El estrés de los mineros de Bitcoin vuelve a mínimos históricos: ¿Se acerca una recuperación del BTC?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-06Last updated on 2026-07-06

Abstract

El estrés de los mineros de Bitcoin ha vuelto a mínimos históricos, situándose en niveles de capitulación similares a los observados en ciclos anteriores como 2015, 2018, 2020, 2022 y 2024. Este indicador, junto con la presión prolongada mostrada por las Hash Ribbons tras el halving y los ajustes a la baja de la dificultad de minería, apunta a que los beneficios mineros siguen deprimidos. Esta situación fuerza a los mineros más débiles a vender sus reservas para cubrir gastos operativos. El sentimiento del mercado se alinea con este agotamiento. El ratio de Sharpe de BTC cayó a -20, reflejando uno de los peores períodos de rendimiento ajustado al riesgo en este ciclo, impulsado por tres trimestres consecutivos de pérdidas. Sin embargo, caídas similares en este ratio en ciclos pasados marcaron el inicio de fases de acumulación prolongada. La narrativa general sugiere que, una vez que la capitulación minera se complete y los tenedores a largo plazo continúen absorbiendo la oferta, las presiones a la baja podrían comenzar a disiparse. Esto crearía un entorno favorable para una recuperación más sólida del mercado, transitando desde un posicionamiento defensivo hacia la construcción de una base más duradera.

El ecosistema de minería de Bitcoin [BTC] está experimentando actualmente el período más estresante de este ciclo. El Índice Compuesto de Estrés del Ciclo de los Mineros ha caído a su zona histórica de infravaloración, coincidiendo con las señales de capitulación observadas anteriormente en 2015, 2018, 2020, 2022 y 2024.

Fuente: X

El estrés en el ciclo de los mineros se alinea con la continua presión extendida sobre los mineros que muestra el indicador Hash Ribbon tras el halving. El nivel actual de dificultad de minería sigue por encima de los niveles normales. Esto se debe a los dos ajustes a la baja consecutivos realizados recientemente.

Fuente: Glassnode

Por lo tanto, los beneficios de la minería siguen deprimidos. Este cambio forzará a los actores más débiles a vender sus reservas para pagar sus gastos operativos. Sin embargo, los actores más fuertes seguirán asegurando la red de Bitcoin gracias a su eficiencia operativa. Con el tiempo, este proceso reducirá la necesidad de que los actores fuertes realicen ventas forzadas.

Una vez que la capitulación de los mineros parezca completa y los tenedores a largo plazo sigan absorbiendo la oferta, las presiones a la baja podrían empezar a desvanecerse, creando así un entorno favorable para una recuperación del mercado a mayor escala.

El sentimiento del mercado se alinea con el agotamiento de los mineros

A medida que la capitulación de los mineros comienza a aliviar la presión estructural de venta, el sentimiento de los inversores también está alcanzando niveles de pesimismo históricos. A pesar de ello, el ratio de Sharpe de Bitcoin estaba en -20 y desde entonces se ha recuperado. Esto muestra uno de los peores períodos de rentabilidad ajustada al riesgo dentro de este ciclo.

Fuente: CryptoQuant

El descenso anterior fue impulsado por tres trimestres negativos consecutivos, incluyendo una pérdida trimestral del 16.1%, lo que subraya la continua aversión al riesgo.

Cabe destacar que AMBCrypto informó previamente de que las salidas de los ETF de Bitcoin y el creciente estrés de los mineros aumentaban los riesgos de capitulación, a pesar de que las valoraciones se mantenían por encima de los mínimos históricos.

Sin embargo, como se vio en ciclos anteriores, 2015, 2018 y 2022, se experimentaron caídas comparables del Ratio de Sharpe. Sin embargo, estos fueron el comienzo de fases de acumulación prolongadas en las que los vendedores se habían quedado sin fuerzas.

Esta coincidencia refuerza la narrativa de capitulación más amplia que ya está surgiendo en los datos de los mineros. Si la volatilidad disminuye gradualmente mientras los tenedores a largo plazo siguen absorbiendo la oferta, Bitcoin podría pasar de un posicionamiento defensivo a la construcción de una base de mercado más sólida.


Resumen Final

  • El estrés de los mineros de Bitcoin ha alcanzado niveles históricamente raros, reforzando las señales más amplias de una capitulación tardía del ciclo.
  • Los extremos en el Ratio de Sharpe del BTC siguen reflejando el profundo pesimismo de los inversores observado cerca de los puntos de inflexión de ciclos anteriores.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q¿Qué indica el actual nivel del Índice Compuesto de Estrés del Ciclo de los Mineros de Bitcoin?

AIndica que el ecosistema de minería de Bitcoin está experimentando el período de mayor estrés de este ciclo, habiendo caído a su zona histórica de infravaloración, lo que coincide con señales de capitulación vistas anteriormente en 2015, 2018, 2020, 2022 y 2024.

Q¿Cómo afectan los ajustes a la baja de la dificultad de minería a los mineros?

AA pesar de dos ajustes consecutivos a la baja recientes, el nivel actual de dificultad de minería sigue siendo superior a lo normal. Esto mantiene los beneficios mineros deprimidos, forzando a los actores más débiles a vender sus reservas para cubrir gastos operativos.

Q¿Qué papel juegan los tenedores a largo plazo (holders) en la posible recuperación del mercado según el artículo?

AEl artículo sugiere que una vez que la capitulación de los mineros parezca completa y los tenedores a largo plazo continúen absorbiendo la oferta, las presiones a la baja podrían comenzar a desvanecerse, creando un entorno favorable para una recuperación del mercado a mayor escala.

Q¿Qué muestra el ratio de Sharpe de Bitcoin en su nivel actual según el análisis presentado?

AEl ratio de Sharpe de Bitcoin, que había caído a -20, refleja uno de los peores períodos de rendimiento ajustado al riesgo de este ciclo, mostrando un pesimismo extremo entre los inversores comparable a puntos de inflexión de ciclos anteriores.

QSegún el artículo, ¿qué similitudes existen entre la situación actual y ciclos de Bitcoin anteriores como 2015, 2018 y 2022?

AEl artículo destaca que en ciclos anteriores como 2015, 2018 y 2022 también se experimentaron caídas comparables en el ratio de Sharpe. Esos momentos marcaron el comienzo de fases de acumulación prolongadas, donde los vendedores ya habían agotado su impulso, fortaleciendo la narrativa de capitulación que también se observa en los datos actuales de los mineros.

Related Reads

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报7h ago

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报7h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbit8h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

637 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片