以太坊多空对决:鲸鱼抛售 VS 鲨鱼扫货,谁将主导战局?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-08-20Last updated on 2025-08-20

Abstract

尽管面临市场压力,以太坊的看涨潜力依然保持稳定。

关键要点

以太坊价格上涨的同时,活跃地址数量有所下降。然而,整体市场活动表明,价格大幅下跌的可能性较小,市场目前处于中性与看涨之间。

以太坊 [ETH]在过去一周内多次尝试看涨,资产价格上涨至接近 4,891 美元的历史高点。

然而,看涨势头难以维持,因为资产继续走低,形成新低,截至发稿时的价值为 4,225 美元。

值得注意的是,AMBCrypto 的研究表明,尽管价格下跌,但 ETH 多头仍然很有可能重新控制市场并推动持续上涨。

鲸鱼撤退,但鲨鱼吞噬了 440 万 ETH

Alphractal的最新分析显示,鲸鱼在出售其持有的 ETH 时正在退出。

鲸鱼通常是该资产的最大持有者,随着他们的抛售,他们的供应份额一直在下降——这是一个明显的抛售压力信号。

从历史上看,ETH 与比特币的相关性表明,当鲸鱼出售比特币时,另一群人——鲨鱼——会积累该资产,这通常会引发反弹。

这些“鲨鱼”持有 10,000 到 100,000 个 ETH,在这种情况下,随着“鲸鱼”退出市场,他们一直在不断积累。

从 4 月份开始的过去 5 个月里,这群投资者已经从市场上吸金 440 万 ETH。

在“鲨鱼”持续囤币的同时,AMBCrypto 也注意到了市场中另一个看涨的趋势。据CryptoQuant的数据,以太坊的总质押量一直在稳步上升。

质押资产的增加表明市场情绪看涨,因为越来越多的投资者着眼于长期投资。目前,质押的 ETH 供应量已飙升至 3600 万 ETH。

交易所储备增加引发谨慎情绪

加密货币交易所的 ETH 储备量也有所增加。截至本文撰写时,交易所的 ETH 储备量已达到 1840 万。

资产流入交易所通常暗示着迫在眉睫的抛售压力,因为代币一旦通过现货交易存入交易所就更容易变现。

然而,对现货交易活动的分析表明,基于现货平均订单规模,订单规模保持正常,这表明目前卖出或买入都没有出现激增。

尽管如此,市场动态似乎倾向于多头,特别是随着质押活动的增加。

活跃地址激增增强了 ETH 的看涨理由

对以太坊地址(发送者和接收者)的分析显示,其数量呈稳步上升趋势。

如图所示,通过查看活跃地址变动和 ETH 价格,我们可以发现,历史上,活动的总体增长与 ETH 价格飙升呈相关性。

目前,地址活跃度急剧上升。如果这种上升趋势持续下去,ETH 的价格很可能也会延续同样的走势,从而支撑看涨复苏的预期。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

The article challenges the notion that value investing in US stocks is equivalent to fundamental investing. It uses the astronomical analogy of Henrietta Leavitt separating a star's apparent brightness from its intrinsic luminosity to illustrate a key investment framework: an observed valuation multiple (like brightness) conflates two things—the actual quality of a business and the premium the market is willing to pay for its future (its "distance" or duration). The author argues that the popular narrative of "fundamentals are dead"—fueled by momentum and concentration in mega-cap tech—is flawed. While recognizing factors like winner-take-all dynamics and AI scale advantages, the piece warns against confusing broad thematic truths (e.g., "AI is big") with justified valuations for specific companies. It introduces a 2x2 matrix categorizing stocks based on whether they *looked* cheap/expensive at a point in time versus whether they *were* actually cheap/expensive in hindsight (e.g., expensive-looking Meta in 2022 was actually cheap). The core formula presented is: Forward Return ≈ Fundamental Growth × Change in Valuation Multiple. Over short periods, multiple changes drive returns, making markets seem narrative-driven. Over the long term, fundamental growth dominates. The article concludes that markets may be becoming *less* efficient due to complex, long-duration business models, narrative cycles, and private market dynamics, creating more opportunities for investors who can disentangle real quality from market sentiment.

marsbit49m ago

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片