Broke the Cycle. How Bitcoin's Price Changed Over 10 Years on Christmas

RBK-cryptoPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

The article "Прервал цикличность. Как менялась цена биткоина за 10 лет в Рождество" (Breaking the Cycle: How Bitcoin's Price Changed Over 10 Christmases) analyzes the price of Bitcoin on December 25th for each year from 2015 to 2025. The key finding is that 2025 broke a recent pattern. After nine years where a price drop only occurred the year after three consecutive years of growth, Bitcoin's price in 2025 fell by 11% to $87,600 from the previous Christmas ($98,700 in 2024). This decline is attributed to macroeconomic shocks and large-scale liquidation events in October, making it only the third year in the dataset with a year-over-year Christmas decline. The summary of each year's price and key drivers is as follows: * **2015:** $456 - Consolidation phase. * **2016:** $894 (+96%) - Growth ahead of the halving. * **2017:** $14,300 (+1500%) - Peak of retail frenzy. * **2018:** $4,000 (-72%) - Deep correction after the bubble. * **2019:** $7,300 (+81%) - Initial recovery. * **2020:** $23,800 (+227%) - New institutional cycle begins. * **2021:** $50,900 (+114%) - New all-time high. * **2022:** $16,800 (-67%) - "Crypto winter" with major collapses. * **2023:** $43,000 (+155%) - Recovery on ETF approval hopes. * **2024:** $98,700 (+130%) - Bull run continues post-ETF launch. * **2025:** $87,600 (-11%) - Correction due to macroeconomics. The article concludes that while Bitcoin's growth cycles reach new levels with greater institutional adoption, the 2025 ...

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

Almost every Bitcoin growth cycle occurs at a qualitatively new level, where not only capitalization grows but also institutional and regulatory recognition worldwide. And the sharp drop in the price of the main cryptocurrency in 2025 is another reminder that the crypto market, while maturing, does not cease to be volatile and sensitive to global risks.

On Catholic Christmas Day, December 25th, many members of the crypto community recall what the market was like for the main cryptocurrency in previous years. The service Coingecko published Bitcoin prices for the past ten years based on data for each December 25th.

The year 2025 was notable for breaking the pattern of the last nine years, where a decline occurred in the year following three consecutive years of price growth.

2015: $456

A period of consolidation and accumulation after the completion of the previous market cycle.

2016: $894

A 96% increase amid expectations of the upcoming halving (a reduction in Bitcoin's emission rate approximately every four years) and the formation of an upward trend.

2017: $14.3K

The peak of retail frenzy with a 1500% increase. Bitcoin becomes a phenomenon in financial markets.

2018: $4.0K

A phase of deep correction with a 72% drop after the speculative bubble of the previous year. The height of the bear market.

2019: $7.3K

A stage of Bitcoin price recovery with positive dynamics of 81%, the initial phase of exiting the bear market.

2020: $23.8K

The beginning of a new institutional cycle against the backdrop of unprecedented money printing by world central banks during the COVID pandemic. The annual increase was 227%.

2021: $50.9K

Reaching a new all-time high with a 114% increase, fueled by the activity of institutional investors.

2022: $16.8K

A period of crypto winter: a series of crises with the collapse of the Terra (LUNA) crypto project and the bankruptcy of the FTX crypto exchange, as well as the tightening of the US Federal Reserve's monetary policy, led to a 67% decline.

2023: $43.0K

A powerful recovery of 155%, driven by expectations of approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the US.

2024: $98.7K

Continuation of the bull trend with a 130% increase after the successful launch of ETFs and significant inflow of institutional capital.

2025: $87.6K

An 11% correction as a result of macroeconomic shocks and large-scale liquidation events in October. 2025 became the third year in history when the Bitcoin price on December 25th decreased compared to the previous Christmas.

How the Base blockchain ecosystem works. Top 5 applications

AI outperformed humans in a crypto trading tournament. What were the results

"Capitulation" of miners called a bullish factor for Bitcoin. Why

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason Bitcoin broke its cyclical pattern in 2025 according to the article?

AThe article states that 2025 broke the pattern of the previous nine years due to macroeconomic shocks and large-scale liquidation events in October, which led to an 11% price correction.

QWhich year saw the highest percentage increase in Bitcoin's price on Christmas Day, and what was the driver?

A2017 saw the highest percentage increase of 1500%, driven by a peak in retail frenzy, making Bitcoin a phenomenon in financial markets.

QWhat were the two major events cited as causes for the 'crypto winter' and price drop in 2022?

AThe two major events were the collapse of the Terra (LUNA) crypto project and the bankruptcy of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange, combined with the tightening of the US Federal Reserve's monetary policy.

QWhat was the primary driver for Bitcoin's powerful 155% recovery in 2023?

AThe primary driver was the expectation of approval for spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) in the United States.

QHow many times in history has the Bitcoin price decreased on December 25th compared to the previous Christmas, with 2025 being one of them?

A2025 was the third year in history where the Bitcoin price on December 25th was lower than the previous Christmas.

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit1h ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit1h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit3h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片