Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-23Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

Source:Shanghai Securities News

Fueled by intense market capital interest in memory chips, as of June 22, the South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF has seen its year-to-date gains break through tenfold. Concurrently, the ETF's asset scale has skyrocketed by over twenty times compared to the end of last year.

However, industry insiders caution that against the backdrop of semiconductor sector valuations being at historical highs and growing divergence between bullish and bearish sentiments, the risks of leveraged products magnifying losses in both directions are accelerating. Retail investors need to maintain a sufficiently prudent attitude towards such instruments.

South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF Surges Over Tenfold Year-to-Date

Since 2026, the global semiconductor rally has continued its furious pace. In the A-share market, core storage stocks like GigaDevice, Deming Li, and Jiangbolong have persistently climbed; overseas market fervor remains unabated, with South Korean memory giant SK Hynix's stock price continuing its ascent. On June 22, SK Hynix briefly surpassed Samsung Electronics in market capitalization during trading hours, touching the top spot in the South Korean stock market. Its closing price rose 5.61% on the day.

Previously, SK Hynix announced it had delivered samples of its 12-layer HBM4E to key customers. This product is a new-generation high-performance DRAM designed for AI scenarios.

According to industry observers, compared to HBM4, HBM4E achieves dual upgrades in performance and energy efficiency, with a maximum pin speed reaching 16 Gbps and energy efficiency improving by over 20%. Leveraging a new interface and architecture design, it can reduce transmission latency and maintain stable operation under high-bandwidth conditions, thereby enhancing both the data processing capabilities for AI training and inference and the overall computational efficiency of next-generation AI data centers and large-scale computing systems.

Zhou Jingxiang, Fund Manager of Noah Research Select Fund, told the Shanghai Securities News reporter that the core driver of this memory upcycle stems from the explosive demand for SSD storage driven by AI inference computing power, and industry prosperity may trend upward throughout the year.

Leveraged ETFs linked to core chip leaders like SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics have also experienced epic-level market performance.

As of the close on June 22, the South China Double Long SK Hynix ETF listed in the Hong Kong market surged 16.55% in a single day, with year-to-date cumulative gains reaching a staggering 1061.92%. The product officially debuted on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on October 16, 2025, with an initial size of approximately HK$24 million. However, as the storage rally intensified, the product's scale experienced explosive growth – reaching $14.418 billion as of June 18, a meteoric rise of 21.7 times from $636 million at the end of last year.

The South China Double Long Samsung Electronics ETF has also seen substantial capital inflows. Data shows that as of June 18, its size reached $4.4 billion. Following a 215.96% surge in scale in May, its size has grown by over 50% again since June.

However, dissecting the capital structure reveals that the leveraged ETF trading market currently exhibits a highly distinct feature of retail investor dominance, with institutional capital largely absent.

"The vast majority of institutions do not allocate to leveraged ETFs; only a small number of hedge funds use them as tools for short-term swing trading," a senior foreign fund manager candidly told this newspaper. Long-term allocation funds like pensions seek stable, long-term returns, which are completely mismatched with the high-volatility, high-risk return profile of leveraged products. Individual investors constitute the core purchasing group for such products.

Beware of Potential Volatility Risks

From an industry perspective, leveraged ETFs are typical "double-edged swords" that amplify both returns and risks. They can multiply investment returns during upward market phases; however, when the market turns downward, the magnitude of losses is similarly magnified. With growing divergence in global semiconductor sector outlooks and multiple uncertainties intertwining across geopolitics, industry dynamics, and valuations, the hidden risks within leveraged ETFs are continuously being exposed. Investors need to remain highly vigilant.

Recent severe market volatility has vividly demonstrated the destructive power of leveraged product losses. The South Korean Financial Supervisory Service's monitoring report released on June 18 showed that during the period from May 27 to June 12, while the underlying Samsung Electronics stock experienced a maximum drawdown of 18.0%, the corresponding two-times leveraged long ETF suffered a maximum drawdown of 35.9%, with losses nearly doubling. The SK Hynix stock drawdown was 19.1%, but its two-times leveraged ETF drawdown expanded further to 38%. Regulatory authorities have repeatedly warned that with South Korean individual stocks having a daily price limit of ±30%, two-times leveraged products theoretically face maximum single-day losses of up to 60%. Under extreme market conditions, principal capital can be severely depleted.

Beyond the routine amplification of volatility risk, leveraged ETFs have also experienced extreme abnormal scenarios where their price action completely diverges from the underlying stock, inflicting massive losses on retail investors chasing highs in the short term. In early June this year, a two-times leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibited divergent performance for two consecutive trading days: On June 8, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell nearly 8%, the ETF surged nearly 50% against the trend; the next day, when the underlying stock rose sharply over 13%, the ETF plummeted by 40% intraday.

Addressing this abnormal volatility, the product issuer, Korea Investment Management, explained that the root cause was insufficient market maker liquidity. During the closing auction period, market makers are not obligated to provide mandatory quotes. A large volume of market buy orders pushed the fund price higher, creating a significant premium. When market liquidity recovered the following day, prices rapidly converged to fair value, causing substantial drawdowns for investors who entered at the previous day's elevated prices.

A fund analyst in Shanghai systematically dissected multiple potential risks of leveraged ETFs, both long-term and short-term: Firstly, due to the derivative structure employing daily leverage resetting, high market volatility environments can lead to time decay. Even if the underlying stock price returns to its previous high, the fund's net asset value may still suffer permanent losses. Secondly, leverage amplifies both gains and losses. With the overall semiconductor sector valuation currently at historical highs, any collective pullback would trigger drawdown impacts far exceeding those of the underlying stocks. If concentrated redemptions occur after sustained product scale inflation, it could also trigger a liquidity spiral, further exacerbating price declines. Thirdly, the trading volume of leveraged products in the South Korean market is nearing that of leading chip stocks themselves. Massive retail capital concentrated in one-sided bets creates a positive feedback loop, continuously boosting buying pressure during rallies, while batch stop-loss selling accelerates declines during downturns, significantly elevating market fragility.

Uncertainties at the industry chain fundamental level can also amplify the volatility risks of leveraged products. Sheng Jin, Portfolio Director at Value Partners, told this newspaper reporter that the semiconductor industry chain is long and deeply intertwined with globalized specialization. The variables affecting valuations are complex and intertwined. Any single variable, such as a company's quarterly earnings falling short of expectations or adjustments in global industrial policies, can quickly disrupt existing valuation logic, triggering violent sector fluctuations, which high-leverage products will synchronously magnify in impact.

Related Questions

QWhat is the year-to-date return of the Leverage Product linked to SK Hynix mentioned in the article as of June 22nd?

AThe article states that the year-to-date return of the Southern Leverage Product (ETF) that provides two times the daily return of SK Hynix has exceeded 1000%, specifically reaching 1061.92%.

QWhat are the main risks associated with leveraged ETFs like the one tracking SK Hynix, as highlighted in the article?

AThe article highlights several key risks: 1) Magnified losses during market downturns, as losses are amplified just like gains. 2) The potential for permanent value erosion due to 'volatility decay' inherent in the daily resetting leverage structure. 3) Liquidity risks, where a lack of market makers can lead to extreme price dislocations from the underlying asset, causing severe losses for investors. 4) Increased market fragility due to a high concentration of retail investors engaging in one-sided bets, which can amplify price swings.

QAccording to the article, what is the core driver of the current upcycle in the memory chip sector?

AAccording to Zhou Jingxiang, a fund manager cited in the article, the core driver of the current memory upcycle is the explosive demand for SSD storage brought about by AI inference computing power.

QWhat specific product advancement from SK Hynix is mentioned as contributing to its market performance?

AThe article mentions that SK Hynix announced it had sent samples of its next-generation high-performance DRAM, the 12-layer HBM4E, to key customers. This product is designed for AI scenarios and offers upgrades in both performance and energy efficiency compared to HBM4.

QWhat unusual price behavior did a leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibit in early June, and what was the cited reason?

AIn early June, a two-times leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix exhibited a price dislocation from the underlying stock. On June 8th, the stock fell nearly 8%, but the ETF surged nearly 50%. The next day, the stock rose over 13%, but the ETF plunged 40% intraday. The product manager, Korea Investment Management Company, attributed this abnormal volatility to insufficient market maker liquidity during the closing auction period, which led to a large premium. When liquidity normalized, the price sharply corrected to its fair value.

Related Reads

Coin Stock Barometer丨BitMine's Total Assets and Investment Reach $10.7 Billion, Exceeding ~$9.3 Billion Floating Loss; Strategy Buys Only 520 BTC, Strive Adds Positions Against the Trend (June 23)

This article provides a weekly market update on "coin-equity" trends, focusing on listed companies holding major cryptocurrencies. Key highlights include: **General Market Trends:** Global equities, particularly in the US, Japan, and South Korea, faced significant sell-offs, led by large tech and AI-related stocks. Analysts cite profit-taking and a shift from hype-driven to performance-driven valuation for AI companies. Market focus is on upcoming Micron Technology's earnings. **Cryptocurrency Treasury Updates:** * **Bitcoin (BTC):** Net weekly BTC purchases by listed companies (excluding miners) totaled approximately $86 million, down 13.97% from the prior week. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) purchased only 520 BTC for ~$34.9 million, while Strive Asset Management increased its holdings by 759 BTC for ~$50 million. Other notable actions include Mara Holdings adding 1,000 BTC and Capital B shareholders approving a massive financing plan (up to ~$1.2 trillion) to potentially expand its Bitcoin reserves. * **Ethereum (ETH):** BitMine emerged as the largest corporate ETH treasury, holding 5.67 million ETH (4.7% of supply). It purchased an additional 52,203 ETH ($92 million) in the past week. Sharplink completed a $75 million private placement to fund further ETH accumulation and stock buybacks. * **Solana (SOL):** The top five listed companies hold over 15.7 million SOL combined. However, Solmate Infrastructure, a SOL treasury firm, faces a lawsuit from its largest external shareholder alleging board misconduct and self-dealing. * **Other:** Updates include Canton Strategic's $50 million stock buyback plan and Lite Strategy's $1 million strategic investment in LitVM, a Layer-2 network for Litecoin. The article notes that while crypto treasury firms continue fundraising and accumulation, their stocks may struggle to rise against the broader market downturn until Q4.

marsbit3m ago

Coin Stock Barometer丨BitMine's Total Assets and Investment Reach $10.7 Billion, Exceeding ~$9.3 Billion Floating Loss; Strategy Buys Only 520 BTC, Strive Adds Positions Against the Trend (June 23)

marsbit3m ago

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

The hottest new role in Silicon Valley is the Forward Deployment Engineer (FDE), a hybrid of engineer and business consultant whose core mission is to transform AI demos into native, practical workflows within client organizations. The recent surge in demand is driven by a strategic shift from leading AI companies. OpenAI, partnering with 19 private equity firms in a $4 billion investment, formed a Deployment Company and acquired Tomoro along with its 150 FDEs. Anthropic also announced a $1.5 billion joint venture with financial institutions like Blackstone. The article, based on interviews with industry experts Jove (FDE lead at Cresta) and Oliver (VP at Invisible Technologies, ex-McKinsey), explores the FDE role and the rise of deployment-focused companies. Key insights include: **The FDE Role:** Jove describes an FDE as a "Forward Deployed CTO"—a technically strong engineer who works intimately with clients to implement AI solutions, learn from the process, and feed those insights back to improve the core product. They require expertise in AI agents, client-facing experience, resilience, and the ability to handle complex, imperfect systems. While AI tools enhance their efficiency, the role's complexity makes full automation a distant prospect. **Industry Shift:** Model companies are moving beyond selling tools to ensuring real-world adoption. This blurs the line between model and application companies. Collaborations with private equity (PE) firms are key, providing access to large portfolios of traditional businesses needing AI transformation. For PE firms, these partnerships offer signal value to LPs, create tangible value in portfolio companies, and provide exposure to high-growth AI assets. **Consulting & Transformation:** AI deployment involves deep, customized workflow redesign, moving beyond simple tool augmentation. Companies like Invisible Technologies build modular platforms to create bespoke, AI-native workflows for clients. While traditional consulting will see growth in helping businesses rethink their models for AI, the real value is captured by firms that leave behind transformed, operational systems. Critical success factors include building robust data foundations and strategically deciding which workflow steps should be deterministic versus AI-driven. The ultimate goal shifts from pure cost-cutting to unlocking new revenue opportunities previously impossible without AI-scale capabilities.

marsbit15m ago

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

marsbit15m ago

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

The article explores the core reasons why DeFi insurance remains largely unutilized despite its potential to eliminate traditional insurance inefficiencies and malicious claim denials through automated smart contracts. Key points include: 1. **Low Adoption & Minimal Payouts:** Leading provider Nexus Mutual has paid only ~$18M in claims since 2019, dwarfed by single hack losses (e.g., Kelp DAO's $292M loss). 2. **High Correlation Risk:** Unlike traditional insurance (e.g., house fires), DeFi risks (oracle failures, bridge hacks) are systemic and can simultaneously impact multiple protocols, threatening to drain entire insurance pools. 3. **Prohibitive Cost vs. Reward:** For many protocols (Aave, Morpho, Compound), insurance premiums (1.5%-6%) consume a significant portion or even all of the native yield (3%-4%), leaving investors with meager returns. In some cases (Maple Finance, Ethena), premiums can even result in net-negative yields. 4. **Inadequate Capacity:** The total DeFi insurance pool (e.g., Nexus Mutual's $81.56M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive supply-demand gap. 5. **Structural Flaws:** The claims assessment model (e.g., Nexus Mutual's member voting) creates a conflict of interest, as voters bear the loss if a claim is paid. There is also no regulatory mandate forcing DeFi protocols to obtain insurance. The industry is adapting by focusing on preventative measures (e.g., bug bounty coverage) and seeking external capital via reinsurance. However, the fundamental issues of small pool size, correlated risk, and misaligned economic incentives persist. The article concludes that DeFi insurance, like a public lighthouse, provides shared security benefits, but if everyone relies on others to pay for it, no one will, leaving the ecosystem vulnerable.

Foresight News30m ago

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

Foresight News30m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片