¡La compañía de Donald Trump vendió otro lote importante de bitcoins!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-02Last updated on 2026-08-02

Abstract

Se reporta una nueva transferencia de bitcoins desde direcciones presuntamente vinculadas a la compañía mediática del expresidente estadounidense Donald Trump, Trump Media & Technology Group, a la bolsa de criptomonedas CryptoCom. Según datos de la cadena de bloques, las direcciones asociadas con Trump Media transfirieron aproximadamente 2,628 BTC (unos 165 millones de dólares) a CryptoCom. Anteriormente se creía que la empresa había comprado un total de 11,542 BTC a un precio promedio de $118,500. Se afirma que en 2026 se retiraron de estas direcciones alrededor de 7,281 BTC, y que aproximadamente 4,261 BTC permanecen almacenados en ellas. Se estima que las pérdidas totales, realizadas y no realizadas, de Trump Media por sus inversiones en bitcoin ascienden a unos 555 millones de dólares. Cabe señalar que el envío de criptomonedas a una bolsa no significa necesariamente una venta; podría ser para custodia, gestión de liquidez u otra operación. Sin embargo, estas transferencias desde carteras frías suelen interpretarse como preparativos para la venta.

Se ha informado de una nueva transferencia de bitcoins desde direcciones presumiblemente vinculadas a la compañía mediática del expresidente de EE.UU. Donald Trump, Trump Media & Technology Group, al intercambio de criptomonedas CryptoCom.

Según datos de análisis de la cadena de bloques, las direcciones asociadas con Trump Media transfirieron aproximadamente 2,628 $BTC a CryptoCom, lo que equivale a unos 165 millones de dólares.

Anteriormente se suponía que la compañía había adquirido un total de 11,542 $BTC a un precio promedio de 118,500 dólares. Se afirma que en 2026, aproximadamente 7,281 $BTC fueron retirados de estas direcciones, mientras que alrededor de 4,261 $BTC aún permanecen en estas direcciones.

Las pérdidas totales realizadas y no realizadas de la compañía Trump Media por sus inversiones en bitcoins se estiman en aproximadamente 555 millones de dólares.

Sin embargo, el envío de bitcoins a un intercambio de criptomonedas no necesariamente significa que los activos hayan sido vendidos. La transferencia también podría haberse realizado para custodia, gestión de liquidez u otra operación financiera. Actualmente esto no se puede determinar, y las transferencias desde carteras frías a intercambios centralizados generalmente se consideran operaciones de venta.

*Esto no es una recomendación de inversión.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q¿De qué trata la noticia sobre Donald Trump mencionada en el artículo?

ALa noticia trata sobre la venta de una gran cantidad de bitcoins por parte de la empresa del expresidente de EE.UU. Donald Trump, Trump Media & Technology Group, supuestamente enviando aproximadamente 2,628 BTC a la plataforma de intercambio CryptoCom.

Q¿Cuál es el valor aproximado en dólares de los 2,628 bitcoins transferidos según el artículo?

AEl valor aproximado de los 2,628 bitcoins transferidos es de unos 165 millones de dólares.

QSegún el análisis de blockchain, ¿cuántos bitcoins se afirma que adquirió originalmente Trump Media y a qué precio promedio?

ASegún el análisis de blockchain, se afirma que Trump Media adquirió originalmente un total de 11,542 bitcoins a un precio promedio de 118,500 dólares por bitcoin.

Q¿Cuál es la estimación de las pérdidas totales (realizadas y no realizadas) de Trump Media por sus inversiones en bitcoin?

ASe estima que las pérdidas totales (realizadas y no realizadas) de Trump Media por sus inversiones en bitcoin ascienden a aproximadamente 555 millones de dólares.

Q¿Por qué el artículo señala que enviar bitcoins a un exchange no necesariamente significa una venta?

AEl artículo señala que enviar bitcoins a un exchange de criptomonedas no necesariamente significa una venta, ya que la transferencia también podría ser para custodia, gestión de liquidez u otra operación financiera, aunque normalmente estos movimientos se consideran preparativos para una venta.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit41m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit41m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit41m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit41m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit51m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片