Cardano (ADA) Founder Charles Hoskinson Issues Critical Warning Regarding Bitcoin (BTC): "If It Cannot Adapt, It May Lose Its Leadership!"

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-27Last updated on 2026-07-27

Abstract

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano (ADA), has issued a critical warning regarding Bitcoin (BTC). He stated that Bitcoin's most significant upcoming challenge will come from the advancement of quantum computing technology. Hoskinson argued that Bitcoin's governance model makes it difficult to implement major network upgrades, and if the network fails to adapt in time, it could lose its position as the world's leading cryptocurrency. In contrast, Hoskinson positioned Cardano as Bitcoin's "spiritual successor," designed to address technical shortcomings while preserving Bitcoin's core philosophy. He emphasized Cardano's on-chain governance system as a key advantage, claiming it allows the ADA community to vote and implement necessary protocol changes—such as quantum-resistant cryptography—more swiftly and cohesively. This adaptability, he suggests, could allow Cardano to better navigate future technological threats and potentially gain a long-term competitive edge.

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano and known as one of the most outspoken figures in the cryptocurrency market, has made significant statements about Bitcoin and $ADA.

In a recent appearance on The Starting Block program, Hoskinson stated that the most serious challenge for Bitcoin will be related to the development of quantum computing technology, and that if the network cannot make the necessary updates in time, it could lose its title as the world's largest cryptocurrency.

At this point, Hoskinson argues that Bitcoin's biggest shortcoming is its governance model. In this context, he contends that Bitcoin's governance model makes it difficult to implement substantial changes to the network, and that with the advancement of quantum computing, quantum computers could begin to threaten the existing cryptographic infrastructure.

Hoskinson acknowledged that since its creation, Bitcoin has overcome numerous difficulties, including pressure from regulators, market crashes, and the disappearance of its founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, but noted that quantum computing presents different risks. He stated that this threat can only be overcome through coordinated, network-wide technical upgrades.

In conclusion, Hoskinson notes that if the Bitcoin community cannot agree on the necessary updates, the network could lose its competitive edge and, in the long term, cede leadership to other blockchains.

Cardano Positions Itself as Bitcoin's Successor!

Drawing parallels between Bitcoin and Cardano, Charles Hoskinson argued that Cardano was designed to solve technical challenges that have emerged over time while preserving Bitcoin's core philosophy.

Hoskinson, who calls Cardano the "spiritual successor to Bitcoin," claims that Cardano has addressed some of the problems that Nakamoto was unable to solve due to a lack of experience and time constraints.

In conclusion, Hoskinson stated that the on-chain governance system is one of Cardano's most significant advantages. He explained that, should a transition to quantum-attack-resistant infrastructure become necessary, the $ADA community can quickly and easily make the required protocol changes through on-chain voting, and that such a structure will allow for faster adaptation to future technological threats.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat specific warning did Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, issue regarding Bitcoin (BTC)?

ACharles Hoskinson warned that if Bitcoin cannot adapt, particularly to the development of quantum computing technology, it risks losing its position as the world's largest cryptocurrency.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what is Bitcoin's biggest drawback in facing future challenges like quantum computing?

AHoskinson stated that Bitcoin's biggest drawback is its governance model, which makes it difficult to implement substantial and necessary changes to the network in a timely manner.

QHow does Hoskinson position Cardano (ADA) in relation to Bitcoin?

AHoskinson positions Cardano as the 'spiritual successor' to Bitcoin, designed to address technical challenges that have emerged over time while maintaining Bitcoin's core philosophy, and claims it has solved issues Satoshi Nakamoto could not.

QWhat key advantage of Cardano does Hoskinson highlight for adapting to future technological threats?

AHoskinson highlights Cardano's on-chain governance system as a key advantage, allowing the ADA community to quickly and easily vote on and implement necessary protocol changes, such as transitioning to quantum-resistant cryptography.

QWhat specific future technological development does Hoskinson identify as the most serious test for Bitcoin?

AHoskinson identifies the development of quantum computing technology as the most serious future test for Bitcoin, as quantum computers could threaten its existing cryptographic infrastructure.

Related Reads

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbit13m ago

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbit13m ago

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit22m ago

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit22m ago

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit23m ago

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit23m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片