BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-27Last updated on 2026-06-27

Abstract

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stro...

Bitcoin mining is currently undergoing the most complex structural adjustment since the protocol's inception. Despite Bitcoin's price remaining around $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching 1 ZH/s—near an all-time high—miner profitability continues to deteriorate. Indicators such as production costs, transaction fee revenue, hash rate expansion, and industry security budgets all show that the mining sector is operating close to the breakeven point, and the 2028 halving may further accelerate industry consolidation.

Current data reveals that the challenges facing the industry stem not only from the reduction in block subsidies due to halving but also from the incomplete transition to a fee-driven revenue structure. Meanwhile, an increasing number of mining companies are shifting from being mere Bitcoin producers to infrastructure operators, energy operators, and AI/HPC computing infrastructure providers. In this process, the focus of mining competition is gradually shifting from hash rate expansion to business model upgrades.

Profitability Under Persistent Pressure: Mining's Economic Model Enters a Revaluation Phase

The PoW difficulty/issuance model indicates that Bitcoin's current lower bound for production cost is approximately $46,744. Historically, whenever the price has fallen near this level, it often signaled the exit of marginal miners and corresponded with the formation of a cyclical bottom. However, what is more noteworthy now is that miner revenue and Bitcoin price have shown a historically unprecedented and sustained divergence.

Data shows that at a Bitcoin price of around $61,000, the theoretical daily revenue for all network miners should be approximately $78 million, but the actual figure is only about $33 million—a difference of roughly 136%. Meanwhile, while the network hash rate is nearing 1 ZH/s, transaction fee revenue remains persistently low, currently averaging only about $220,000 per day, far below the roughly $9.7 million implied by historical relationships. As halving continues to compress new issuance, Bitcoin mining faces increasing profitability pressure.

From Mining to Infrastructure: The 2028 Halving May Drive Industry Restructuring

In addition to declining revenue, cost pressures on mining companies are also rising. In 2025, total revenue for Bitcoin miners was approximately $17.2 billion, of which electricity costs alone accounted for about $12.3 billion, or 71.5% of total revenue; global mining hardware investment was approximately $4.5 billion. A comprehensive analysis estimates that the industry's overall breakeven price is currently around $65,000, meaning that relying solely on mining operations is difficult to sustain ideal profitability levels at the current price.

It is estimated that after the 2028 halving, Bitcoin's production cost lower bound will further rise to approximately $93,289, accelerating industry concentration towards a few large, well-capitalized mining companies with diversified revenue streams. Compared to traditional miners reliant on block rewards, institutionalized miners with access to low-cost electricity, AI/HPC compute hosting businesses, and stronger balance sheet capabilities may gain a stronger competitive advantage in the new cycle.

Overall, the Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing a profound transformation from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." As block subsidies continue to decline, relying solely on Bitcoin production can no longer support long-term profitability. The industry's future will increasingly depend on diversified revenue sources such as energy management and AI/HPC compute hosting. For investors, what is truly worth watching is not just the halving itself, but which mining companies can successfully complete their business model transformation and establish more resilient competitive advantages within the new industry landscape.

The views above are partly sourced from BIT on Target. Contact us to obtain the full BIT on Target report.

Disclaimer: Markets carry risks; investing requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Trading digital assets can be highly risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of individual circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. BIT assumes no responsibility for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason for the deteriorating profitability of Bitcoin miners despite high Bitcoin prices and hash rates?

AThe primary reason is that the industry's revenue structure has not yet completed the transition to being fee-driven. Block subsidy rewards are decreasing due to halvings, while transaction fee income remains persistently low, leading to a divergence between miner revenue and Bitcoin's price.

QWhat are the two key price levels mentioned in the article related to Bitcoin mining economics?

AThe article mentions the current estimated production cost floor of approximately $46,744 and the industry's overall breakeven price of around $65,000.

QWhat major shift in business models are Bitcoin mining companies undergoing, as described in the article?

AMining companies are shifting from being pure Bitcoin producers to becoming infrastructure operators. This includes diversifying into energy operations and AI/HPC (High-Performance Computing) compute infrastructure providers.

QHow does the article suggest the 2028 halving will impact the structure of the Bitcoin mining industry?

AThe 2028 halving is expected to accelerate industry consolidation. It will push the production cost floor higher (to ~$93,289), favoring large, well-capitalized mining firms with diversified revenue streams (like low-cost energy and AI/HPC hosting) over traditional miners reliant solely on block rewards.

QWhat does the data show about the relationship between theoretical and actual daily miner revenue at a Bitcoin price of ~$61,000?

AAt a Bitcoin price of ~$61,000, the theoretical daily miner revenue should be about $78 million, but the actual revenue is only about $33 million. This means the theoretical revenue is approximately 136% higher than the actual revenue.

Related Reads

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbit1h ago

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbit1h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbit2h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

471 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片