The First Step to Becoming an On-Chain Bank: Polymarket Launches Native Stablecoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, has announced a major upgrade involving the replacement of its current collateral, USDC.e, with its own native stablecoin, Polymarket USD (pegged 1:1 to USDC). This transition, expected within 2-3 weeks, is designed to be seamless for most users. The introduction of its own stablecoin allows Polymarket to consolidate user funds within its own ecosystem, transforming from merely facilitating trades to holding and managing the underlying capital. This shift enables the platform to potentially generate significant revenue from the yield on the reserve assets (USDC), estimated to be tens of millions annually from its current ~$400M in open interest. This moves its business model beyond transaction fees, which recently surpassed $1M daily, towards earning "interest" on deposited funds. Furthermore, controlling a large pool of stablecoins grants Polymarket greater leverage in its relationship with Circle (issuer of USDC) and could pave the way for future financial services. This strategic upgrade signifies Polymarket's evolution from a prediction market ("casino logic") into a more comprehensive financial entity with banking-like capabilities ("bank logic"), significantly deepening its competitive moat.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

On April 6, Polymarket announced a major upgrade to the platform in the next 2 to 3 weeks, including upgrading both CTF and CLOB to V2, and replacing the platform collateral from USDC.e to the native stablecoin Polymarket USD.

According to the official introduction, Polymarket USD is 1:1 backed by USDC. For most users, the transition from USDC.e to Polymarket USD is seamless, with the frontend handling it automatically—users only need to confirm once. For advanced users and API-only traders, the transition process might be a bit more complex but still not difficult; they need to wrap their USDC or USDC.e into Polymarket USD through the wrap() function of the collateral access contract.

On the surface, it seems like Polymarket is just changing the trading collateral in the backend. As the platform grows, continuing to use USDC.e is indeed a potential risk. Back in February, Circle and Polymarket had already announced plans to migrate from bridged USDC.e to native USDC, and this is just a normal progression of that cooperation.

However, Polymarket did not choose to directly introduce native USDC to replace USDC.e; instead, it added an extra layer, aiming to pool USDC into its own fund pool. This layer is called Polymarket USD. Therefore, the emergence of Polymarket USD is definitely a "One more thing"(Odaily Note: "One more thing" is a classic tradition of Apple keynotes, now symbolizing a company's finale, industry-disrupting moves, etc.).

Polymarket Gains the Right to Mint Currency

The first layer of significance is that Polymarket can pool user funds.

Previously, the money users deposited into Polymarket would be converted into USDC.e. You can think of it as Polymarket being a huge trading venue—it only handles matching, pricing, and清算; the money flows through it, but the money itself does not belong to its system. Polymarket is not a treasury.

But that's about to change. When USDC.e is replaced with Polymarket USD, Polymarket can reach out to that money which was merely "passing through." As Polymarket officially stated, the daily user experience is unaffected, but the actual on-chain settlement path behind the scenes has been altered. This transformation is no less significant than an exchange transitioning from relying on third-party清算机构 to building its own清算 center.

Polymarket USD is 1:1 backed by USDC, meaning that in the future, for every Polymarket USD in the market, there will be a corresponding USDC in Polymarket's fund pool. Currently, every Yes/No share pair on Polymarket is backed by USDC.e. When players place bets or settle, USDC.e also moves on-chain. But after switching to Polymarket USD, although it will also flow on-chain with user operations, the USDC in Polymarket's fund pool won't move accordingly. Therefore, as long as users don't come to redeem, this money is essentially Polymarket's.

Polymarket has transformed from a use case for stablecoins to an entity that holds the on-chain minting right. Polymarket USD diverts user assets from the "open sea" to Polymarket's "internal lake." Once funds begin to pool, Polymarket is no longer just a prediction trading platform, and its business model no longer relies solely on trading fees, because it can start playing the oldest "money makes money" game in the financial markets.

Increasing Polymarket's Revenue Channels

The second layer of significance is the expansion of Polymarket's business.

The current business model of prediction markets is simple: charging transaction fees. After Polymarket adjusted its fee mechanism on March 30(Odaily Note: Expanding the taker fee scope to include Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, Weather, and other market categories, in addition to the original Crypto and Sports categories), its daily fee income has exceeded $1 million.

Polymarket's Daily Fee Income

Although impressive, it's not enough to satisfy Polymarket's ambitions. Prediction markets are currently the most sought-after赛道, but the business model ceiling isn't very high, the project's moat is relatively单一 (regulatory approval), and user stickiness isn't exceptionally strong. In the current landscape where everyone is doing prediction markets, how can Polymarket ensure it won't be surpassed by competitors in the future?

The answer it gives now is: I don't just match trades; I can also put players' money to work.

From a business essence perspective, the most attractive aspect of stablecoins over the years has never been fast payments and transfers, but the低调 yet highly profitable money-printing machine behind them—reserve asset yield. In 2025, the vast majority of Circle's income still came from reserve income. Polymarket understood this model, hence it launched Polymarket USD.

According to Dune data, the value of open interest on the Polymarket platform has exceeded $400 million. If all this money is converted into Polymarket USD, Polymarket simply needs to deposit the underlying collateral USDC into Circle's institutional account or place it in a U.S. Treasury protocol. At a risk-free rate of 4%-5%, it could earn tens of millions of dollars in "interest tax" annually just by sitting back.

Defillama founder 0xngmi even directly stated that Polymarket user wallets hold approximately $1.25 billion. If they keep this interest income, at current rates, they would gain an additional $54 million in annual revenue. Polymarket could even participate in DeFi wealth management with higher APYs, turning the idle funds on the prediction platform into active leverage and returning the到期收益 to users, effectively providing a hedge for users.

Polymarket's Daily OI and Trading Volume Curve

Prediction markets naturally have two characteristics: fund滞留 and high-frequency reallocation driven by events. Users' money doesn't truly enter and exit instantly like in a casino; it's either already in positions or sitting in accounts waiting for the next event, the next odds change. This type of money is most suitable for financial reprocessing, and for users, there's also a beautiful excuse: improving capital efficiency.

Of course, Polymarket hasn't publicly stated yet that it will definitely engage in yield extraction or on-chain wealth management after launching the stablecoin. But this path is almost a natural next step. As long as the scale of Polymarket USD grows larger in the future, it naturally gains the space to manage yields, expand collateral, and create financial combinations within the platform.

Some time ago, the《CLARITY Act》faced resistance for potentially prohibiting crypto companies from offering interest on stablecoins to users. If the outcome of the dispute remains a prohibition, all the above演绎 of Polymarket USD's potential would come to naught. But on April 6, according to U.S. media reports, the core disagreement between the U.S. crypto industry and banking over stablecoin yield mechanisms may be nearing resolution. Although details have not been disclosed, overall expectations are optimistic, and the《CLARITY Act》may enter the deliberation stage in committee in late April.

So, don't think Polymarket is far from this.

Polymarket Gains USDC Distribution Rights

The launch of the stablecoin by Polymarket has a third layer of significance: gaining USDC distribution rights.

As of today, Polymarket is still a major distribution scenario within the USDC ecosystem. Circle provides native USDC, Polymarket distributes USDC, and both sides are harmonious. Polymarket is currently experiencing strong growth momentum. Undoubtedly, the amount of USDC reserves沉淀 within its platform will grow larger in the future, potentially even becoming a distribution channel as important as Coinbase. When that time truly comes, the relationship between Polymarket and Circle might also change.

A reality in the stablecoin world is that distribution rights are as important as issuance rights, which is why Coinbase can take away over half of Circle's reserve income. Therefore, in the future, when Polymarket becomes a significant distributor of USDC, it will inevitably also gain bargaining power and be entitled to a large share of the reserve income. Furthermore, when Polymarket USD matures sufficiently, it could even explore multi-collateral backed stablecoins, not just relying solely on USDC.

This is also why I believe Polymarket USD is not an ordinary upgrade for Polymarket, but an identity update. Polymarket will evolve from "a platform collecting fees based on event volatility" to one that also兼具 "a platform organizing and清算 around the dollar".

The former is casino logic, while the latter is bank logic.

Polymarket's moat has thus gained another layer. It still maintains the beautiful narrative of information as the market and pricing facts early. But in terms of its business model, it is quietly moving itself to a more important position—no longer satisfied with being surface-level market traffic, no longer satisfied with仅仅 attracting users with odds, and no longer satisfied with continuing to cede the fattest part of the industry chain (asset reserve income) to others.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary reason Polymarket is introducing its native stablecoin, Polymarket USD?

APolymarket is introducing Polymarket USD to transition from using USDC.e as collateral to a native stablecoin that is 1:1 backed by USDC. This allows Polymarket to settle user funds within its own ecosystem, effectively enabling it to hold and potentially generate revenue from the underlying USDC reserves.

QHow does the introduction of Polymarket USD change the platform's business model beyond transaction fees?

ABeyond transaction fees, Polymarket USD enables Polymarket to generate revenue from the idle USDC reserves backing the stablecoin. By investing these reserves in low-risk assets like U.S. Treasury bonds or Circle's institutional accounts, Polymarket could earn significant interest income, estimated at tens of millions of dollars annually.

QWhat are the potential benefits for users in the transition to Polymarket USD, according to the article?

AFor most users, the transition to Polymarket USD is seamless and requires only a single confirmation on the front end. The change also opens the possibility for Polymarket to improve capital efficiency for users by leveraging idle funds for yield-generating activities, potentially offering returns that act as a hedge.

QHow does the article describe the strategic shift in Polymarket's role within the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe article describes the shift as Polymarket evolving from a prediction market platform that relies on external stablecoins to one that controls the issuance and distribution of its own stablecoin. This grants Polymarket greater negotiating power with partners like Circle and positions it as a key distributor of USDC, similar to Coinbase.

QWhat regulatory consideration is mentioned regarding Polymarket's ability to generate yield from stablecoin reserves?

AThe article mentions the U.S. CLARITY Act, which initially proposed banning crypto companies from offering interest on stablecoin holdings. However, recent reports suggest that disagreements between crypto and banking sectors are nearing resolution, with expectations leaning towards allowing such practices, which would enable Polymarket to pursue yield generation.

Related Reads

The $290 Million Deficit: A Three-Way Game Between Aave, L0, and Kelp—Who Should Foot the Bill?

An incident involving the theft of 116,500 rsETH (worth approximately $290 million) from Kelp DAO’s cross-chain bridge contract has triggered a complex dispute over responsibility and compensation among Kelp DAO, LayerZero, and Aave. The attack occurred due to a compromised RPC provider used by LayerZero’s Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN). Since Kelp DAO’s bridge used a 1/1 DVN configuration—a single point of failure—the attacker successfully forged a cross-chain message, leading to the unauthorized release of rsETH tokens from the mainnet. These genuine tokens were then deposited into Aave and other lending platforms to borrow WETH, enabling the attacker to exit with the funds. Responsibility is attributed primarily to Kelp DAO for its risky 1/1 DVN setup. LayerZero bears secondary responsibility for permitting such a vulnerable configuration in its protocol layer. Aave also shares indirect blame for over-collateralizing rsETH and other Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) assets without adequate ongoing risk oversight. Kelp DAO lacks sufficient funds to cover the loss, shifting focus to the deeper-pocketed players: LayerZero, whose cross-chain ecosystem and reputation are at risk, and Aave, which faces massive bad loans and declining Total Value Locked (TVL). Aave has asserted that mainnet rsETH remains fully backed, implying it expects Kelp DAO to allow redemption of underlying ETH. This approach would preserve Aave’s mainnet positions but invalidate Layer2 rsETH, damaging LayerZero’s cross-chain credibility. Potential solutions include: - A universal 18.5% haircut on all rsETH holders, causing significant Aave bad debt. - Writing off Layer2 rsETH entirely, protecting Aave mainnet but harming LayerZero and Kelp DAO. - Negotiating a bounty with the hacker for partial fund return. - A joint bailout, possibly led by LayerZero’s ecosystem fund, given its long-term stake in the cross-chain ecosystem. The situation remains unresolved as the parties negotiate, but prolonged delay risks broader DeFi instability, including potential liquidity crises and loss of confidence in LRT and cross-chain infrastructures.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

The $290 Million Deficit: A Three-Way Game Between Aave, L0, and Kelp—Who Should Foot the Bill?

Odaily星球日报11m ago

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Exclusive Analysis

This market analysis covers Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, highlighting key levels and trading strategies for the week. HYPE is currently testing a critical support level at $40.17. A hold above this level could lead to consolidation between $40.17–$45.76, while a break below it may signal the end of its current V-wave uptrend from the April 2 low. The short-term strategy is to look for long entries near $40.17 if support holds, using 30% leverage and strict stop-loss discipline. Bitcoin is interpreted to be in a larger D-wave rebound from the February 6 low of $60,000, currently trading within a $73,500–$79,000 range. Key resistance lies at $79,000–$80,600 and $83,500–$84,500, with supports at $73,500, $69,500, and $65,000–$66,000. The medium-term strategy maintains a 60% short position from $89,000. Short-term tactics include selling into rallies near $76,500–$79,000 (Scenario A) or breaking below $73,500 (Scenario B), using 30% leverage. Last week, a 1x leveraged long trade in HYPE yielded a 6.80% gain, and the BTC short from $89,000 is currently up approximately 17.08%. Risk management is emphasized: set stop-losses at entry, move to breakeven at +1% profit, and trail stops to lock in gains thereafter. All views are based on technical analysis and are not investment advice. Traders are urged to exercise caution and adapt to market changes.

marsbit42m ago

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Exclusive Analysis

marsbit42m ago

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

The market is experiencing directional uncertainty with both opportunities and risks. HYPE's daily V-wave structure is at a critical juncture, with the $40.17 support level being pivotal for its future trajectory. A break below this level, followed by an inability to surpass the recent high of $45.76, could signal the end of the current upward structure. The short-term strategy for HYPE is to "follow the trend and buy on dips," using a 30% position size and a 30/60-minute trading cycle, entering long upon confirmed support holds with model signals. Bitcoin's market structure is reinterpreted, with the rally from the $60,000 low now considered a larger D-wave rebound within a medium-term correction, facing a key test between $73,500 and $79,000. A break above the upper bound may lead to limited upside, while a drop below could see a decline toward $69,500. Core resistance lies at $79,000–$80,600 and $83,500–$84,500, with support at $73,500, $69,500, and $65,000–$66,000. The medium-term strategy maintains a 60% short position from $89,000, to be exited if price stabilizes above the multi-empty band. Short-term tactics involve 30% positions for "spread" opportunities, with two scenarios: selling on rallies near $76,500–$79,000 (Scheme A) or shorting on a breakdown below $73,500 (Scheme B), both with strict stop-losses. A复盘 of HYPE's recent short trade showed a 6.80% gain from a long entry at $41.59 (based on model buy signals) and exit at $44.42 (triggered by top signals). Key reminders include setting initial stops at entry, moving to breakeven at +1% profit, and trailing stops thereafter. All views are for reference only; market conditions change rapidly, and caution is advised.

Odaily星球日报49m ago

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报49m ago

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

Bitcoin's recent price movement is being heavily influenced by Michael Saylor and his company, MicroStrategy, through a new financial instrument: STRC (Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock). This Nasdaq-listed perpetual preferred stock offers an 11.5% annual dividend, attracting significant capital. Crucially, funds raised from STRC are used to purchase Bitcoin, with a 3x leverage effect—for every $1 from STRC, MicroStrategy adds $2 from MSTR equity to buy $3 worth of BTC. This creates a powerful "flywheel": more STRC sales fuel massive BTC buying, supporting its price and improving MicroStrategy's credit, which in turn makes STRC more attractive to investors. However, this mechanism introduces risks. A significant "ex-dividend arbitrage" pattern has emerged, where traders buy STRC before its monthly dividend, collect the payout, and quickly sell, causing price volatility and potentially driving up Bitcoin's cost basis for MicroStrategy. In response, Saylor has proposed shifting STRC to a semi-monthly dividend to smooth out these effects. Furthermore, STRC's high yield is being integrated into DeFi protocols like Apyx Protocol and Saturn Credit, offering new on-chain yield opportunities. The central concern remains: as MicroStrategy aggressively accumulates over 3.5% of all BTC, it challenges Bitcoin's foundational principle of decentralization, creating a system where a single public company significantly influences the market.

marsbit57m ago

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalized services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalization of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualization of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasizes these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalized Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

953 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.05Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

How to Buy BANK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)After purchasing your Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Easily trade Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.9k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.09Updated 2025.05.09

How to Buy BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片