Участник ICO Ethereum направил в стейкинг монеты на $665 млн

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-03-04Last updated on 2025-09-05

5 сентября участвовавший в ICO кит отправил на стейкинговый адрес 150 000 ETH (~$665 млн) после четырех лет бездействия.

通过以太坊 ICO 获得 100 万枚 ETH 的远古巨鲸/机构,在休眠了 4 年之久后,今天醒来把 15 万枚 ETH ($6.46 亿) 存进了以太坊质押。

◎他们最初是通过 3 个地址在 2015 年以太坊 ICO 获得了 100 万枚的 ETH,最近一次的操作已经是 4 年前 (2021/7):把 5.5 万枚 ETH 转进了 Gemini,当时 ETH 价格为… pic.twitter.com/y7MOe69Lt7

— 余烬 (@EmberCN) September 5, 2025

Согласно ончейн-данным, крупный инвестор приобрел 1 млн ETH через три адреса в ходе первичного предложения 2015 года.

В последний раз он перемещал свои активы в 2021 году, отправив 55 000 ETH на биржу Gemini. Тогда курс монеты находился на уровне $2500.

Он по-прежнему владеет 250 000 ETH стоимостью около $1,1 млрд, включая отправленные в стейкинг активы.

Ранее аналитики Santiment сообщили, что за последние пять месяцев крупные игроки увеличили свои запасы второй по капитализации криптовалюты на 14%, закупив 5,54 млн ETH.

В общей сложности Ethereum-киты владеют 42,5 млн ETH на сумму $186,4 млрд — приблизительно 35% от циркулирующего предложения.

Параллельно другой крупный держатель переместил часть своих биткоинов — 479 BTC стоимостью более $54 млн.

Источник: mempool.space.

Кит «проснулся» впервые с 2012 года, до этого на адрес поступали относительно небольшие суммы монет.

Напомним, CEO Bitcoin Magazine Дэвид Бейли обвинил двух китов в «торможении» биткоина. Упомянутые им кошельки продали 80 000 BTC и 120 000 BTC.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit25m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit25m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit29m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit29m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit30m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit30m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit34m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片