America’s CBDC Faces Ban Until 2031 Following Senate’s Latest Move

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-12Last updated on 2026-03-12

Abstract

The US Senate has passed a bipartisan housing bill, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which includes a provision to ban the Federal Reserve from issuing a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) or any similar public digital asset. This temporary prohibition, set to expire on December 31, 2030, aims to protect financial freedom and prevent competition with private financial systems. The measure faced some opposition from conservative Republicans seeking a permanent ban. The bill now moves to the House of Representatives, where some Republicans have already expressed opposition and may demand amendments, potentially delaying its final passage.

On Thursday, the US Senate voted decisively to ban the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), reflecting a growing bipartisan concern among lawmakers about protecting “financial freedom.”

CBDC Measure In Housing Bill

The Senate passed the bipartisan housing package known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. Within this bill, a specific provision prohibits the Federal Reserve (Fed) from issuing a retail CBDC, aiming to curb the rise of digital currencies that could compete with private financial systems.

Market expert MartyParty provided a breakdown of the key elements of the legislation on the social media platform X, explaining that the CBDC provision is included as a separate section within the housing bill, often referred to as a “sweetener” to gain wider legislative support.

It prohibits not only the creation and issuance of a retail CBDC but also the development of any similar digital asset intended for public use. Importantly, this restriction is set to expire on December 31, 2030, making it a temporary measure rather than a permanent ban.

The majority of dissenting votes reportedly came from a group of conservative Republicans—such as Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Rand Paul—who were advocating for a more permanent ban, along with one Democrat, Brian Schatz.

House Republicans Voice Concerns

The legislation emerged from a compromise led by Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren. After successfully navigating procedural hurdles, including a vote of 84-6 to proceed, the bill is now set to move to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

However, some House Republicans have already expressed their opposition, demanding that the CBDC ban be made permanent and voicing dissatisfaction over their limited role in the negotiation process.

MartyParty stated that if the House amends the bill, it could either return to the Senate or enter a conference committee for reconciliation, a process that could delay or jeopardize its passage.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.36 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main action taken by the US Senate regarding a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)?

AThe US Senate voted to ban the implementation of a retail CBDC until December 31, 2030.

QWhich legislative package contains the provision to ban a CBDC?

AThe provision is included in the bipartisan housing package known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.

QWhy did some conservative Republicans vote against the bill?

AThey advocated for a more permanent ban on a CBDC, rather than the temporary measure that expires in 2030.

QWhat is the next step for the bill after passing the Senate?

AThe bill will move to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

QWhat could happen if the House of Representatives amends the bill?

AIt could be sent back to the Senate or enter a conference committee for reconciliation, which might delay or jeopardize its passage.

Related Reads

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbit1h ago

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbit1h ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit2h ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片