韩国探索加密货币账户冻结措施以防止市场操纵

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

韩国金融当局正探索引入加密货币账户预先冻结机制,以打击市场操纵行为。根据报道,金融服务委员会(FSC)自去年11月起讨论该措施,旨在防止嫌疑人通过预先买入、自动化重复交易、拉高抛售等典型操纵手段获取非法收益后转移或隐藏资产。 现行法律要求冻结资产需获得法院许可,无法快速阻止资产转移。FSC参考了今年4月《资本市场法》修订后针对股价操纵的支付暂停系统,该机制曾在去年9月首次冻结75个涉嫌操纵股价的账户。 官员指出,加密货币一旦转入个人钱包更易隐匿,当前仅能限制交易所存取款,而冻结金融机构提款可更快防止资产隐藏。此外,FSC与央行就稳定币发行规则存在分歧,导致《虚拟资产用户保护法》第二阶段推迟至2026年初提交,但核心政策已确定,包括运营商无过错赔偿责任和稳定币发行商破产隔离等投资者保护措施。

据报道,韩国金融当局正在考虑引入一种系统,允许监管机构先发制人地冻结加密货币账户,以阻止数字资产价格操纵。

FSC考虑加密货币账户冻结系统

周二,当地一家新闻媒体报道称,金融服务委员会(FSC)正在讨论引入一种系统,防止嫌疑人隐藏或提取与加密资产市场操纵相关的未实现利润。

在1月6日的一次会议上,监管机构透露,他们自11月以来一直在讨论此事,探讨针对加密资产价格操纵嫌疑人的起诉措施提案。

据Newsis报道,一些官员认为,“有必要通过实施没收犯罪所得或预先保存追回资金的措施,来补充当前的《虚拟资产用户保护法》。”

该措施将限制涉嫌通过典型市场操纵手段(包括预先购买、通过自动交易重复交易、高价买入和获利了结)获取非法收益的加密货币相关账户的资金流出,如提款、转账和支付。

根据现行规定,当局必须获得法院授权才能冻结与加密货币操纵相关的资产,这导致无法迅速采取行动并事先防止资产隐匿。据报道,一名委员会成员提到了针对股价操纵的支付暂停系统,该系统是通过4月份《资本市场法》的修订引入的。

该系统在去年9月出现了国内首例先发制人冻结涉嫌不公平交易账户的案例,当时股价操纵根除联合工作组对涉及一群富人的1万亿韩元股价操纵案的75个账户实施了这些措施。

据称,一些FSC官员强调,这个系统对于加密资产是必要的,他们认为加密资产一旦转移到个人钱包中就更容易被隐藏。一位官员指出:“目前,只有交易所的存款和取款被阻止,而向金融机构的取款仍然是可能的。阻止这些取款将有助于迅速防止隐匿。”

另一位FSC成员确认:“支付暂停是追回保全之前的一步;如果我们能主动实施,那将是有益的。”而其他人则询问《资本市场法》中与不公平交易相关的规定是否可以在《虚拟资产用户保护法》第二阶段中部分复制。

韩国虚拟资产推动的第二阶段

韩国《虚拟资产用户保护法》的第二阶段原定于2025年底提交。然而,由于FSC和韩国银行(BOK)之间持续存在分歧,该法案已推迟至2026年初。

据Bitcoinist报道,金融当局一直在就与稳定币发行和分配相关的规则发生冲突,对银行在发行与韩元挂钩的代币中的作用范围存在分歧。

中央银行推动由银行组成的财团拥有任何寻求在该国获得批准的稳定币发行人的至少51%的股份。FSC担心,给予银行多数股权可能会减少科技公司的参与并限制市场的创新。

尽管有所延迟,但据报道,加密货币框架的主要政策已经确定。值得注意的是,FSC的草案将包括投资者保护措施,例如加密资产运营商的无过错责任和稳定币发行人的破产风险隔离。

该法案预计将要求加密资产运营商遵守披露义务以及条款和条件。此外,“根据《电子金融交易法》,在发生黑客攻击或计算机系统故障的情况下,对数字资产运营商施加严格的损害赔偿责任。”

比特币(BTC)在一周图表中交易价格为92,552美元。来源:TradingView上的BTCUSDT

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q韩国金融当局考虑引入什么系统来防止加密货币市场操纵?

A韩国金融当局正在考虑引入一个允许监管机构预先冻结加密货币账户的系统,以防止数字资产价格操纵。

Q为什么现行规则下难以快速冻结涉嫌操纵市场的加密资产?

A根据现行规则,当局必须获得法院授权才能冻结与加密操纵相关的资产,这导致无法快速采取行动并事先防止资产隐匿。

Q韩国《虚拟资产用户保护法》第二阶段为何被延迟?

A由于韩国金融服务委员会(FSC)和韩国银行(BOK)在稳定币发行和分配规则上存在分歧,特别是关于银行在发行与韩元挂钩的代币中的角色,导致该法案从2025年底推迟到2026年初提交。

QFSC和韩国银行在稳定币发行上的主要分歧是什么?

A韩国银行主张任何稳定币发行机构必须由银行 consortium 持有至少51%的股份,而FSC担心这将减少科技公司的参与并限制市场创新。

QFSC的草案将包括哪些投资者保护措施?

AFSC的草案将包括加密资产运营商的无过错责任、稳定币发行商的破产风险隔离、加密资产披露义务以及根据《电子金融交易法》对黑客或系统故障造成的损害承担严格赔偿责任。

Related Reads

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

**Title:** Grayscale's Guide to Bottom-Fishing: Valuing Cryptoassets Using Cash Flows **Summary:** This report by Grayscale Research presents a fundamental valuation framework for cryptocurrency assets, moving beyond pure speculation to analyze those with underlying cash flows. It distinguishes between "commodity-like" assets (e.g., Bitcoin) and "cash-flow" assets, primarily within DeFi. Using the leading decentralized lending protocol Aave as a case study, the analysis applies traditional financial methodologies like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiples. Key findings indicate that AAVE tokens are currently undervalued. Despite recent challenges, the protocol's strong revenue growth, ~50% net profit margin, and diversified treasury support a fundamental valuation range of $80-$100 per token (compared to a ~$75 market price at the time of writing). In a base-case scenario driven by stablecoin adoption and regulatory clarity, the fair value could rise to around $175 within a year. The report emphasizes that protocol success does not automatically translate to token value. It critically examines the "value capture" mechanisms—such as buybacks, burns, and staking rewards—that channel protocol profits to token holders. Furthermore, it addresses the legal and governance complexities of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), noting their difference from traditional corporate equity but highlighting how robust, transparent governance can align protocol economics with holder interests. The conclusion is that the crypto market is maturing, with capital increasingly flowing towards projects with demonstrable fundamentals, real adoption, and disciplined capital allocation, creating opportunities for value-based investors.

marsbit59m ago

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

marsbit59m ago

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

After US-Iran talks led to a temporary ceasefire and framework for reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz, U.S. stocks rose on June 18, with the Nasdaq gaining 1.9%. The semiconductor and AI hardware sectors outperformed. This rally stemmed primarily from reduced geopolitical risk, which lowered oil prices and inflation expectations, easing discount rate pressure on high-valuation growth stocks like tech. The key question is not whether tech rebounded, but the nature of the rebound. The market appears to be selectively repricing AI infrastructure plays rather than broadly chasing AI narratives. Gains were concentrated in chips, optical interconnects, memory, and domestic manufacturing—segments tied to tangible data center build-outs and capital expenditure. Intel's ~10% surge, fueled by a Trump statement about potential Apple collaboration, exemplifies this mixed dynamic. It reflects policy catalysts and domestic manufacturing sentiment more than confirmed fundamentals. Meanwhile, strong earnings from companies like Astera Labs (revenue up 93% YoY) provided concrete evidence of AI-driven demand in hardware. In essence, the rally represents a risk-premium recalibration. Lower Middle East tensions opened a valuation repair window, and capital flowed first into AI infrastructure segments with visible near-term revenue streams. The sustainability of this move hinges on upcoming Q2 earnings, specifically continued strength in cloud provider capex, AI server orders, and hardware company guidance. Policy hopes alone are insufficient; the cycle needs validation from orders and financials.

marsbit1h ago

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

marsbit1h ago

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

While the AI community celebrates Noam Shazeer, co-author of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper, joining OpenAI as Head of Architectural Research, the company's audited financials reveal a starkly different reality. In 2025, OpenAI reported $13.07 billion in revenue but a massive $20.92 billion operating loss. Even excluding a one-time accounting charge, the cash burn is severe, with $3.7 billion consumed in Q1 2026 alone. This high-profile hiring occurs against a backdrop of significant internal research talent drain, with key founders and researchers departing as the company's focus shifts from exploratory research to product iteration. Meanwhile, OpenAI's fundamental business model faces a deep crisis. It paid Microsoft $10.59 billion for compute in 2025, while its vast user base of 9 billion weekly actives includes only 50 million paying customers, making growth a direct driver of escalating costs. The article argues Shazeer's recruitment is less about technical necessity and more about crafting a compelling narrative for OpenAI's upcoming IPO, aiming to justify a rumored $1 trillion valuation to future public market investors. It contrasts OpenAI's strategy with Anthropic's reported path to profitability, which relies on a strong enterprise customer base and cost control, rather than star-powered narratives. Ultimately, the piece concludes that while Shazeer's architectural work may take 1-2 years to materialize, OpenAI's financial clock is ticking much faster, with its massive losses undercutting the celebratory headlines.

marsbit2h ago

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片