FTX To Release $1.6 Billion In Creditor Repayments Sept. 30 – Details

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-09-21Última atualização em 2025-09-21

Resumo

Reports have disclosed that the FTX Recovery Trust is preparing to release another $1.6 billion to its creditors by September...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Reports have disclosed that the FTX Recovery Trust is preparing to release another $1.6 billion to its creditors by September 30. The payout marks the third distribution since the exchange collapsed in late 2022, and payments are expected to reach verified claimants within three business days once they are processed through BitGo, Kraken, or Payoneer.

FTX: Breakdown Of Payout Classes

The upcoming release will be divided among several groups. US customer claims will get an additional 40% this round, pushing their total recovery to about 95%.

International customers under the dotcom entity will receive another 6%, bringing them closer to 78% overall. General unsecured creditors, along with those holding digital asset loan claims, will see 24% more, which raises their cumulative recovery to nearly 85%.

Convenience claims are also being settled in full, with reports stating they will receive 120% compared to their original claims. These are usually smaller cases that are handled quickly to reduce costs and speed up the overall process.

Verification And Distribution

Creditors who want to access the payout must have completed all required verification steps. The trust has already urged claimants to confirm their chosen payment channel before the deadline, as unverified accounts risk delays.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.98 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Once released, the funds are expected to clear into accounts within days, giving long-awaited relief to thousands who lost money in the collapse.

The payment in September is part of a larger FTX recovery process that has earmarked as much as $16.5 billion in assets to be returned to creditors.

While progress has been steady, many customers have still complained about the freezing of valuations at their November 2022 prices. At that time, digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ether traded far below the levels that would occur in 2025.

FTX: Questions On Fairness Remain

The question of fairness remains. Smaller convenience claims receive more than what they lost, while large creditors argue theirs should be weighed against the stagnant valuations of their assets.

This was intended under the company’s legal documents to facilitate administration and avoid extensive litigation, but it raised the ire of foreign creditors that have greater impediments than creditors situated in the US.

For now, the $1.6 billion payment is yet another milestone to the FTX rescue process, but it does not solve all the complaints.

With billions already paid out in previous rounds, the trust is still under pressure to continue disbursing and to finally bring closure to one of the largest cryptocurrency bankruptcies in history.

Featured image from Andrey Rudakov/Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHá 7h

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHá 7h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片