Chainlink vs. Filecoin：哪种AI代币在2026年第一季度更具潜力？

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-03Last updated on 2026-01-03

Abstract

加密货币分析平台Santiment数据显示，Filecoin（FIL）在AI和大数据类代币中开发活跃度排名第一，Chainlink（LINK）和Internet Computer（ICP）分列二、三位。高开发活跃度通常意味着更高的用户采用率和代币需求增长潜力。 Chainlink大额钱包需求近期增加，储备钱包增持超9.4万枚LINK。Filecoin过去一周上涨19.5%，且有分析师指出其历年第一季度常出现强势上涨。若历史重演，FIL或有望突破3美元关键阻力位。 技术分析显示，FIL长期趋势仍偏熊市，需谨慎看待近期涨幅；LINK因2025年中至8月的强势反弹，摆动结构偏多，但成交量指标仍显示空头占优。从纯技术角度，LINK目前比FIL更具买入优势。 整体而言，两者在2026年第一季的表现均存在不确定性，成交量指标反映卖压仍主导市场。投资者若布局AI代币，需设定明确止损位并控制风险。

加密情报平台Santiment在X平台上透露，Filecoin [FIL] 在开发活动方面是领先的AI和大数据代币。Chainlink [LINK] 位列第二，Internet Computer [ICP] 紧随其后。

该平台解释称，开发活动更活跃的项目更有可能获得更高的用户采用率，并随之带来代币需求的增长。

AMBCrypto曾报道大型钱包对LINK代币需求增加的情况。这种积累行为还伴随着Chainlink储备钱包向其持仓中添加了超过9.4万枚LINK代币。

Filecoin同样具备看涨潜力。过去一周其价格上涨了19.5%。一位X平台分析师指出，FIL往往在每年第一季度出现强劲上涨。如果这一模式重演，FIL能涨到多高？它会跑赢Chainlink吗？

分析Filecoin和Chainlink的长期趋势

从技术分析角度看，FIL的内部结构呈看涨态势。但也可以提出看空观点：由于10月10日的暴跌在极端压力条件下将摆动低点设定在0.32美元，因此1.37美元才是需要关注的低点。按此观点，FIL实际上呈现看空结构。

无论哪种情况，整个2025年其更高时间框架趋势始终呈看空态势。3美元心理阻力位已被多次测试，但尚未被有效突破。

如果FIL能重现过去三年第一季度爆发式上涨的模式，那么3美元阻力位转化为支撑位将成为摆动交易者的良好入场信号。

尽管近两周有所上涨，但成交量指标结合长期看空趋势表明FIL多头仍需保持谨慎。

由于2025年6月至8月期间的大幅上涨，LINK的周线摆动结构呈现看涨态势。但在该时间框架下其内部结构仍属看空，成交量指标再次反映了空头主导格局。

从纯技术角度分析，由于LINK的摆动结构看涨，买入Chainlink比买入Filecoin更具优势。

寻求AI代币投资的投资者应注意，山寨币市场整体仍显脆弱。

投资者可以押注第一季度行情复苏提前建仓，但需设定明确的止损位，且承担的风险应低于牛市环境下的常规风险水平。

最终结论

  • 对投资者而言，Chainlink与Filecoin之争没有明确赢家，但FIL在未来几个月具备看涨潜力
  • 长期趋势对多头并不友好，成交量指标显示两种山寨币仍处于卖方主导格局

Related Questions

Q根据Santiment的数据，哪两个AI和大数据代币在开发活动方面领先？

AFilecoin (FIL) 在开发活动方面领先，Chainlink (LINK) 排名第二。

Q为什么Filecoin (FIL) 被认为在未来几个月具有看涨潜力？

AFilecoin在过去一周上涨了19.5%，并且有分析师指出，FIL倾向于在每年第一季度出现强劲反弹，如果这种模式在2026年第一季度重演，它可能具有看涨潜力。

Q从技术分析的角度来看，为什么购买Chainlink (LINK) 比购买Filecoin (FIL) 更有利？

A因为LINK的周度摆动结构是看涨的，这得益于其在2025年6月至8月期间的大幅上涨，而FIL的较长时间框架趋势在整个2025年一直是看跌的。

Q文章中提到，如果FIL想要实现2026年第一季度的爆炸性反弹，一个关键的技术触发点是什么？

A关键的技术触发点是3美元的心理阻力位被有效突破并转化为支撑位。

Q对于考虑投资AI代币的投资者，文章给出了什么建议？

A文章建议投资者应对山寨币市场保持谨慎，如果预期第一季度市场会复苏而购买代币，应设定明确的失效水平，并且不应像在更看涨的市场条件下那样承担过多风险。

Related Reads

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit14m ago

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit14m ago

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

OpenAI's audited financials reveal staggering losses. In 2025, the company reported a net loss attributable to OpenAI of $38.53 billion, a dramatic increase from a $5.1 billion loss in 2024. While revenue grew from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $13.07 billion in 2025, costs skyrocketed to $34 billion. A massive $41.55 billion loss from the fair value change of convertible equity and warrant liabilities, tied to its shift to a for-profit structure, significantly contributed to the 2025 result. Research and development spending reached $19.18 billion in 2025. The filings also show OpenAI paid Microsoft approximately $17.2 billion in 2025 for services, including $10.59 billion categorized under "research and development," likely for model training costs. Other major payments included $867 million from SoftBank and $303 million from Microsoft to OpenAI. The report raises serious concerns about the AI company's path to sustainability and profitability, highlighting financial figures far exceeding external expectations.

marsbit22m ago

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

marsbit22m ago

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

Tencent's AI office assistant, WorkBuddy, has achieved daily active users (DAU) 3-4 times that of the industry's second-place product, primarily driven by non-technical users like HR, operations, and administrative staff. Its rapid growth, starting with a public beta in March 2026, highlights a key strategic divergence from competitors like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code. Unlike those tools, which originated as developer-focused assistants (in command lines or IDEs) and are now expanding towards office scenarios, WorkBuddy was built from the ground up for non-technical office workers. Its development was user-driven, initiated after腾讯云's team observed non-technical employees using their CodeBuddy coding tool for general tasks. WorkBuddy's design is defined by three core decisions aimed at lowering barriers: 1) Using natural language instead of technical concepts, so users describe their goal without needing to understand prompts or agents. 2) Providing pre-packaged "Skill" templates for common office tasks like data processing, content creation, and research. 3) Natively integrating into existing腾讯 ecosystems like腾讯 Docs and WeChat, making the agent a seamless part of the user's workflow rather than a separate tool. This "scenario encapsulation" approach, prioritizing the shortest path for users to get work done, contrasts with the "underlying capability" focus of Codex and Claude, which offer more flexibility but require more technical setup. Analysts confirm WorkBuddy's leading market position in China by mid-2026, with massive user and request growth following its launch. Recognizing the same trend of surging non-technical adoption, OpenAI and Anthropic are now pivoting their products with features like role-based plugins (Codex) and a simplified desktop interface (Claude Cowork). However, adapting tools built for developers requires significant changes to interaction models and integrations. WorkBuddy currently holds an estimated six-month lead in delivering a complete solution for non-technical office users. Its recently launched enterprise version aims to solidify this advantage. The competition underscores two valid paths: embedding agent capabilities directly into familiar work environments versus building powerful, general-purpose agents that users must learn to access. WorkBuddy's early success demonstrates the effectiveness of the former strategy for mainstream office adoption.

marsbit22m ago

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

marsbit22m ago

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

"Sangha, a cryptocurrency mining company, is considering selling its recently operational Genesis bitcoin mining facility in Texas. Despite being profitable due to low-cost power (approximately $32/MWh), the company is exploring a sale, joint venture, or strategic partnership, advised by Marathon Capital. The core value of the 19.9MW site lies not in the mining hardware but in its established, scalable power infrastructure—a direct connection to a 180MW solar farm with plans to expand to 110.4MW. This makes it an attractive, ready-to-use asset for AI or high-performance computing (HPC) companies seeking to avoid lengthy permitting and grid connection processes. Sangha's move reflects a broader industry trend where mining operators are pivoting towards higher-value AI compute opportunities. The decision represents a strategic shift from building a long-term 'win-win-win' mining model to capitalizing on the current premium demand for AI-ready power and data center infrastructure."

marsbit54m ago

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

marsbit54m ago

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns investors against excessive concentration in AI stocks. He argues the current market, dominated by a few AI giants, mirrors historical patterns where revolutionary new technologies lead to high risk, volatility, and uncertainty. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential, Dalio emphasizes that most investors fail at this stage of the cycle by over-concentrating in a handful of leading companies. He cites inherent risks: companies cannot accurately forecast investment needs or external shocks (e.g., monetary policy, geopolitics, taxes), face potential disruption from future technologies and international competition (notably from China), and experience significant price swings. Dalio's core advice is diversification, calling it his "Holy Grail of Investing." He presents a mathematical case that a well-diversified portfolio of 15-20 uncorrelated, good bets offers a superior risk-adjusted return compared to a concentrated position. Dalio also offers a cautious outlook, suggesting U.S. stocks may deliver real returns of -5% to -10% over the next 5-10 years based on valuation and bubble indicators. He concludes that in the face of high uncertainty, the prudent strategy is not to avoid betting entirely, but to avoid large, concentrated bets where one lacks sufficient informational edge. Instead, investors should build a strategically balanced, diversified portfolio.

marsbit1h ago

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy LINK

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ChainLink (LINK) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ChainLink (LINK) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ChainLink (LINK)After purchasing your ChainLink (LINK), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ChainLink (LINK)Easily trade ChainLink (LINK) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

9.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy LINK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LINK (LINK) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow