降息预期太乐观了?美国“粘性通胀”正在重新加速

华尔街见闻Published on 2025-08-18Last updated on 2025-08-18

Abstract

目前市场对7月CPI报告的解读相对乐观。但摩根大通表示,多项替代通胀指标显示,通胀不仅未能继续下行,核心通胀的粘性部分正重新加速,且其坚挺程度还有相当部分与关税无关。除非经济陷入衰退,否则通胀的持续坚挺将不支持美联储采取更激进的宽松政策。

摩根大通警告,美国通胀正呈现出比预期更加顽固的态势,多项替代通胀指标均表明去通胀进程已经停滞,核心通胀的粘性部分正重新加速,这一趋势可能限制美联储进一步激进降息的空间。

目前市场对7月CPI报告的解读相对乐观,但摩根大通表示,包括削减均值和中位数通胀在内的多项基础通胀指标显示,通胀不仅未能继续下行,核心通胀的粘性成份正重新加速,且其坚挺程度还有相当部分与关税无关。这意味着通胀可能在高于美联储目标的水平上保持粘性。

分析师Michael Hanson警告,虽然联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)目前专注于管理劳动力市场下行风险,但通胀偏离其目标的程度明显更大。除非经济陷入衰退,否则通胀的持续坚挺将不支持美联储采取更激进的宽松政策。

替代通胀指标发出警告信号

美联储对潜在持续高于目标通胀的担忧似乎并非空穴来风。

根据亚特兰大联储的统计拆分,传统核心CPI组成部分中(粘性+灵活),粘性组件继续略高于疫情前平均水平,并在近期有所加速。

基础数据显示,虽然波动较大的灵活组件在今年早些时候飙升后,已在三个月年化基础上重新回到负值区间,但粘性组件近月来重新加速。

历史上,粘性组件往往以服务业为主导,这种坚挺程度是在关税商品压力之外的额外因素。

摩根大通认为,克利夫兰联储的削减均值和中位数通胀指标为投资者提供了比传统排除法更可靠的通胀趋势判断。

最新数据显示,削减均值通胀在疫情前平均为2.1%,目前已从4月3.0%的低点反弹至7月的3.2%。中位数通胀的表现更加令人担忧,从疫情前的2.6%平均水平跃升至当前的3.6%。

这些指标通过算法剔除每次CPI发布中的极端值,专注于价格变动分布的中间部分。削减均值排除了价格变动最高和最低的8%,而中位数则代表了CPI各项价格变动的精确中点。

从三个月年化增长率来看,削减均值基本持平,中位数近月来实际上有所缓解。但两个系列的运行速度仍保持在3%以上,相对于历史水平和美联储2%的通胀目标都偏高。随着关税传导效应变得更加普遍,这一趋势可能再次走高。

货币政策前景面临挑战

分析师认为,当前的通胀格局为美联储货币政策决策带来了复杂挑战。

多项替代核心指标表明——通胀仍远高于美联储2%的目标,并可能继续走高。这种在非关税部门的通胀坚挺尤其值得关注,因为它指向通胀可能在令人不安的高位保持持续。

摩根大通分析认为,除非出现经济衰退,否则通胀可能在不支持美联储更激进宽松政策的水平上保持粘性。

这一判断为当前市场对美联储快速降息的预期蒙上了阴影,投资者可能需要重新评估货币政策正常化的时间表和幅度。

Related Reads

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbit2h ago

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit2h ago

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手3h ago

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手3h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit3h ago

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit3h ago

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手3h ago

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片