Bitcoin's 'No One to Take Over' Plunge: Where Is the Bottom?

比推Published on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

Bitcoin's price continues to decline, briefly falling below $64,000 over the weekend and hitting its lowest level since early February, with a nearly 4% drop in 24 hours. The market has turned extremely fearful, as shown by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropping to a low of 5. Macro factors are contributing to the downturn, including potential global tariff increases and heightened geopolitical risks. Bitcoin's correlation with tech stocks has strengthened, and the decline in AI-related stocks like IBM has added pressure. Institutional outflows are another concern. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for multiple consecutive weeks, reducing support from passive long-term capital. Basis trades have become less profitable, and leveraged positions are vulnerable in a weakening macro environment. On-chain data indicates that selling pressure from short-term holders, while still present, has slowed. Long-term holders remain relatively calm, but miner selling—such as Bitdeer liquidating its entire Bitcoin holdings—adds to the negative sentiment. Technically, Bitcoin has broken below key support levels, and some analysts warn of a potential further drop to the $40,000–$50,000 range, or even lower in a severe bear scenario. However, prominent bulls remain optimistic about a long-term recovery. The upcoming NVIDIA earnings report is seen as a near-term catalyst that could influence market sentiment, given Bitcoin’s heightened sensitivity to tech stock performance. Overa...

This past weekend, the crypto market found no respite. After a narrow-range consolidation on Saturday and Sunday, Bitcoin came under renewed pressure during today's European and American trading hours, briefly falling below the $64,000 mark to hit $63,924.44, setting a new low since February 6th. At the time of writing, the price has rebounded slightly to around $64,800, with a nearly 4% drop over 24 hours.

This is a liquidity drought that has lasted for days. Since February 20th, Bitcoin has been in a downward trend for four consecutive trading days, with a cumulative drop of over 7%. Compared to the all-time high of nearly $127,000 in October last year, the current price has almost halved.

Market sentiment has frozen over amidst the persistent volatility. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index slipped to a single-digit 5 yesterday, remaining in the extreme "Fear" zone for three consecutive days: this is the lowest reading since the market panic in January this year.

Macro: Tariff Turmoil and Shaken AI Narrative

Although last week's US CPI data showed easing inflationary pressures, the market's focus has quickly shifted to new variables in the global trade situation.

Last Friday, the US Supreme Court rejected former President Trump's previous use of "emergency powers" to impose tariffs. Subsequently, Trump's camp indicated it would pursue a new legal path to advance temporary global tariffs, potentially raising the rate from 10% to 15%. The EU immediately responded, demanding the US comply with existing trade agreements. This back-and-forth has forced the market to reassess the possibility of escalating global trade friction. Additionally, heightened geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East, with a new round of US-Iran negotiations scheduled for the 26th in Geneva, Switzerland, adds to the mix.

Risk assets are extremely sensitive to this. US tech stocks fell in tandem, with software and AI-related companies under pressure.

Adding to the woes, during Monday's US trading session, AI bellwether IBM plunged over 11% due to Anthropic's release of an AI tool that automates COBOL language, dragging down the broader tech sector. Market analysis firm Ecoinometrics pointed out that Bitcoin is currently extremely sensitive to downside risks in the US stock market. When US tech stocks confirm a structural downtrend, Bitcoin often follows closely behind and amplifies the decline. The low-volatility structure that previously supported Bitcoin's independent rally has been broken due to deep institutional involvement, shifting to a higher correlation with tech stocks.

Institutions: From "Basis Trade" to Full Risk-Off

A more critical variable lies with institutional capital.

According to SoSoValue data, for the week ending February 20th, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $316 million in net outflows; Ethereum ETFs saw about $123 million in net outflows. This marks multiple consecutive weeks of net capital withdrawal.

ETF flows were the core marginal driver of the previous bull run. Net outflows imply two things:

First, institutions do not see the current price as "significantly undervalued" in the short term;
Second, the price lacks the support of passive, long-term capital.

The "basis trade" (buying spot or ETFs while shorting futures to lock in the price difference), previously popular among institutions, has become unprofitable as prices have fallen. In the absence of sustained ETF inflows, the price action relies more on derivative-driven capital. Once macro conditions weaken, leveraged positions are prone to stampedes.

On-Chain: Long-Term Holder Selling Slows, Miner Selling

Amid the gloom of continued price declines, on-chain data also reveals some subtle signals.

Glassnode notes that the 7-day average net realized profit/loss for investors (short-term holders) has narrowed from -$1.24 billion/day on February 6th to -$480 million/day, indicating that loss-selling is weakening but has not yet ended.

This suggests a typical "bottom handover period": selling pressure still exists, but the intensity of panic has subsided.

Stratifying the market:

  • Long-term holders show no significant panic;

  • Short-term capital is still exiting at a loss;

  • In terms of sentiment indicators, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index has slipped into the "Extreme Fear" zone.

This combination usually corresponds to a consolidation and bottoming process, rather than a trend reversal.

Meanwhile, subtle changes are also occurring on the supply side.

Bitdeer disclosed that as of February 20th, it had sold all 943 of its self-held Bitcoins, reducing its book BTC to zero, stating this move was to储备 liquidity for land and data center expansion. Against the backdrop of falling prices and compressed mining profits, miners selling their reserve coins can exacerbate阶段性 selling pressure. While this is not industry-wide behavior, it can be magnified and overinterpreted by the market during fragile sentiment phases.

Outlook: NVIDIA Earnings Could Be Short-Term Inflection Point

The market is searching for the next directional cue amidst the panic. Currently, Bitcoin is struggling at a key technical support level—the 200-week Exponential Moving Average (EMA) around $68,350 has been breached.

Analyst Tom McClellan warned that although the "smart money" in CME futures is rapidly reducing short positions, this merely reflects market conditions rather than a clear rebound signal. If key support is lost, Bitcoin still risks a further decline into the $40,000 to $50,000 range. Ned Davis Research strategists offered an even more pessimistic hypothesis, suggesting that if this bear market turns into a "crypto winter," Bitcoin could fall to $31,000.

Against this backdrop, Google searches for "Bitcoin is dead" have quietly climbed in recent months.

But bulls like Arthur Hayes, Tom Lee, and Michael Saylor are still vocal through various channels: it's only a matter of time before Bitcoin returns to and even surpasses its historical highs.

In the short term, a potential variable lies in this week's macro events. Digital asset company Keyrock pointed out that NVIDIA's earnings report, scheduled for February 25th, could be the next major catalyst for the market. Given the current market's extreme sensitivity to the AI narrative and Bitcoin's high correlation with tech stocks, NVIDIA's earnings guidance will directly impact the risk appetite of the tech sector and the overall market, subsequently transmitting to the crypto market.

In summary, amidst heightened macro uncertainty and liquidity drought, Bitcoin is in a phase of lacking liquidity and fragile confidence. The market's self-repair might require waiting for the complete cessation of selling by long-term holders or the emergence of new macro policy signals (such as a clear dovish tilt from the Fed). Until then, any rebound is likely to face heavy selling pressure.

Author: Bootly


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613885

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Bitcoin and how much has it fallen from its all-time high?

AAs of the time of writing, Bitcoin's price has rebounded slightly to around $64,800, with a 24-hour drop of nearly 4%. It has fallen nearly 50% from its all-time high of nearly $127,000 in October of last year.

QWhat major macroeconomic events are contributing to the pressure on Bitcoin and risk assets?

AKey macroeconomic factors include renewed global trade tensions, with the possibility of new U.S. tariffs being raised from 10% to 15%, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East. Additionally, a sell-off in AI and tech stocks, triggered by news about IBM and Anthropic, is negatively impacting risk sentiment.

QWhat does the data show about institutional investment in Bitcoin ETFs recently?

AAccording to SoSoValue data, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $316 million for the week ending February 20th, and Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of about $123 million. This represents multiple consecutive weeks of net capital outflows.

QAccording to on-chain data, what is the current state of selling pressure from different investor groups?

AGlassnode data indicates that selling from short-term holders is slowing, with the 7-day average net realized profit/loss narrowing. Long-term holders are not shown to be in a state of panic, while short-term capital is still exiting at a loss. This is typical of a bottoming phase, not a trend reversal.

QWhat potential short-term catalyst for the market is highlighted in the article, and why is it significant?

ANVIDIA's earnings report, scheduled for February 25th, is highlighted as a potential short-term catalyst. Given the market's current high sensitivity to the AI narrative and Bitcoin's high correlation with tech stocks, NVIDIA's performance and guidance could significantly impact overall market risk appetite and, by extension, the crypto market.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit1h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit1h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit2h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片