The Heart of the 'Artificial Sun': China Builds Largest Magnet for Fusion Reactor

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-28Last updated on 2026-07-28

Abstract

On June 27, 2026, China's Institute of Plasma Physics announced the successful development and comprehensive testing of two key superconducting magnets for its "artificial sun" fusion reactor project. These magnets are crucial for containing plasma exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius within a vacuum chamber using powerful magnetic fields. The first is a D-shaped toroidal field magnet, claimed to be the world's largest for a fusion reactor. Measuring 21m long and weighing 582 tons, it has 1.3 times the volume and triple the stored energy of its counterpart in the international ITER project. Key parameters include a 98 kA operating current and 120 GJ of stored energy. Sixteen such magnets will eventually form a ring generating a central field of 6.5 Tesla to confine the plasma. Concurrently tested was a high-temperature superconducting central solenoid. It stably carries 60 kA of current and plays a critical role in inducing and sustaining the plasma current, essentially "igniting" the fusion reaction. All key technologies and materials are domestically developed, with 47 patents filed. The magnets are destined for the BEST (Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak) device, with assembly planned by 2027 and a demonstration of power generation targeted for around 2030. Fusion is pursued as a potential source of vast, clean energy without long-lived radioactive waste. While this marks a significant technical achievement, the article's concluding AI perspective not...

On June 27, 2026, the Institute of Plasma Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ASIPP) in Hefei, Anhui province, completed the development and full parametric testing of two key superconducting magnets for a fusion reactor as part of the 'Artificial Sun' project. The institute itself announced this news.

Put simply: for nuclear fusion to work, you need to confine plasma at temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius so that it doesn't touch the walls of the chamber. No material can withstand such heat, so the plasma is 'levitated' in a vacuum using a powerful magnetic field. Superconducting magnets are precisely what's needed to create this field – the more powerful they are, the more stably and for longer the reaction can be sustained.

Toroidal Magnet: A Record-Holder in Volume and Energy

The first of the tested components is a Toroidal Field (TF) superconducting magnet. It has a D-shape, measures 21 meters in length, 12 meters in width, and 3.3 meters in height, and weighs 582 tons. The developers call it the world's largest superconducting magnet for a fusion reactor: its volume is 1.3 times larger and its stored energy is 3 times higher than that of a similar magnet for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in France – the world's most famous and expensive fusion project.

The parameters of a single such magnet are impressive:

  • Operating current – 98 kiloamperes;
  • Stored energy – 120 gigajoules;
  • Maximum field on the magnet itself – 14.5 tesla;
  • Design lifespan for stable operation – 60 years under conditions of ultra-low temperatures, high currents, strong radiation, and mechanical loads.

In the future, 16 such magnets will be assembled into a ring – it will create a magnetic field with a strength of 6.5 tesla at the center of the plasma. It is this field that is meant to hold the superheated matter inside the vacuum chamber, preventing it from destroying the reactor walls.

The Solenoid That Ignites and Sustains the Plasma

In parallel with the toroidal magnet, full testing was completed on a high-temperature superconducting central solenoid. This component stably conducts a current of 60 kiloamperes, its stored energy is 6.03 megajoules, its maximum field ramp rate reaches 5.1 tesla per second, and the resistance of its joints is only 0.87 nano-ohms.

If the toroidal magnet confines the plasma in the shape of a ring, the central solenoid is responsible for another task: it induces and sustains the plasma current itself, and also regulates its shape. Without this element, there would simply be nothing to 'ignite' the reaction with.

Fully Chinese Technologies and Patents

The developers emphasize that all key technologies, materials – including superconducting tapes, special steel, and insulation – and production processes are entirely domestic. The development took six years, during which 47 patents were obtained and 14 standards were developed.

Both magnets will become part of the Comprehensive Research Facility for Fusion Technology (CRAFT) and are intended for the Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST). The assembly of BEST is planned to be completed by the end of 2027, with a demonstration of electricity generation from nuclear fusion expected around 2030.

Why All This Is Needed

Nuclear fusion is the same reaction that powers the Sun and stars: light atomic nuclei fuse into heavier ones, releasing enormous energy. Unlike nuclear fission power plants, which use the decay of heavy nuclei, a fusion reaction does not produce long-lived radioactive waste and is considered a source of practically inexhaustible clean energy.

The magnets tested in Hefei are not a ready-made power plant, but a key technical element on the path to one. The Institute of Plasma Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has demonstrated its ability to build superconducting components that surpass even the international ITER project in scale, entirely on its own technological base.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of macroeconomic comparisons, the fusion race appears not only as a 'race of magnets' but also a race of financing models. While the Chinese project is scaling up with state funding, the American company Commonwealth Fusion Systems already tested a compact high-temperature superconducting magnet reaching 20 tesla in 2021 and later raised $1.8 billion in private investment based on this result. The difference in approaches is fundamental: betting on scale and low-temperature superconductivity versus betting on compactness and ReBCO materials that reduce cooling costs. The historical experience of fusion programs, from the first tokamaks in the 1960s to budget freezes in the 1980s, suggests that the decisive factor has more often been not the power of the magnet, but the sustainability of funding over a timescale of decades. Which model – state-led or venture-backed – will bring fusion power to the electrical grid faster?

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the toroidal magnetic field (TF) magnet developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences?

AIts main purpose is to create a powerful magnetic field to confine super-hot plasma, preventing it from contacting and damaging the walls of the reactor's vacuum chamber during fusion.

QHow do the key parameters of China's new toroidal field (TF) magnet compare to those of the ITER project's similar magnet?

AChina's TF magnet has a volume 1.3 times larger and stores three times more energy than the comparable magnet used in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project in France.

QWhat specific roles do the toroidal field (TF) magnet and the central solenoid play in a fusion reactor like the planned BEST?

AThe toroidal field magnet is responsible for shaping and confining the plasma ring. The central solenoid induces and maintains the plasma current, essentially 'igniting' and stabilizing the fusion reaction.

QWhat key technological achievement does the article highlight about the development of these magnets?

AThe article highlights that all key technologies, materials (including superconducting tapes, special steel, and insulation), and manufacturing processes are fully domestic Chinese developments, supported by 47 patents and 14 standards.

QAccording to the AI opinion section, what are the two contrasting approaches in the 'fusion race' mentioned, and what is the critical factor for success according to historical experience?

AThe two approaches are China's state-funded model focusing on scale and low-temperature superconductivity versus the US venture-backed model (like Commonwealth Fusion Systems) focusing on compactness and high-temperature superconducting materials (ReBCO). The historical experience suggests that sustained, long-term funding over decades is more critical than just magnet power for ultimate success.

Related Reads

E Fund "Quits Drinking"

"Yi Fang Da 'Gives Up Alcohol'" - Summary The article analyzes the recent portfolio adjustments of star fund manager Zhang Kun, focusing on his flagship funds, the Yi Fang Da Blue Chip Select and Yi Fang Da Quality Select. The key trend highlighted is a significant and ongoing reduction in exposure to the consumer sector, particularly liquor (baijiu) stocks like Kweichow Moutai and Wuliangye, which were once core holdings. This shift is driven by several factors: a downturn in the consumer sector's business cycle post-pandemic, with slowing earnings growth for major players; a change in consumer behavior towards value over premium brands; and high channel inventory pressures, especially in the liquor industry. These fundamentals have led to a prolonged phase of valuation contraction for consumer stocks. Concurrently, market capital has rotated aggressively towards the high-growth technology sector, especially AI-related chains, which have dominated fund inflows. This style shift has further diminished the attractiveness of traditional consumer "core assets" for many funds. As a result, Zhang Kun's funds have drastically cut their consumer stock allocations. For example, the Blue Chip Select's baijiu holding proportion has fallen from over 40% to around 20%, and its overall top 10 holdings concentration dropped sharply. This mirrors a broader trend in the active equity fund industry, where allocations to consumer staples have plummeted to multi-year lows while technology holdings have surged. The article concludes that while the consumer sector's valuations are now at historical lows, offering some margin of safety, the fundamental outlook remains challenging due to weak macro consumption recovery and intense internal competition. Therefore, the sector is likely to see only sporadic rebounds rather than a sustained recovery, continuing to weigh on the performance of funds still heavily invested in it. Zhang Kun's timely reduction of Korean semiconductor holdings in his Asia Select fund amid a market crash is also noted as a contrast to his domestic strategy.

marsbit20m ago

E Fund "Quits Drinking"

marsbit20m ago

Before the Second Attempt at Hong Kong IPO, Topstar 'Hands Out' 548 Million in Related-Party Orders

Tosda, an industrial robotics firm, is making its second attempt at a Hong Kong listing shortly after its first application lapsed. The company has undergone a significant strategic shift, pivoting away from its lower-margin intelligent energy and environmental management system (IEEMS) business to focus on core robotics and machinery. This "revenue-reduction, profit-growth" strategy saw revenue nearly halve from 2022 to 2025, but resulted in a sharp turnaround to profitability, with a 1147% year-on-year increase in Q1 2026 net profit. This restructuring involved spinning off the IEEMS business, leading to a substantial jump in related-party transactions. Following the departure of a former executive, two newly associated companies are expected to handle up to 548 million RMB worth of IEEMS orders in 2026, with Tosda acting as a platform charging a 3% management fee. While profitability has improved, several financial concerns remain. Accounts receivable collection cycles have lengthened, inventory—particularly for robots—has surged significantly despite falling revenue, and the company faces challenges in overseas market expansion. Notably, overseas business currently has a lower gross margin than domestic operations. The company was also recently reprimanded by regulators for accounting inaccuracies related to revenue recognition and bad debt provisions. The success of its strategic pivot and its second listing attempt will depend on managing these financial risks, the transparency of its new business model, and the long-term performance of its core robotics segment.

marsbit30m ago

Before the Second Attempt at Hong Kong IPO, Topstar 'Hands Out' 548 Million in Related-Party Orders

marsbit30m ago

Is the AI Bull Market in Jeopardy? Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Breaks Below Key Support at 11,200 Points

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) faces a critical technical and fundamental test. It recently breached a key short-term support level around 11,200 points—a level that held in mid-July—and closed below it. Technical indicators have deteriorated, with the 21-day moving average crossing below the 50-day, signaling bearish momentum. Should the 11,200 support fail, the next major support is the 200-day moving average. The sell-off, which saw memory chip stocks like Micron and Western Digital plunge over 10%, stems from growing concerns about the cyclicality and quality of AI demand. Market participants question the sustainability of the AI capital expenditure boom, highlighted by divergences between the capital expenditures of mega-cap tech firms and semiconductor index performance. However, some positive structural shifts are emerging. Institutional positioning has normalized, unwinding the previously crowded "long semiconductors, short Mag 7" trade, leaving cleaner positioning. Seasonal tailwinds are also approaching, as the NDX historically performs well after this period, potentially supporting a rebound if retail inflows resume. The core question is whether the SOX can hold the 11,200 support. A failure could trigger further declines toward the 200-day moving average, while a successful defense, combined with lighter positioning and seasonal support, could offer a recovery window for the sector.

marsbit30m ago

Is the AI Bull Market in Jeopardy? Philadelphia Semiconductor Index Breaks Below Key Support at 11,200 Points

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片