricing the risk of a rate hike. The bank contends that the dollar is poised to fall once the Fed confirms a hold, as current pricing reflects an exaggerated probability of tightening driven by geopolitical risk premiums, not likely Fed action. This potential mispricing represents one of the largest gaps between market expectations and actual Fed policy in a decade. Post-decision, TD forecasts further dollar weakening, expecting a roughly 2% decline by late 2026, as the Fed is seen maintaining rates absent clear evidence of sustained inflation and labor market strength. For Bitcoin, the Fed's tone is critical. A hold accompanied by dovish signals, strong AI investment forecasts, and positive upcoming PCE inflation data could support a move toward $68,000-$70,000. Conversely, unexpectedly hawkish communication risks pushing prices back toward the $58,000-$60,000 range. A weaker dollar, as predicted by TD, could also provide a supportive backdrop for Bitcoin and other risk assets.

cryptonews.ru2m ago

Kevin Warsch's Fed Decision Nears: Here's Why TD Securities Thinks the Dollar Could Still Fall

cryptonews.ru2m ago

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

Bitcoin mining is a race without a real-time referee. A newly mined block must physically propagate across the global peer-to-peer network before consensus is reached on the chain's tip. This takes seconds, sometimes longer on congested connections. If a second miner finds a valid block before learning of a competing one, they build on their last-known version and broadcast their own block. For a short time, two equally valid blocks exist at the same height, creating a temporary chain split. The network resolves this not by voting or timestamps, but by Proof-of-Work: the chain that accumulates the most work becomes canonical. Blocks on the losing side are "orphaned" or "stale." Their miners lose the block reward and fees, though unconfirmed transactions return to the mempool. Usually, a single subsequent block resolves the tie. A notable two-block reorganization occurred on March 24, 2026. Antpool and Foundry USA mined competing versions of block 941,881 seconds apart. ViaBTC extended Antpool's chain, while Foundry extended its own, creating a one-block split. Foundry then pulled ahead by mining six consecutive blocks, making its chain the heaviest. All nodes switched to Foundry's chain, orphaning blocks from Antpool and ViaBTC. While such multi-block reorganizations are rare, the underlying race condition is common. Analysis shows about 9.2% of block intervals in a sample period were under 60 seconds, each representing a potential short-lived race. Fast relay networks have reduced propagation delays, making prolonged splits rarer. However, the event highlighted a trend of hash rate concentration, where well-resourced pools have a higher chance of winning any specific race and mining consecutive blocks, marginalizing smaller miners.

cryptonews.ru12m ago

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

cryptonews.ru12m ago

AmericanFortress proposed a scheme to protect crypto wallets from quantum threats

AmericanFortress has published a preprint detailing ZKPoSP, a cryptographic scheme designed to protect hierarchically deterministic (HD) cryptocurrency wallets from potential quantum attacks without requiring users to change their addresses. The proposed scheme replaces classical digital signatures with non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs, aiming to maintain compatibility with existing address formats. The company also introduced the QBIP32 scheme, intended to generate a signing scalar, a separate quantum-resistant proof, and a chain code in a single function call. According to the authors, QBIP32 can be applied to various elliptic curves of prime order, including secp256k1 and Ed25519. The post-quantum security of the scheme is described as "conjectured," relying on the quantum resistance of the underlying hash functions and NIZK proofs. However, for the scheme to function in a given blockchain network (like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana), nodes would need to support verification of these new proofs instead of standard signatures—a capability currently not implemented. An implementation in Rust using RISC Zero reportedly takes 12–13 seconds to generate a proof and 9–10 milliseconds to verify it. The publication follows other industry efforts to address quantum threats, including reports from Galaxy on vulnerable assets, new hardware wallets like the PQ1, and consortiums like the Bitcoin Security Consortium pledging funding for post-quantum cryptography research. This new work specifically focuses on HD wallets and positions ZKPoSP/QBIP32 as a general mechanism for multiple curves and networks.

cryptonews.ru22m ago

AmericanFortress proposed a scheme to protect crypto wallets from quantum threats

cryptonews.ru22m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片