Sorts out the Whole Process of the Outbreak of This Institutional Liquidity Crisis in One Article

Huobi发布于2022-07-07更新于2022-07-08

文章摘要

The liquidity crisis does not seem to be resolved. Here we brief the process of the crisis.

Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy protection on July 6, marking the second bankruptcy in the crypto industry. However, the liquidity crisis does not seem to be resolved. Here we brief the process of the crisis.

- Fuse : LUNA

On May 8, the pool of UST and the original LUNA were out of balance. In just two days, UST was completely de-anchored from $1. By May 12, LUNA almost hit to zero.

On May 12, Bitcoin fell below $30,000.

- Three Arrows Capital got involved in the LUNA slump

On May 13, Zhu Su, founder of Three Arrows Capital, said that he supported the LUNA community. Note that at this time, Zhu Su was still trying to save the situation and was still active on Twitter to rebuild confidence for investors. At the same time, stETH also started to de-anchor slightly.

On May 17th, Terra founder Do Kwon proposed a plan to revive the Terra. The proposal was passed on May 25th. The original LUNA was completely abandoned.

On May 26, 3AC began to make large ETH transfers on the FTX exchange.

On June 1 and June 2, Size and Laevitas announced that they had received financing led by 3AC, but just the amount is considerably small, at $6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. In retrospect, these two investments should have been made earlier. The announcement at the time was more of a means to stop the spread of investor’s pessimistic sentiment.

- BlockFi surfaced

On June 6, South Korean crypto-asset fintech company Delio announced that it has signed an asset supply contract worth $600 million with crypto lending platform BlockFi and Three Arrows Capital. 3AC and BlockFi should have obtained fiat cash flow from Delio by using crypto assets as collateral. This case may indicate that BlockFi also has liquidity problems.

On June 14, 3AC began to sell stETH in exchange for ETH.

On June 15, Zhu Su, founder of 3AC, posted that he was communicating to solve the liquidity problem. Note that this is the last time Zhu Su appeared on social media and has not been heard from since. On the same day, a source said that 3AC had liquidated $400 million on the lending platform. Since then, there have been reports that 3AC’s ETH has been liquidated.

On the same day, a source said that 3AC liquidated USD 400 million on the lending platform, and the rumors of 3AC’s ETH being liquidated has been heard endlessly since then.

On June 17, Kyle Davies, co-founder of 3AC, said that the collapse of Terra caught us off guard, and it was clear that Terra was the root of all evil.

- Alameda Research and Genesis appear linked to 3AC

On June 18, Genesis reported it had liquidated position of a "large counterparty", which probably referred to 3AC. There are multiple DeFi protocols that say the whereabouts of their funds deposited on the 3AC platform are unknown. Rumors abounded in the market. An anonymous source exposured that 3AC's outstanding debts may hit to US$2 billion, and said they frequently misappropriated client funds.

On the same day, Voyager Digital signed terms with Alameda Research for a loan of $200 million and 15,000 bitcoins.

On June 19, Bitcoin fell below $20,000 while Ethereum fell below $1,000.

On June 21, FTX stepped in to assist BlockFi, helping the latter with a $250 million revolving credit line. SBF, founder of FTX, also stressed that he would prevent the spread of the crisis.

- Voyager Digital announces its debt connection with 3AC

On June 22, Voyager Digital stated that 3AC owed a total of 15,250 BTC and 350 million USDT debt, with a total value of nearly 700 million US dollars. Such a large amount doomed Voyager to go bankrupt.

On June 29, a court in the British Virgin Islands ordered the liquidation of Singapore-based 3AC.

On July 1, Blockchain.com applied to liquidate all of 3AC’s assets. The next day, 3AC sought bankruptcy protection from the New York court, and 3AC has officially entered the bankruptcy stage since then.

On July 2, cryptocurrency broker Voyager Digital announced a suspension of trading and deposits and withdrawals. Its stock price then fell sharply.

On July 6, Voyager Digital became the second institution to go bankrupt. At the same time, the Toronto Stock Exchange launched a delisting review of Voyager Digital. Note that Voyager Digital and Alameda Research also have large financial transactions.

·

In addition to 3AC and Voyager, which have filed for bankruptcy, companies such as BlockFi, Alameda Research, and Genesis have also been affected. At present, BlockFi has received financial support from FTX, Alameda Research is a subsidiary of FTX, and Genesis has received DCG’s support, and it seems that the crisis has been alleviated. Will other companies fail in the next few weeks? Who will be next?

Welcome to leave your comments below:

你可能也喜欢

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

作者Joseph Chalom从亚洲之行中感受到以太坊生态的活力与建设者的雄心。他指出,Electric Capital数据显示以太坊历史开发者总数已突破100万,其中约23.2万人在过去一年保持活跃,这是加密领域最大的技术人才库。 Chalom认为,加密领域的核心问题并非哪条链最快,而是顶尖建设者选择在哪里长期建设。以太坊的显著优势源于十年积累的制度、文化、经济和生态结构,使其成为可编程金融和互联网原生资本形成的默认操作系统。 这百万建设者正致力于解决行业最难的问题:核心协议的可扩展性、隐私、抗量子能力及智能体系统。例如,2026年预计进行的Glamsterdam升级将在不破坏核心原则下提升性能;同步可组合性技术让众多Rollup能像一条链般运作;以太坊在抗量子准备上也处于明显领先地位。 以太坊的深层护城河在于开发者聚集产生的复利效应,以及由此强化的可组合性、共享标准(如EVM和Solidity)和信任。其可信中立性(由超90万验证者保障)、模块化架构(如Base、Arbitrum等Rollup)以及吸引顶尖研究人员的文化,共同巩固了其作为大型机构首选互联网原生金融协调层的地位。Chalom坚信,以太坊的生态系统优势及其汇聚的人才,将持续推动下一代金融基础设施的变革。

marsbit11分钟前

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

marsbit11分钟前

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

SharpLink CEO分享了其对以太坊开发者总数突破100万的见解。根据Electric Capital数据,以太坊历史开发者总数已达1,012,824人,其中约23.2万人在过去一年保持活跃,构成了加密领域最庞大的技术人才库。 作者认为,加密领域的核心竞争并非单纯追求速度与低费用,而是顶尖建设者的选择。以太坊凭借十年积累的制度、文化、经济与生态结构,形成了难以复制的综合优势,已成为可编程金融和互联网原生资本的默认操作系统。 这百万开发者正致力于攻克行业最前沿的挑战:通过预计2026年的Glamsterdam升级提升核心协议可扩展性;通过同步可组合性技术让众多Rollup如一条链般协同工作;以及积极布局抗量子能力,以太坊基金会已成立专门团队推进,目标是2029年前完成迁移。 更深层的护城河在于网络效应:以太坊的可组合性让应用像乐高积木一样互操作,EVM和Solidity技能在数百个网络中通用,形成了“更多开发者→更多工具与流动性→更多应用”的飞轮。此外,由超90万验证者保障的可信中立性、模块化扩展架构以及顶尖的研究与文化氛围,共同巩固了其作为大型机构首选信任层的地位。 作者在访问亚洲以太坊社区后强调,以太坊的竞争优势在于汇聚了改变未来金融的建设者,其生态不仅是链上活跃,更在成为互联网原生金融的长期协调层。

链捕手15分钟前

SharpLink CEO:如何理解以太坊开发者刚刚突破 100 万?

链捕手15分钟前

从身份协议到AI入口,World的野心有多大?

近期,加密市场中的WLD成为焦点,其价格持续上涨,市值突破30亿美元。这一热度源于World项目正式进入“The Simple Plan”第三阶段,其发展逻辑正从早期的代币激励转向实用驱动。World的核心目标是构建全球“人格证明”网络,通过扫描虹膜的World ID解决互联网中验证真实人类身份的关键问题。随着生成式AI爆发,区分真人与AI变得日益紧迫。 World的落地场景正在拓宽,覆盖企业端、个人端及AI Agent端。企业方面,与Zoom等公司合作应对深度伪造;个人层面,瞄准社交与票务等场景的真人验证需求;AI Agent端则推出AgentKit,旨在建立人与AI间的可信授权框架,为未来AI经济奠定信任基础。 市场上涨背后是对“真人身份”稀缺价值的重估。在AI内容成本趋近零的未来,真人身份与行为可能成为稀缺资源。World的运营策略也更聚焦,资源集中于高价值城市以构建网络效应,同时下一代Orb设备将实现自助化以降低扩张成本。 宏观来看,World可能推动加密叙事从金融扩展到身份基础设施,身份或成为可组合资产。它也有望成为AI Agent经济的关键入口,解决Agent归属、可信与验证问题。World ID 4.0引入的费用机制开启了协议的收入来源,使其商业模式更趋清晰。 总之,WLD的上涨反映了市场对World在AI时代定位的认可——其野心是成为验证人类身份的关键入口。随着AI与人的界限模糊,掌握人格证明网络可能意味着掌握下一代互联网的重要枢纽。

marsbit1小时前

从身份协议到AI入口,World的野心有多大?

marsbit1小时前

没有腾讯,燧原还剩什么?

燧原科技科创板IPO获通过,成为国产GPU“四小龙”中最后一家上市的公司。其招股书揭示了一个核心问题:公司营收高度依赖单一客户腾讯,2025年销售额的74.9%(按另一口径超80%)来自腾讯。 与其他“四小龙”先融资、讲故事的路径不同,燧原从成立起就锚定大客户交付,营收增长迅猛,2026年第一季度同比暴增1474.85%。这种陡峭增长源于超级大客户的算力订单集中释放。 腾讯大规模采购燧原芯片,背后是自身庞大的AI算力需求(如混元大模型、元宝等)以及构建可控、稳定算力供应链的战略考量。燧原超过80%的加速卡及模组收入来自推理产品,精准匹配了腾讯大模型落地的急需。 腾讯不仅是燧原第一大客户,也是持股20.26%的第一大股东。这种“股东+客户”的深度绑定,在产业逻辑上被视为供应链培育。腾讯通过确定性订单帮助燧原迭代工艺,而自身业务系统与燧原芯片的深度集成也形成了较高的替换成本,构成了燧原的生态护城河。 行业格局逐渐清晰:英伟达为规则制定者,华为昇腾走国家级路线,而燧原、摩尔线程等商业化玩家则依靠市场订单。燧原的定位愈发偏向“腾讯生态的算力底座”,其产品路线图与腾讯需求高度协同。 文章指出,中国AI芯片行业已告别PPT融资驱动,进入残酷的订单交付周期。未来比拼的关键不再是技术参数,而是订单量、交付能力和生态绑定深度。燧原手握腾讯长期且金额翻倍的采购订单,这或许比技术本身更能体现其现阶段价值。国产芯片的长期主义,在于赢得客户的信任、场景和持续订单。

marsbit1小时前

没有腾讯,燧原还剩什么?

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片