Bitcoin’s quantum future – Saylor plays down risks as experts raise red flags

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

The urgency to upgrade Bitcoin's network to be quantum-resistant is intensifying, as projects like Solana and Ethereum are already advancing their quantum security roadmaps. While the Bitcoin community is discussing similar proposals, experts express concern that implementation may be too slow due to the difficulty of achieving consensus. Michael Saylor, however, downplays the risk, asserting that quantum computing will "harden BTC" and that major tech firms and governments will prevent the technology from becoming a threat prematurely. Experts like Eli Ben-Sasson and Mihailo Bjelic disagree, citing practical challenges in upgrading Bitcoin’s codebase and the unrealistic timeline required for a smooth transition. Estimates suggest quantum computers could crack Bitcoin’s ECDSA-based security within 5-15 years, with one analysis indicating a 34%-55% probability by 2028-2030. Older Bitcoin addresses, particularly from the Satoshi era, are most vulnerable, while newer SegWit addresses offer partial protection. The consensus is that without a timely upgrade, Bitcoin faces significant devaluation and security risks.

The urgency to upgrade Bitcoin to a more quantum-proof network has intensified.

Consider this – Solana announced that it has deployed post-quantum signatures on the testnet, indicating its readiness to be more secure. Even Ethereum has a roadmap for achieving quantum security.

Although the Bitcoin community is also actively discussing similar proposals, there is some doubt whether they can be implemented quickly enough before the quantum threat becomes a reality.

However, Michael Saylor, the pioneer of BTC corporate treasury, doesn’t share a similar urgency. In fact, he recently noted that quantum computing will “harden BTC,” not break it.

Saylor elicits mixed reactions

For Saylor, the big tech firms will figure it out and can’t let the quantum tech go mainstream before governments update their systems. However, most experts disagree with his “simplistic” view and nonchalance.

Eli Ben-Sasson, founder of Starknet and Zcash, said that Saylor’s plans may be workable in theory, but impractical in real life due to the difficulty of reaching consensus.

“Agree, in theory. Aren’t you worried code is by now so ossified, and simple fixes (like op_cat) so hard to push that in practice it just won’t happen?”

Mihailo Bjelic, a former co-founder of Polygon, also shared similar reservations and noted,

“The upgrade takes ~2 years (~6 months if all regular txs stop, which is unrealistic). And this is assuming this major upgrade goes through smoothly, without contention (which is hard to imagine).”

Assessing the odds of quantum risk

Despite Google’s breakthrough in quantum computing, the tech is about 5-15 years or more away from becoming a real threat capable of cracking the Bitcoin network and wallets.

For his part, Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, stated that there was a 34%-55% chance that BTC could be cracked by quantum computers by 2028-2030.

He added that Bitcoin will be devalued by similar odds if the upgrade doesn’t happen.

“Given a 2-3 yr timeline to deploy fix, this is the current discount rate. And it is growing. Every. Single. Day.”

Bitcoin’s security relies on ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) and SHA-256 (hashing mechanism). The former can easily be cracked, and both public and private keys can be retrieved with a powerful quantum computer.

However, most old-format addresses (primarily from the Satoshi era) are now at risk, while new Segwit addresses are partially secure from long-range quantum attacks, according to experts.


Final Thoughts

  • Some experts are worried that Bitcoin may miss the window to upgrade to a quantum-secure network.
  • The Satoshi era and a few other address formats are currently vulnerable to long-range quantum attacks.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Major Altcoin Market Players Did This During the Massive Rally!

As the cryptocurrency bull market intensifies, large-scale transactions by crypto 'whales' are drawing significant attention. Blockchain data reveals multi-million dollar positions opened and closed in Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), and Hyperliquid ($HYPE). A major investor, likely tied to Matrixport, closed a 40,000 $ETH long position worth ~$100.5M for a $9.9M profit. The investor still holds 80,000 $ETH (~$201M) and 500 $BTC (~$39M), with an unrealized profit of ~$22.9M. This turned their previous $92.5M total loss into an approximate $32.8M overall profit. On Hyperliquid, a trader known as loracle.hl reportedly lost over $70M trading $HYPE in the past three months. The investor currently holds ~$54.88M in $HYPE short positions, at risk of liquidation if $HYPE's price reaches $101.15. Notorious trader Machi Big Brother, who reportedly survived 500 liquidations, capitalized on the recent rally. He grew his portfolio from $152K to $12.72M in just three days, yielding over $12.5M in profit. While $HYPE hits a new all-time high, Multicoin Capital has deposited 427,422 $HYPE (~$31.74M) to Coinbase Prime over three days, raising speculation about a potential sale or portfolio rebalance. In Bitcoin markets, an anonymous whale stands out, selling ~2,700 $BTC (~$211.8M) in a recent transaction. Over three days, this whale sold a total of 7,700 $BTC, valued at approximately $576.6M.

cryptonews.ru39m ago

Major Altcoin Market Players Did This During the Massive Rally!

cryptonews.ru39m ago

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

Based on a recent field research in Silicon Valley, Goldman Sachs highlights a key shift in the AI industry: moving from systems that "answer questions" to autonomous AI agents that "execute tasks." Commercial models are transitioning from per-seat subscriptions to usage- and outcome-based pricing. The competition is shifting from raw model capability to mastery over specific business workflows, with value accruing to proprietary data, domain context, and operational expertise. A major hurdle for enterprise Agent deployment is not technical ability but "controllability"—issues of accountability, auditability, and error correction, especially in regulated fields. Workflows with clear rules, verifiable outcomes, and reversible actions (e.g., invoice processing) are being automated first. The model landscape is evolving toward a division of labor. Frontier models (like GPT-4) are expected to handle high-value, high-reliability core tasks, while improving open-source models will likely capture the majority (~90%) of inference tokens for standardized, high-volume tasks due to cost advantages. Finally, attention is moving from Large Language Models (LLMs) to "World Models," which understand physical environments, causality, and dynamic interactions. This shift elevates the importance of proprietary, real-world data (from industrial, scientific, and robotic systems) and could drive a second wave of compute demand. Goldman Sachs projects compute needs could grow ~24x over five years, benefiting cloud and infrastructure providers.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

marsbit1h ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

Fidelity Digital Assets cautions that the anticipated boom in AI agents does not automatically guarantee a corresponding surge in public blockchain adoption or token value. While AI agents that can autonomously perform tasks like payments and data calls could theoretically utilize blockchain for settlement, a significant gap exists between "can use" and "must use." The analysis highlights six key risks. First, many AI agents, especially in corporate settings, may prefer closed, permissioned systems over public blockchains due to needs for speed, cost, compliance, and control. Second, increased on-chain transactions from AI-driven micropayments may not benefit native tokens if fees remain low or if value is captured by stablecoins and payment service providers instead. Third, while AI lowers development costs and increases the number of projects, more code does not equal more economic value and can lead to market oversaturation. Fourth, AI commoditizes coding, making pure technological advantage less of a sustainable moat; competition may shift to brand, liquidity, and user networks. Fifth, AI can also lower the cost of attacks by making vulnerability discovery easier, potentially outpacing security auditing and increasing ecosystem risk. Sixth, institutions may require "controlled blockchain" systems with robust identity, permissioning, and audit trails, conflicting with the permissionless nature of public chains. Ultimately, Fidelity argues against simply equating AI growth with blockchain prosperity. The narrative requires moving from speculation to a concrete analysis of which infrastructures can convert real AI agent needs into sustainable economic value, critically examining each step of the assumed value chain.

marsbit1h ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

marsbit1h ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

Telegram has introduced a new experimental WEB-Proxy technology designed to circumvent blocking by disguising messenger traffic as regular, secure website visits. Announced on August 21, 2026, the technology routes MTProxy data through an in-app WebView using HTTPS or WebSocket transport, making the data stream indistinguishable from legitimate web surfing. The core innovation is a multiplexed stream sent through a single WebView session. It uses special frame formats to pack multiple logical Telegram connections into one encrypted channel that externally resembles loading a web page. A server-side relay receives this stream, separates it into individual connections for the standard MTProxy, without decrypting content or knowing final destinations, thus preserving privacy. The WEB-Proxy operates on a standard HTTPS domain that also hosts a public website. The proxy bridge page is only activated by a specific URL parameter derived via HMAC-SHA256 from the proxy configuration; all other requests receive the normal site homepage. This provides reliable cover against automated detection systems. Currently a proof-of-concept, the system includes a desktop implementation, an experimental Android client, and plans for iOS support. The technology represents a shift towards more sophisticated integration with legitimate web infrastructure, complicating filtering systems that must choose between blocking HTTPS traffic entirely or allowing service access. Its long-term value will depend on resilience to adaptive traffic analysis and scalability without performance loss.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片