Ethereum Name Service rally faces doubt as traders short: Will bulls hold $26?

AmbcryptoPublished on 2025-07-16Last updated on 2025-07-17

Abstract

If bulls maintain control, ENS could test the $30 resistance next. However, if selling pressure increases, a retracement toward $23.06 is likely.

Key Takeaways


Ethereum Name Service just hit a 5-month high amid a strong spot market breakout. Can ENS flip $30 if shorts keep stacking up?

Ethereum Name Service [ENS] jumped 18.2% to reach a 5-month high of $26.76, breaking out from its long-standing downtrend.


Over the same period, trading volume spiked 197% to $369 million, indicating heightened on-chain and speculative activity.


The real question now: is this a flash rally, or the start of a bigger trend?


Buy-side pressure builds on spot markets


For the first time in 2025, Ethereum Name Service recorded four consecutive days of positive Buy-Sell Delta. 


On the 16th of July, ENS recorded 443k in Buy Volume compared to 363k in Sell Volume, reflecting a higher demand. The same pattern appeared over the past three days, with buy volume surpassing sell one. 

ENS buy sell volume
ENS buy sell volume

Source: Coinalyze


As a result, the market recorded a positive Buy-Sell Delta of 80k as of this writing, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation. 


Santiment data added weight to this thesis. ENS’ Price–DAA Divergence stayed positive all week—suggesting rising network usage alongside the price increase.


That’s typically a sign that user growth is fueling the rally, not just speculation.

Ethereum Name Service Price DAA Divergence
Ethereum Name Service Price DAA Divergence

Source: Santiment


Derivatives traders aren’t buying the breakout


Interestingly, when we examine Ethereum Name Services derivatives, it seems investors rushed into the market to bet against the market. 

ENS Derivatives data analysis
ENS Derivatives data analysis

Source: CoinGlass


According to CoinGlass, Open Interest jumped 47.77% to $132.19 million, while derivatives volume soared 220.68% to $517.93 million.


But the broader Long/Short Ratio didn’t flip bullish, remaining at 0.97 as of press time. Short Positions still made up 50.75% of trades.

ENS long short ratio
ENS long short ratio

Source: CoinGlass


Even on Binance, Long/Short Ratios for top traders hovered between 1.36 and 1.69, showing only moderate long-side conviction.


This indicates skepticism across futures traders, many of whom appear to be shorting the rally.


Is profit-taking underway?


Unsurprisingly, as prices rallied, it created a profit-taking window for holders who had been underwater for the past 5 months. 


Netflow data showed $3.46 million worth of ENS moving to exchanges—the highest level this year.


For three consecutive days, positive Netflows suggest traders may be locking in profits after holding through months of underwater prices.

Ethereum name service spot netflow
Ethereum name service spot netflow

Source: Coinglass


When Exchanges recorded positive Netflow, it indicates more deposits than withdrawals, confirming aggressive profit taking. 


Can ENS continue with the uptrend?


According to AMBCrypto’s analysis, Ethereum Name Service experienced a strong upswing as demand recovered. 


As a result, the altcoins’ Stochastic RSI surged to 100, edging into the overbought zone. At the same time, RVGI surged to 0.37, signaling strong upward momentum. 

ENS stoch & RVGI
ENS stoch & RVGI

Source: TradingView


While these indicators support buyer dominance, they also raise the risk of volatility ahead.


If bulls maintain control, ENS could test the $30 resistance next. However, if selling pressure increases, a retracement toward $23.06 is likely.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit24m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit24m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit29m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit29m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit30m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit30m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit34m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片