Solana最强“印钞机”的豪赌:PUMP代币能否打破Meme币“归零魔咒”

marsbitPublished on 2025-06-19Last updated on 2025-06-20

据各大媒体援引知情人士消息,pump.fun 准备以 40 亿美元估值出售 25% 的 PUMP 代币以筹集 10 亿美元。这个价格有吸引力吗?Messari 的 Sunny Shi 为 PUMP 构建了一个估值模型,结果显示其 FDV(完全流通市值)可能达 70 亿美元。如果预测正确,则 PUMP 代币买到就是赚到。但有一个重要前提。以下是他们的估值过程(Sunny Shi 视角,「我们」指 Messari):

无论你怎么看待迷因币(Memecoin),这个赛道依旧在持续「印钞」。尽管 pump.fun 发币平台的交易量相比年初有所下滑,但仍远高于 2024 年大部分时间的水平。

Solana

Pump.fun 的交易量高于 24 年的多数时间,数据:Messari

人们可能也低估了 PumpSwap 的成功。这个 DEX 在大约三个月前上线,但已经显著蚕食了 Raydium 在 Solana 上的市场份额。

Solana

PumpSwap 与 Raydium 的市场份额对比,数据:Messari

我们的估值方法采用自上而下(top-down)的模型,假设了加密市场整体交易量、Solana 占比、启动平台份额和 PumpSwap 市场份额。这些假设和模型仅对企业客户开放,但我会分享主要结论。

Solana

在我们的基本情景(base case)中,我们认为 Memecoin 会在更广泛的加密经济中占据一个细分市场,因为它们比 NFT 更适合投机用途。当然,Solana 生态随着成熟无疑会向新的资产对多元化发展,但这点也很可能成立。

我们认为,即使 pump.fun 在 Solana 生态内占据的份额略有下降,但 PumpSwap 持续增长,pump 项目仍然有望在未来两年内产生约 6.75 亿美元的收入。按 10 倍估值倍数计算,对应的 FDV 为约 70 亿美元。

然而,关键前提是:如果项目方选择一种不透明的代币 / 股权结构,将大部分收入分配给内部人士而非代币持有者,那我们认为当前市场已变得相当谨慎,不会忽视这种糟糕的价值积累方式。在我们的完整报告中,我们提供了估值表格,用于根据代币持有者能获取的收入百分比来评估 PUMP 的潜在价值。

无论市场最终如何判断,这都是一个参与史上最赚钱的加密应用的绝佳机会。现在就看项目团队是否给予代币持有者足够的参与价值(buy-in),使其成为一项值得投资的项目了。

编者注:在 Aevo 的盘前永续交易市场上,此刻 PUMP 的价格为 6 美元,对应 60 亿的 FDV(完全流通市值)。

Solana

PUMP 在 Aevo 上的盘前价格

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Spicy Review|Is the "Most Emotionally Valuable" Post Here? Could STRC Be the Next LUNA?

Here is an English summary of the article (under 1500 characters): This article from the spicy commentary series "LaPing" covers three key stories in the crypto world for the week. First, during a sharp market downturn in June where BTC fell over 20%, a Reddit post on r/Cryptocurrency rallying against "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)" went viral. The comment section became a hub for retail traders to share memes and encouragement, with many advocating holding (HODLing) through the volatility, embodying the "be fearful when others are greedy" mantra. Second, it examines the situation with STRG (Strategy's perpetual preferred stock), which has "de-pegged," trading around $76 vs. its $100 face value, a ~25% discount. The concern is whether Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, can sustain the $1.2 billion annual dividend payment, given its ~$1.4 billion cash reserve. While analysts note STRG is fundamentally different from the catastrophic LUNA collapse—as Saylor isn't obligated to pay the dividend—risks remain. If MicroStrategy's (MSTR) common stock investors feel their capital is being prioritized for STRG dividends, it could hurt MSTR demand. Third, the article analyzes the online persona of "Chuan Mu," a trader famous for turning $500 into $1 million during the 2023 ORDI inscription boom and again with short positions in 2025. An analysis of his 1,828 tweets reveals his success stems from a top-down analytical framework, asking systemic questions like "Where will the bottleneck be in the AI supply chain?" rather than chasing individual pumps. His investments migrated from crypto-linked stocks to AI infrastructure plays like SK Hynix and Samsung. However, the piece also notes criticism that he has occasionally "pumped" assets and sold positions without notifying followers, creating a contradictory public image. The weekly recap highlights themes of community sentiment during bear markets, financial instrument risks, and the complex realities of following influential online traders.

Foresight News34m ago

Spicy Review|Is the "Most Emotionally Valuable" Post Here? Could STRC Be the Next LUNA?

Foresight News34m ago

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit1h ago

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片