Bitcoin traders alert – Could BTC mirror a potential S&P 500 dip?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-09Last updated on 2025-09-10

Key Takeaways

The U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Spread is showing a reversal pattern that may directly impact Bitcoin’s price. Global liquidity has experienced a slight shift, even as Bitcoin and the overall crypto market capitalization continue to rise.


In recent days, the global cryptocurrency market capitalization has recorded notable liquidity inflows.

After weeks of decline that pushed it below the $4 trillion milestone, the market is on the path to reclaim this level, standing at $3.88 trillion at press time.

Bitcoin [BTC] maintains dominance with over 50% of this valuation. Analysts suggest the asset could see further inflows as global liquidity continues to shift.

Yield could decide Bitcoin’s fate

Macro sentiment continues to play a crucial role in Bitcoin’s performance, according to new insights from Alphractal.

The 10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Spread, a key indicator often used to forecast the direction of the S&P 500, is now showing a historically significant setup. Its swings, both positive and negative, have consistently signaled broader equity market trends.

Historically, when this spread turns positive, it has often preceded bear markets in the S&P 500.

At present, the spread is approaching a potential positive flip on the chart, suggesting that the S&P 500 may be heading for a downturn. 

Given Bitcoin’s strong correlation with equity markets, especially the S&P 500, this shift could exert downward pressure on the cryptocurrency as well.

Treasury vs. S&P 500 chart.Treasury vs. S&P 500 chart.

Source: Alphractal

Annual return comparisons reinforce this correlation. Between 2021 and 2023, Bitcoin gained 282%, while the S&P 500 posted 55% during the same two-year span. This suggests that if equities face a sharp decline, Bitcoin will likely mirror that downturn.

Global liquidity continues to play a core role in this dynamic. Historically, Bitcoin has reacted closely to liquidity shifts.

At the time of writing, global liquidity is showing a 0.32% decline over the past day, an outflow that directly correlates with the current Treasury Yield Curve trend.

U.S. and Korean investors’ role

U.S. and Korean investors are showing diverging approaches in the current market, though both remain tilted toward bullish positioning, according to CryptoQuant.

At press time, both the Coinbase Premium Index and the Korean Premium Index reflected contrasting investor sentiment.

The Coinbase Premium Index, which tracks U.S. investor activity, was trending upward with a reading of 0.006, showing continued buying interest.

In contrast, the Korean Premium Index declined by 0.4, suggesting that Korean investors were reducing their exposure.

Coinbase premium indexCoinbase premium index

Source: CryptoQuant

This divergence highlights an important dynamic: while U.S. investors are steadily accumulating, Korean investors are trimming positions.

If U.S. buyers maintain their momentum and Korean investors return to positive inflows, Bitcoin could experience a stronger positive outcome in the market.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbit11m ago

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbit11m ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbit11m ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片