Aevo Co-founder's Long Post Criticizes the Industry: I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-08Last updated on 2025-12-08

Abstract

In a widely circulated article, Aevo co-founder and CTO Ken Chan reflects on his eight years in the crypto industry with deep disillusionment, describing it as a "waste" of his life. Initially drawn by libertarian ideals and the vision of decentralized financial systems like Bitcoin enabling private, borderless wealth, Chan now believes the space has devolved into the "largest casino in human history"—a massive, speculative gambling arena masked as innovation. He argues that despite idealistic rhetoric, the industry's incentives have prioritized speculation over substantive progress. New Layer 1 chains, DEXs, and meme platforms often serve as zero-sum gambling mechanisms rather than tools for genuine financial improvement. Chan admits to profiting from the system but expresses disgust at his role in fostering an ecosystem where high-market-cap tokens with no real users thrive, contradicting sustainable economic principles. He warns that the normalization of financial nihilism and get-rich-quick mentalities poses long-term risks to social mobility and value creation. While he still believes in crypto’s original vision, Chan concludes that the industry has lost its way, and he now prioritizes being "right" over chasing profits.

Editor's Note: This weekend, an article by Ken Chan(@kenchangh), Co-founder and CTO of Aevo, went viral on the internet. The title of the article is "I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto".

Ken Chan's attitude in the article is extremely negative. He believes the industry has lost its idealism and turned into the largest super casino in human history with the most participants, and he feels disgusted for having contributed to this casino. Although we do not agree with Ken Chan's views, and many practitioners have refuted them after the article went viral, objectively speaking, his statements do reveal deep-seated issues in the current industry, such as loss of faith and collapse of values.

The following is the original content of Ken Chan's article, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

The Initial Motivation

When I was a teenager, I was already a very politically motivated person. Among all the books that made me more radical, the ones that influenced me the most were actually the works of Ayn Rand (such as "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged"). In 2016, I was an aspiring libertarian and even donated to Gary Johnson. Besides my strong Randian beliefs, I also loved computer programming, so cryptocurrency was a natural fit for me. The spirit of cypherpunk attracted me. The idea of Bitcoin as a private wealth bank fascinated me—being able to carry a billion dollars in my mind across borders has always been an incredibly powerful concept to me.

However, over time, I felt I lost my initial purpose in the crypto industry. After diving into this field full-time, the enticing early promises about the transformative power of cryptocurrency gradually faded. I became disillusioned with the target users and who we were truly serving. I completely misunderstood who the real users of cryptocurrency were and mistook propaganda for reality. Cryptocurrency claimed to decentralize the financial system, and I bought into it completely, but in reality, it is just a super system for speculation and gambling, a mirror of the real economy.

Reality hit me like a truck. I wasn't building a new financial system at all; I was building a casino, a casino that doesn't call itself a casino, but it is the largest, 24/7, most participatory casino ever created by our generation. Part of me hoped I could at least be proud of spending my entire twenties building this casino, but another part of me felt I completely wasted my twenties. I wasted my life on this—but at least, I made a lot of money from it.

Watch What They Do, Not What They Say

Cryptocurrency is a confusing thing. On one hand, you hear proponents say they want to completely replace the existing financial system with on-chain systems. I can still imagine that world—your bank account holds only USDC or Bitcoin, and you can send a billion dollars to anyone in the world in seconds. This vision is still powerful, and I still agree with it.

But the incentives have completely distorted the direction of reality. In practice, all market participants are happy to throw money into funding the next so-called "Layer 1" (Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, etc.). The only winner of the 2020 Layer 1 war was Solana, which fueled a strong speculative drive to compete for the fourth spot (after Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, ??), supporting a market cap of hundreds of billions of dollars.

But did this really move us closer to the ideal new financial system? Despite VCs writing 5,000-word essays trying to convince you, the answer is no. This didn't create a new system; in fact, it burned through the funds of everyone (both retail and VCs), making everyone in the new system poorer.

I'm not just targeting Layer 1s. I could cite countless similar examples: spot DEXs, perpetual futures DEXs, prediction markets, meme platforms, etc. The fierce competition in these tracks does not substantially lead to a better financial system. Contrary to what VCs say, we don't need to build casinos on Mars.

The Gamblification of Economic Models

If I said I had no financial motivation when I first joined the crypto industry, I would be lying. As a reader, you might think it's a bit hypocritical for me to decide to leave the industry after making enough money. Yes, maybe I am hypocritical, but maybe I'm just disgusted with myself for contributing to this quagmire of financialization and gamblification.

Normalizing zero-sum behavior of "quickly making money off each other" is not a way to create long-term wealth. It seems like it is, but it's not. Eight years in crypto have completely destroyed my ability to recognize sustainable business models. Here, you don't need a successful business or product to make money. This industry has a long list of tokens with high market caps and zero users—this completely defies the logic of how the real world operates. If you want to bring value to customers, not just gambling + entertainment (which is what casinos do), these zero-sum business models simply don't work.

Conclusion

I used to think "financial nihilism" was a cute and harmless concept. I thought it was okay to keep pushing zero-sum games onto the next generation. I have no doubt that Bitcoin will eventually reach $1 million one day, but that has nothing to do with the financial games the industry is creating.

This industry mindset is extremely toxic, and I believe it will lead to a long-term collapse of social mobility for the younger generation. You can already see it happening, and we must have the courage to resist these meaningless games.

CMS Holdings once famously said: "Are you here to make money? Or are you here to prove you're right?"

This time, I choose to prove I'm right.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main criticism of the crypto industry according to Ken Chan?

AKen Chan criticizes the crypto industry for losing its original idealistic vision of creating a decentralized financial system and instead becoming the largest, most participatory global casino focused on speculation and gambling, which he finds morally repugnant.

QHow did Ken Chan's initial political and philosophical beliefs influence his entry into crypto?

AAs a libertarian influenced by Ayn Rand's works like 'The Fountainhead' and 'Atlas Shrugged,' Ken Chan was drawn to cryptocurrency's promise of private wealth storage and borderless value transfer, aligning with his ideals of individual freedom and anti-establishment principles.

QWhat does Ken Chan mean by 'look at what they do, not what they say' in the context of crypto?

AHe means that despite the industry's rhetoric about building a new financial system, the actual incentives and actions—such as pouring money into speculative Layer 1 projects like Aptos or Sui—reveal a focus on zero-sum gambling and wealth extraction rather than genuine innovation or user value.

QWhy does Ken Chan feel he wasted his time in the crypto industry despite making money?

AHe feels he wasted his time because he realized he was contributing to a harmful, gambling-driven ecosystem that prioritizes short-term speculation over sustainable value creation, which contradicts his original goal of building a meaningful decentralized financial system.

QWhat societal concern does Ken Chan raise about the impact of crypto on younger generations?

AHe warns that the normalization of zero-sum, gambling-like behavior in crypto could lead to a long-term collapse in social mobility for younger generations, as it encourages financial nihilism and distracts from productive economic activities.

Related Reads

AI Deceives with Perfection: How Can Crypto Users Defend Against New Scams?

AI has made crypto scams more sophisticated by generating flawless text and realistic interfaces, rendering traditional detection methods like spotting typos and grammar errors obsolete. Scammers now use AI for polished phishing emails, fake customer service chats, and convincing websites. Crypto users face unique risks as blockchain transactions are irreversible, and attackers can steal assets simply by tricking users into authorizing malicious transactions. To defend against these advanced threats, users must adopt rigorous verification habits: - Carefully check website URLs for subtle spoofing. - Use only official links and channels. - Scrutinize all wallet permissions and token approvals before signing. - Verify contract addresses directly from trusted sources, not token names. - Ignore unsolicited private messages posing as customer support. - Treat urgent requests with extreme skepticism. The core principle is that a professional appearance no longer equals safety. In the AI era, security hinges on proactive verification of every link, transaction, and communication, not on trusting surface-level credibility.

marsbit9m ago

AI Deceives with Perfection: How Can Crypto Users Defend Against New Scams?

marsbit9m ago

Turn Off AI Before the Interview: What Kind of People is Anthropic Looking For?

"Shut Off AI Before the Interview: What Kind of People Anthropic Is Screening For" Anthropic, now the world's most valuable AI startup, has an exceptionally competitive hiring process. A key and distinctive element is its mandatory "culture interview," conducted without AI assistance. This interview focuses not on technical skills, but on assessing a candidate's core values, worldview, and perspective on long-term AI risks. Questions delve deeply into personal ethics, "unusual beliefs," and the candidate's willingness to thoughtfully critique Anthropic's own mission. The goal is to evaluate whether someone's convictions are genuinely their own and if they can articulate and defend them under pressure. A poor score here can veto otherwise successful technical interviews. This approach starkly contrasts with companies like Google, which now encourages using AI in interviews to assess "AI fluency." Anthropic's philosophy suggests that in an era where AI makes execution cheap and the generation of opinions nearly free, true scarcity lies in original, deeply held thought. The company seeks individuals who possess substance "after turning off the AI"—those who haven't outsourced their core thinking. This focus on aligning fundamental values contributes to Anthropic's high employee retention rate in a fast-moving industry.

marsbit13m ago

Turn Off AI Before the Interview: What Kind of People is Anthropic Looking For?

marsbit13m ago

In the Last 2 Minutes Before SK Hynix Market Open, TradeXYZ Achieved Price Accuracy Within 0.13%

Traditionally, asset price discovery halts when markets close. However, decentralized exchanges like Hyperliquid, enabling 24/7 trading of Real-World Asset (RWA) perpetuals, are changing this. A case study involving SK Hynix stock on Hyperliquid's xyz:SKHX market demonstrates this shift during a weekend when the Korean Exchange (KRX) was closed. While the KRX closed at 2,070,000 KRW on June 5th, active trading continued on-chain. By 08:56 KST on Monday, June 8th, just before the KRX open, the chain price had fallen to 1200.0 USDC, implying a -10.21% drop. Three minutes later, the KRX opened at 1,856,000 KRW, an actual drop of -10.34%. The on-chain price had predicted the opening decline with remarkable accuracy, missing by only 0.13 percentage points. In the final two minutes before the open (08:58-08:59 KST), the on-chain market saw a significant volume spike and a +2.31% price rebound. This wasn't a prediction error but likely the market front-running the expected post-open bounce. Indeed, after opening at its low, the KRX price rebounded approximately +2.64% by 09:03 KST. This event illustrates how 24/7 on-chain markets can act as a leading price discovery venue, not only anticipating opening prices but also trading the immediate post-open dynamics before traditional markets even begin.

marsbit24m ago

In the Last 2 Minutes Before SK Hynix Market Open, TradeXYZ Achieved Price Accuracy Within 0.13%

marsbit24m ago

Farewell to Traditional Bulls and Bears: The Market Has Entered an Era of Rotating Bubbles

Farewell to traditional bull and bear markets; we have entered an era of rolling bubbles. This article uses a meteorological analogy to explain the modern market's shift from slow-moving, long-term trends to a chain of rapid, successive speculative frenzies. The old market resembled "stratiform" weather—slow, broad cycles lasting years. Today's market is like a "mesoscale convective system," where isolated storms (bubbles in sectors like AI, GLP-1 drugs, or crypto) form in sequence. Each is triggered by the outflow of capital and sentiment from the previous one, creating a self-perpetuating chain of booms and busts. This structural change is driven by eight permanent shifts: the democratization of speculation (zero-commission trading, retail options activity), perpetual buying from defined-contribution retirement plans, the dominance of passive investing (creating price-insensitive flows), the rise of multi-strategy funds and high-frequency trading (weakening price discovery), suppressed volatility that erupts violently, an index composition now dominated by long-duration, narrative-driven tech stocks, the elimination of information delays, and a permissive fiscal/monetary backdrop. These conditions ensure that rolling bubbles are the new normal. To navigate this environment, investors should either become deep-sector experts who understand the underlying technologies and business models or become adept observers of trends and capital flows. While chaotic from within each "storm," a higher-altitude view reveals a predictable pattern of serial booms. The key is to avoid being emotionally swept up in any single narrative and to recognize the market's new, permanent structure.

marsbit25m ago

Farewell to Traditional Bulls and Bears: The Market Has Entered an Era of Rotating Bubbles

marsbit25m ago

The Right Way to Use Skills: 5 Reflections After Anthropic Publicly Shared Its Internal Methodology

A deep dive into Anthropic's internal methodology for building effective AI "Skills" reveals five key insights for maximizing their value. First, Skills should focus on capturing "Gotchas" and tacit organizational knowledge—like common pitfalls and undocumented rules—rather than restating general information the AI already knows. Second, think of Skills as a form of "Context Engineering"; they are best structured as folders, not monolithic documents. A core `SKILL.md` file should act as a navigational index, progressively pulling in detailed references, examples, and assets only as needed to avoid overwhelming the model's context window. Third, whenever possible, automate repetitive tasks with scripts. This preserves the model's reasoning capacity for judgment and analysis, while scripts reliably handle the execution, saving tokens and improving accuracy. Instructions within a Skill provide the "why" and the expert judgment, while scripts provide the concrete "how." Fourth, a Skill's description is critical and often misunderstood. It should not be a list of features but a routing rule that clearly signals *when* the Skill should be triggered based on user intent and common phrasing. Finally, as Skills scale from personal tools to team-wide assets, management is crucial. Anthropic advocates for a lightweight, organic approach: let new Skills spread organically within small groups first. Those that prove genuinely useful through adoption naturally graduate to a formal marketplace, ensuring the curated library contains only high-value, battle-tested tools.

marsbit42m ago

The Right Way to Use Skills: 5 Reflections After Anthropic Publicly Shared Its Internal Methodology

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow