90% of Rare Earth Refining is in China's Hands, American Humanoid Robot Mass Production Faces a Hardware Bottleneck

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-16Last updated on 2026-03-16

Abstract

The article highlights a critical vulnerability in the U.S. ambition to mass-produce humanoid robots like Optimus: China’s dominance over the hardware supply chain, particularly rare earth elements (REEs). China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85–90% of refining capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet production—key components in actuators, motors, and sensors essential for robotic joints and drivetrains. Major U.S. robotics firms rely heavily on Chinese and Japanese suppliers for critical components such as harmonic reducers, servo systems, and precision gears, while retaining only the AI "brain" domestically. In a scenario with 1 billion humanoid robots by 2050, Morgan Stanley estimates massive demand for neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium—consuming significant portions of global reserves. The author urges the U.S. to invest in rebuilding its rare earth supply chain—from mining and refining to magnet production—and lists key firms involved in magnet metals, structural metallurgy, and semiconductors. Without secure, cost-competitive access to these materials, U.S. robotics growth faces a structural risk, with China holding a potential "shut-off switch" over hardware production.

Author: Serenity

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: All the discussions about the robot revolution focus on AI and software, but this tweet points out a more fundamental structural risk: China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85-90% of refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet manufacturing. The joints and actuators of humanoid robots like Optimus all rely on Chinese or Japanese suppliers; what the US retains is just the "brain." The author uses specific material lists and Morgan Stanley's demand forecasts to quantify this bottleneck, projecting its impact on rare earth reserves in the era of 1 billion humanoid robots.

Full Text Below:

The United States is losing the robot and humanoid robot race with China.

Software and AI are only half the battle.

China holds a kill switch over the US robotics hardware supply chain because: The US cannot manufacture the materials needed for humanoid robots at scale and at a reasonable cost.

If China presses this "kill switch," the entire US robotics build-out will slow down—because China has dominant control over the "body" (actuators, reducers, metallurgy) and the raw materials required to manufacture humanoid robots.

Consequently, US robotics companies have signed contracts with Chinese manufacturers to procure all humanoid robot components, in order to assemble products like Optimus at a low enough cost. However, they are trying to keep the "brain" in the US.

Look at all the top robotic transmission/motion suppliers; none are from the US:

  • Leaderdrive (China): Harmonic reducers
  • Harmonic Drive (Japan): Harmonic reducers
  • Nabtesco (Japan): RV reducers
  • Sanhua Intelligent (China): Linear actuator assemblies
  • Zhejiang Shuanghuan Transmission (China): RV reducers/gears
  • Shenzhen Inovance Technology (China): Servo systems/ball screws

There is a core reason behind this:

China currently controls nearly 70% of global rare earth mining, and more critically, holds 85% to 90% of global refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of finished rare earth magnet manufacturing.

Therefore, the biggest threat is: Chinese export controls pose a structural risk hanging over US robotics projects.

Beijing has already demonstrated a willingness to weaponize this monopoly, as Japan did in a similar situation.

To break the dependence on the robotics and Optimus supply chain and ensure the robot revolution can proceed domestically, Western capital needs to flow to companies rebuilding the rare earth ecosystem, covering:

  • Upstream mining
  • Midstream separation/metallization
  • Downstream magnet manufacturing

If the global number of humanoid robots reaches 1 billion by 2050—a baseline scenario in Morgan Stanley's model—it would require approximately 400,000 tons of neodymium, 80,000 tons of dysprosium, and 16,000 tons of terbium. This would consume about 15% of the world's known neodymium reserves, 25% of dysprosium reserves, and 30% of terbium reserves, constituting a demand shock.

In short: China has control over the US robotics hardware supply chain.

Now is the historical moment when the US must invest in securing its own supply chain to ensure victory in the robotics race with China.

The key lies in rare earths, a prerequisite for producing robotic humanoid hardware at competitive prices.

Here are the areas the US government needs to focus on:

1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors)

Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr): These "light rare earths" are the core components of NdFeB magnets

Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb): Rare earth elements alloyed into magnets

Samarium (Sm) and Cobalt (Co): Used to make SmCo magnets

Boron (B) and Iron (Fe): Key stabilizing minerals, accounting for about 1% of the weight of NdFeB magnets

2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic reducers and planetary roller screws)

Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), and Molybdenum (Mo): Gears in harmonic reducers and threaded shafts in planetary roller screws

Niobium (Nb), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), and Manganese (Mn): Critical microalloying elements added to structural steel to improve toughness, prevent corrosion, and significantly reduce robot joint weight

Cerium (Ce) and Lanthanum (La): Prevent premature failure of robot gears

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Brain, Eyes, and Battery)

Gallium (Ga) and Germanium (Ge): Indispensable for advanced semiconductors, LiDAR systems, and high-frequency communication chips

Lithium (Li), Graphite (C), and Copper (Cu): A single full-size humanoid robot requires approximately 2 kg of lithium, 3 kg of graphite, and up to 6.5 kg of copper

Key Company List

The most important US companies to secure the above capabilities are:

1. Magnet Metals (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU, $MP, $ALOY, $USAR, $LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths), $NEO (TSX), $ILU, $ARU (ASX)

2. Structural Metallurgy (Nb, V, Ti, Be):

$ATI, $CRS, $FCX, $NB, $MTRN, $LGO

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Ga, Ge, Graphite, Battery Metals):

$BMM, $VNP, $TECK, $ALB, $EAF, $ALTM, $SYR, $FCX, $AW1 (ASX)

Taking a robot joint as an example, it is a permanent magnet motor requiring a neodymium processing supply chain:

1. Neo Performance Materials (TSX: NEO)

2. $MP

3. $UUUU—Processes monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide

The US government should meticulously review the Bill of Materials (BOM) for each robotics supply chain and then invest heavily to ensure processing capacity for raw materials.

Currently, the transmission systems needed to manufacture humanoid robots, as well as the global infrastructure to produce these components, are highly concentrated in China.

The US is highly vulnerable in the physical robotics supply chain. Securing domestic metal and midstream processing capabilities is crucial for competing with China.

The US must invest heavily in critical material supply chains today to maintain long-term dominance in the robotics industry.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global rare earth refining and separation capacity does China control?

AChina controls 85% to 90% of the global rare earth refining and separation capacity.

QWhat is the core structural risk for the U.S. humanoid robot industry mentioned in the text?

AThe core structural risk is that China holds a 'shutdown key' over the U.S. robotics hardware supply chain, as it dominates the production of actuators, reducers, metallurgy, and the raw materials required.

QWhich two Chinese companies are listed as suppliers of harmonic and RV reducers for humanoid robots?

ALeaderdrive (harmonic reducer) and Double Ring Transmission (RV reducer/gears) are the Chinese companies mentioned.

QWhat massive demand shock for rare earths is predicted if 1 billion humanoid robots are built by 2050?

AIt would require approximately 400,000 tons of Neodymium (consuming 15% of global reserves), 80,000 tons of Dysprosium (25% of reserves), and 16,000 tons of Terbium (30% of reserves).

QWhat are the three key areas the U.S. government should focus on to secure its supply chain for robotics, as outlined in the article?

AThe three key areas are: 1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors), 2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic drives and planetary roller screws), and 3. Computing, Perception & Power (for the brain, eyes, and battery).

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit21m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit21m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit28m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit28m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit37m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit37m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit40m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit40m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit42m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片