FOMC countdown – Here’s why Bitcoin bulls might need to watch out

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-15Last updated on 2025-09-16

Key Takeaways

Could the FOMC change the game?

Dovish vibes look priced in, and macro flows into ETFs, treasuries, and AI are still capping Bitcoin.

Why is Bitcoin lagging tech and alts?

Because risk capital is rotating into equities and altcoins, with Nasdaq at ATH and SOL tripling BTC’s ROI.


The U.S. stock market is buzzing. 

The S&P500 index has surged by nearly 32% off its April low. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite Index rallied by 50% to hit a new all-time high. On the contrary, Bitcoin’s [BTC] price dropped by 38% on the price charts.

As expected, this divergence is now showing up on-chain. In fact, the BTC–Nasdaq correlation flipped negative to -0.14 at press time – Marking its lowest level since September 2024. Simply put, this means that Bitcoin may be starting to lag tech.

BTC-NASDAQBTC-NASDAQ

Source: CryptoQuant

According to AMBCrypto, such a decoupling is a sign of risk capital rotating into equities. With the FOMC less than 48 hours out and 96% odds of a 400–425 bps cut, traders may be clearly front-running a bullish setup in U.S stocks.

On the weekly, the Nasdaq blasted to an ATH, while BTC seemed to be stuck 7% below its $124k ATH. As David Hernandez from 21Shares told AMBCrypto, it’s a clear signal that risk-seeking investors are looking beyond Bitcoin.

“With macro uncertainty before next week mostly out of the way, all eyes are on Chair Powell and the Fed, where a rate cut and dovish forward guidance could catapult Bitcoin back to $118K-$120K. The rate cut opens the door for risk-seeking investors to look beyond Bitcoin too – to tokens like Solana and XRP, whose ETFs are highly anticipated to debut this fall.”

Bitcoin faces headwinds from alternative asset flows

Altcoins are clearly giving Bitcoin a run for its money this cycle.

On 8 September, TOTAL2 (ex-BTC market cap) topped $1.74 trillion, grabbing 45.8% of the market share. What’s more, the Altcoin Season Index ripped to 80 – Its highest level since the election run.

Supporting this move, the SOL/BTC ratio jumped by 10.5% in a month, with Solana [SOL] spiking by nearly 3x vs BTC’s 6% ROI. Adding firepower, 16 treasuries now hold 10.29 million SOL, keeping capital locked in alt momentum.

SOLSOL

Source: TradingView (SOL/BTC)

In short, Bitcoin’s post-FOMC dovish vibes might be getting ahead of themselves.

The cycle’s shifted, with risk-assets front-running flows and keeping BTC in check. ETFs, treasuries, and AI hype are some of the macro plays sucking up capital, something even David Hernandez from 21Shares flagged.

“Momentum in the broader digital asset market has also picked up. Ethereum and Solana have seen sizeable gains recently, in large part driven by a wave of announcements from Digital Asset Treasury Companies (“DATcos”) planning to hold major cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets – a development reviving institutional interest.”

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbit24m ago

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbit24m ago

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight News31m ago

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight News31m ago

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbit46m ago

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbit46m ago

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbit53m ago

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片