Behind USDH's Acquisition by Coinbase: Hyperliquid's Interest-Driven Choice

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-15Last updated on 2026-05-15

Abstract

Coinbase announces its integration with Hyperliquid, becoming the official USDC treasury deployer on the platform. The native stablecoin USDH, issued by Native Markets, will be gradually phased out as Coinbase acquires its brand assets. Users can convert USDH to USDC or fiat without fees during the transition. The move solidifies USDC as Hyperliquid's official stablecoin and pricing asset. The arrangement is framed as a three-way win: Coinbase deepens its ties to the Hyperliquid ecosystem; Hyperliquid gains the vast majority of future USDC reserve yield revenue (estimated at up to 90%); and Native Markets exits with compensation from the asset sale. However, some community members criticize the outcome, viewing USDH's shutdown as a retreat from decentralization and arguing that the original governance vote favored internal interests over users. The partnership also sees Circle and Coinbase staking HYPE tokens to support the network's AQAv2 upgrade. Ultimately, the article suggests the resolution underscores pragmatic economic interests over earlier community-centric rhetoric.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

Last September, the battle over Hyperliquid's native stablecoin USDH once became an industry focus; now, this once highly anticipated stablecoin has suddenly reached its "exit moment."

Last night, Coinbase announced it will become the official treasury deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid, while USDH issuer Native Markets granted Coinbase the rights to purchase USDH brand assets. Subsequently, the USDH market will be gradually phased out, during which users can still convert USDH to USDC or fiat currency without fees.

Thus, the once famous USDH has become an asset acquired by Coinbase, while USDC has been officially established as Hyperliquid's official stablecoin and pricing asset. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly analyze the details and subsequent impacts in this article.

USDH Exits, USDC Rises: The Economic Calculations Behind $5 Billion

The grand drama of the "Hyperliquid Ecosystem Stablecoin Battle" has concluded with a win-win-win outcome for Coinbase & Circle, Hyperliquid, and USDH issuer Native Markets.

Coinbase further deepens its ties with the Hyperliquid ecosystem; Hyperliquid gains the majority of the stablecoin reserve income from USDC within its ecosystem; Native Markets, as the ultimate winner of the past USDH era, receives its reward by "selling the USDH brand assets."

Coinbase & Circle: Deepening Integration with Hyperliquid's On-Chain Economy, Continuously Increasing HYPE Investment

Currently, the scale of USDC on Hyperliquid is approximately $5.164 billion, a two-fold year-on-year increase.

As the official partner and revenue-sharing party for USDC, Coinbase's move undoubtedly aims to deeply integrate with the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Furthermore, according to Hyperliquid's official announcement, both Coinbase (capital deployer) and Circle (responsible for technical deployment of CCTP and native cross-chain infrastructure) have committed to staking HYPE to activate AQAv2 (Aligned Quote Asset v2).

It is worth mentioning that in September last year, Circle already purchased HYPE tokens, and its current HYPE token staking scale has increased to around 500,000 tokens.

Hyperliquid: Receiving the Lion's Share of USDC Reserve Income, Benefiting from Coinbase Alliance

As for the biggest winner of this collaboration, it is undoubtedly Hyperliquid as the ecosystem foundation.

According to the official announcement, Coinbase will subsequently share the vast majority of reserve income revenue with the Hyperliquid protocol. Although the specific sharing ratio has not been disclosed, if based on the previous USDH revenue-sharing mechanism, Hyperliquid will actually receive approximately 90% of the reserve income.

Based on calculations by Hyperliquid community members, with a scale of $4.7 billion and an interest rate return of 3.8%, this corresponds to about $160 million in income; in other words, it equates to a daily $440,000 HYPE token buyback.

Moreover, with the CLARITY Act passing a vote in the US Senate Banking Committee, Hyperliquid's deep ties with Coinbase also imply that HYPE and Hyperliquid have gained a degree of support at the US regulatory level.

Native Markets: USDH's Historical Mission Accomplished

As the issuer of Hyperliquid's native stablecoin USDH, Native Markets appears to be the biggest loser in this "acquisition event," but judging from its official statement, its outcome can be considered a "successful retreat."

On one hand, USDH provided a model and template for the revenue-sharing agreement between Coinbase and the Hyperliquid protocol for USDC income; on the other hand, Coinbase likely directly acquired the USDH-related brand assets, meaning the USDH stablecoin issued by the Native Markets team was "acquired by Coinbase," thus providing the team with some economic return.

Subsequently, Native Markets also stated it would remain independent and seek development in other areas.

After USDH's Exit: In the Win-Win-Win Scenario, Only USDH Users Get Hurt

Of course, Native Markets' exit is not met with unanimous "praise." Hyperliquid community users also expressed criticism regarding its so-called "having a seat at the negotiation table" narrative.

Some believe that USDH's exit signifies a complete regression of the decentralization era;

Others pointed out that during the initial USDH stablecoin issuer vote, they should have chosen Paxos, as they at least considered users and stablecoin growth, while those who voted for Native Markets did so merely for alignment and internal interests. In the end, users gained nothing. These remarks also garnered considerable agreement and support.

Thus, the drama from a year ago, featuring "CEO romance" and "defying giants," has finally come to an end.

However, looking at the current scene of Hyperliquid "shaking hands and making peace" with Coinbase and Circle is somewhat sigh-inducing and even slightly ironic.

Everything, it turns out, was just about interest distribution, not the once-loudly chanted slogans of "for the community" or "for Hyperliquid."

Recommended Reading

Hyperliquid Stablecoin USDH Becomes "Industry Sweetheart," Giants Engage in Chaotic Distribution Rights Battle

USDH Vote in Progress: "Predetermined Script," "CEO Romance," "Retreating at the Height of Success" Take Turns on Stage

Related Questions

QWhat major change was announced regarding the native stablecoin USDH on Hyperliquid, and who was involved in the announcement?

ACoinbase announced it will become the official treasury deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid, and the USDH issuer Native Markets granted Coinbase the right to purchase the USDH brand assets. The USDH market will be gradually shut down.

QWhat is the primary reason for Coinbase's involvement in this deal according to the article, especially regarding its relationship with Hyperliquid and HYPE tokens?

ACoinbase aims to deepen its binding with the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Both Coinbase and Circle have committed to staking HYPE tokens to activate AQAv2. Circle has already purchased HYPE tokens, increasing its stake to around 500,000 HYPE.

QHow is the Hyperliquid protocol expected to benefit financially from this new arrangement with Coinbase and the shift to USDC?

AHyperliquid is set to receive the vast majority (estimated around 90%) of the reserve yield income from the USDC deposits on its platform. Based on community calculations using $47 billion in assets and a 3.8% yield, this could amount to approximately $44 million per year, used for daily HYPE buybacks.

QWhat was the outcome for Native Markets, the issuer of USDH, in this transition, and what are its future plans?

ANative Markets received economic compensation through the sale of the USDH brand assets to Coinbase. The company considers USDH's historical mission complete and stated it will remain independent and seek development in other areas.

QWhat criticism did some Hyperliquid community members express regarding the phasing out of USDH and the original vote for its issuer?

ASome community members criticized the move as a step back for decentralization. Others argued that voters should have chosen Paxos as the USDH issuer, as they were more focused on user and stablecoin growth, while those who voted for Native Markets were motivated by factionalism and internal interests, leaving end-users with nothing.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit48m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit48m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit58m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit58m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片