Ethereum: Holder accumulation slows, holders in profit soars – What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-07-27Last updated on 2025-07-28

Key Takeaways

The high percentage of holders in profit might also hurt Ethereum’s rally, but one crucial aspect overshadows these developments.


Over the weekend, Ethereum [ETH] has risen by 4.09%. The leading altcoin managed to defend the $3,700 support level and has also succeeded in climbing above the $3,860 local high from the 21st of July.

Ethereum 4-hour Chart

Source: ETH/USDT on TradingView

The price move above last week’s high also marked a breakout past a short-term range. The trading volume has not been high, which hints that the breakout might not have the legs to climb higher.

The CMF agreed with the lack of strong buying pressure over the past couple of days, with a reading of 0.0. The MACD underlined the bullish momentum behind the breakout. The next resistance level is at $4.1k.

On-chain metrics showed that a high percentage of holders were in profit, and the holder accumulation ratio saw a slight drop in recent days. Could this mean that the market is overextended and in need of a reset?

Ethereum might have more gas in the tank

Ethereum Holder Accumulation RatioEthereum Holder Accumulation Ratio

Source: Glassnode

The holder accumulation ratio measures the proportion of active holders who are increasing their positions. Ratios above 50% are a bullish signal, showing accumulation behavior among holders.

It saw an uptrend from May to early July, but has fallen slightly over the past week. Moreover, the ratio was not above 50%.

It hinted that network accumulation might not be fueling the Ethereum rally in recent weeks.

ETH Percent Supply in ProfitETH Percent Supply in Profit

Source: Glassnode

AMBCrypto found that the percentage of supply in profit was at 98.1%. ETH tends to make a local high when this metric goes past 95%. It did so in March, June, and December 2024.

If the trend continues, ETH might be headed for another pullback.

The evidence in favor of ETH

On the other hand, the 2020-2021 bull run saw the percent supply in profit stay above 95% for the most part from November 2020 to May 2021.

If this historical precedent is repeated, Ethereum might have another six months to trend higher.

The ETF netflows have been positive for nearly every trading day in July. The $452 million inflows on the 25th of July marked the 16th consecutive day when ETH spot ETFs had positive netflows.

The run began on the 3rd of July, according to data from Farside.

Combined with the growth of Ethereum treasury companies and their stock performances, it appeared likely that high institutional demand would fuel ETH’s rally.

Hence, the dip in holder accumulation ratio and the high percent supply in profit might not hurt the altcoin’s strongly bullish outlook for the coming months.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: A Nuanced Competitive Reshuffle The launch of OUSD, a new stablecoin initiative, has complex implications for the stablecoin market. For Circle (CRCL), the initial 15-20% stock drop reflects legitimate competitive concerns but is not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantages. A potential restructuring or termination of its Coinbase partnership could even double its net revenue in the short term, providing more competitive freedom. However, OUSD, backed by Stripe's engineering and product strengths, could become the default stablecoin within the Stripe ecosystem for new adopters, challenging USDC's position. OUSD does not solve the core barrier for corporate adoption: it remains a credit exposure to its issuer (likely a Bridge-related entity), which, like Circle, is not an investment-grade entity. Large banks and asset managers could still capture the most lucrative enterprise use cases. Circle must accelerate its payment/fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. For Tether, OUSD targets a different market segment. Tether will continue focusing on distribution channels not prioritized by Stripe or Circle. Its market share may decline over time, but within a significantly growing total market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the key selling points of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may diminish as frameworks mature. This poses a more existential challenge, explaining Paxos's recent shift back to its brokerage-as-a-service business.

marsbit1h ago

The Impact of OUSD on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Landscape

marsbit1h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

This article analyzes the impact of the newly announced stablecoin OUSD, backed by a consortium including Stripe, on major incumbents like Circle (USDC), Tether (USDT), and Paxos (USDG). For Circle, the announcement is not a simple negative. While the initial market reaction was rational, it's not a "death sentence." Circle retains deep liquidity, existing integrations, and first-mover advantage. A potential restructuring or termination of its exclusive revenue-sharing deal with Coinbase could even near-double its net income in the short term, providing more competitive flexibility. However, within the Stripe ecosystem, OUSD, with its strong engineering and product focus, could become the default choice, displacing USDC for new integrations. Circle must accelerate its own fintech product development and consider defensive M&A. OUSD does not directly threaten Tether's core markets, which focus on different distribution channels. Tether's market share may decline over time but within a significantly growing overall market. Paxos faces the greatest pressure. OUSD undermines the primary value proposition of its USDG stablecoin, and Paxos's regulatory advantages may erode as frameworks mature, posing a more existential challenge. This explains Paxos's recent strategic pivot towards brokerage-as-a-service. A fundamental unresolved issue for enterprise adoption remains: if issued by a Bridge-related entity, OUSD, like USDC, still represents a credit exposure to a non-investment-grade issuer, unless a parent company guarantee is provided. Large banks and asset managers entering the space later could still compete for the most lucrative enterprise use cases.

链捕手1h ago

OUSD's Impact on Circle, Tether, and Paxos: Not a Simple Negative, but a More Complex Competitive Reshuffle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片