Bitcoin Price Weakens as Correlation With Stocks Hits Lowest Since FTX Collapse

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

According to Santiment data, Bitcoin's correlation with major U.S. stock indexes has dropped to its lowest level since the FTX collapse in late 2022, declining approximately 43% over the past six months. During this period, Bitcoin fell about 43%, while the S&P 500 rose 7% and gold climbed 51%, highlighting a significant divergence in performance. Bitcoin is currently trading around $65,420, showing minor recovery but remaining technically weak. Key indicators such as the death cross formation (50-day MA below 200-day MA) and an RSI of 35.26 suggest continued bearish momentum. The price is consolidating within a $60,000–$70,000 range with lower highs, indicating seller dominance. Near-term support lies at $63,900–$64,000, with critical psychological support at $60,000. Resistance levels are near $70,000 and the 50-day MA around $79,672. The analysis concludes that Bitcoin shows no clear signs of its downward trend reversal.

Bitcoin’s price relationship with major equity indexes has weakened sharply, falling to its lowest level since the collapse of FTX in late 2022, according to on-chain data from analytics firm Santiment. Over the past six months, the statistical correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks has declined by approximately 43%, a level not seen since the period following the FTX failure.

During this same period, traditional risk assets have performed differently. The S&P 500 index rose about 7%, while the price of gold climbed roughly 51%. By contrast, Bitcoin recorded a roughly 43% decline over the past six months, highlighting a notable divergence in returns across leading asset classes.

Santiment said the current dislocation represents the weakest observed correlation between Bitcoin and stocks since late August, indicating that Bitcoin is currently moving largely independently of traditional equity trends. The firm’s analysis noted that such pronounced breaks in historical correlation “have typically been followed by a reversion” in past cycles.

Bitcoin Price Shows Weakness

This pronounced breakdown in correlation coincides with clear signs of technical weakness in Bitcoin’s price structure. Bitcoin’s price is showing a small recovery but remains weak overall. On the daily chart, BTC is trading around $65,420, after reaching an intraday high of about $66,284.59 and a low near $62,553.19 during the day, gaining about 5%.

But the technical picture is still bearish. The 50-day moving average, currently near 79,672 USDT, is below the 200-day moving average, which is around 98,159 USDT. This “death cross” indicates that the medium-term trend is downward. Bitcoin’s price is also well below both these averages, suggesting that the current rise is not a strong recovery.

The BTC price has been moving within a range between roughly $60,000 and $70,000 in recent weeks. This pattern shows the price is consolidating but still making lower highs, which means sellers are still in control.

Zooming in, the Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum indicator, is at 35.26. It has bounced back from oversold levels but remains below the neutral 50 mark, signaling that downward momentum continues.

If BTC maintains the pressure key, near-term support is visible around $63,900–$64,000, followed by the important psychological level of $60,000. A drop below 60,000 could lead to further declines toward 55,000 USDT. On the upside, resistance is expected near 70,000 USDT and then at the 50-day moving average around 79,672 USDT. The 200-day moving average near 98,159 USDT also acts as a major resistance level.

Overall, Bitcoin’s price is in a weak position and shows no clear sign of reversing the recent downward trend.

TagsBitcoinBTCCrypto MarketFTXstocks

Related Questions

QWhat is the current correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stock indexes according to Santiment's data?

AThe correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. stocks has declined by approximately 43% over the past six months, reaching its lowest level since the collapse of FTX in late 2022.

QHow did Bitcoin's price performance compare to traditional risk assets like the S&P 500 and gold over the past six months?

ABitcoin recorded a roughly 43% decline over the past six months, while the S&P 500 rose about 7% and gold climbed roughly 51%, showing a notable divergence in returns.

QWhat technical pattern indicates Bitcoin's medium-term downward trend according to the article?

AThe 'death cross' pattern, where the 50-day moving average (near $79,672) is below the 200-day moving average (near $98,159), indicates the medium-term trend is downward.

QWhat are the key support and resistance levels for Bitcoin's price mentioned in the analysis?

ANear-term support is around $63,900-$64,000, followed by the psychological level of $60,000. Resistance is expected near $70,000, then at the 50-day moving average around $79,672, and the 200-day moving average near $98,159.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 35.26 indicate about Bitcoin's momentum?

AThe RSI of 35.26, while having bounced back from oversold levels, remains below the neutral 50 mark, signaling that downward momentum continues.

Related Reads

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit43m ago

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit43m ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手43m ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手43m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片