Donald Trump's Company Sold Another Large Batch of Bitcoins!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-02Last updated on 2026-08-02

Abstract

Donald Trump's company, Trump Media & Technology Group, reportedly transferred another large batch of Bitcoin to the CryptoCom exchange. Blockchain analysis indicates that addresses linked to Trump Media moved approximately 2,628 BTC (worth around $165 million) to the exchange. Prior reports suggested the company had acquired a total of 11,542 BTC at an average price of $118,500. It is claimed that by 2026, about 7,281 BTC had been withdrawn from these addresses, with approximately 4,261 BTC still held on them. The total realized and unrealized losses from Trump Media's Bitcoin investments are estimated to be roughly $555 million. It is important to note that sending Bitcoin to an exchange does not definitively mean the assets were sold. Such transfers could also be for custody, liquidity management, or other financial operations. However, movements from cold wallets to centralized exchanges are commonly viewed as potential sales activity.

Reports indicate a new transfer of bitcoins from addresses allegedly associated with the media company of US President Donald Trump, Trump Media & Technology Group, to the cryptocurrency exchange CryptoCom.

According to blockchain analysis data, addresses linked to Trump Media transferred approximately 2628 $BTC to CryptoCom, amounting to about $165 million.

It was previously believed that the company purchased a total of 11,542 $BTC at an average price of $118,500. It is claimed that approximately 7,281 $BTC were withdrawn from these addresses in 2026, while around 4,261 $BTC are still stored on these addresses.

The total realized and unrealized losses of Trump Media from bitcoin investments are estimated at approximately $555 million.

However, sending bitcoins to a cryptocurrency exchange does not necessarily mean the assets were sold. The transfer could also have been made for storage, liquidity management, or another financial operation. This cannot currently be determined, and transfers from cold wallets to centralized exchanges are usually considered sales operations.

*This is not investment advice.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the article's headline about?

AThe article's headline is about Donald Trump's company reportedly selling another large batch of bitcoins.

QHow many bitcoins were reportedly transferred from addresses linked to Trump Media to CryptoCom, and what is its approximate dollar value?

AAccording to the article, addresses linked to Trump Media transferred approximately 2,628 BTC, valued at about $165 million, to the CryptoCom exchange.

QWhat were the total realized and unrealized losses estimated for Trump Media from its bitcoin investments?

AThe article states that the total realized and unrealized losses for Trump Media from its bitcoin investments are estimated to be approximately $555 million.

QWhat possible reasons does the article give for transferring bitcoins to a cryptocurrency exchange, other than selling them?

AThe article suggests that besides selling, a transfer to a crypto exchange could be for custody, liquidity management, or another financial operation.

QWhat disclaimer is provided at the end of the article?

AThe article ends with the disclaimer: "*This is not investment advice."

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片