盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-04-30Last updated on 2025-04-30

Abstract

从MEME、AI Agent到SocialFi赛道,Solana正在「全民Launchpad」。

原文作者:Nancy,PANews

伴随资金回流与情绪复苏,链上世界正在悄然升温,不少新兴的代币发行平台也开始轮番对龙头 Pump.fun 展开吸血攻击。本文 PANews 盘点了近期关注度较高的 10 个 Launchpad 平台新秀,涉及 MEME、AI Agent 和 SocialFi 赛道,主要集中在 Solana 生态。这些平台各具特色,大多依托于坚实的生态基础和资源优势,并通过优化发行机制、丰富创作者激励、增强代币赋能以及提升平台安全性等创新机制和差异化定位争夺市场份额。

LaunchLab

LaunchLab 是基于 Solana 的代币发行平台,由 Raydium 在今年 4 月中旬推出。创作者使用 JustSendIt 模式发布代币,一旦流动性达到 85 枚 SOL,代币将立即迁移至 Raydium 的 AMM。LaunchLab 提供了多种自定义选项,包括代币供应设定、分发曲线、归属期等,并可选择获得 10% 交易手续费分成。平台交易费为 1% ,其中 50% 归社区池, 25% 用于$RAY 回购, 25% 用于项目基础设施和运营。4 月 26 日,Raydium 宣布已开放 5 万枚 RAY 奖励池,用于奖励使用 LaunchLab 进行交易的用户。

盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

根据 Dune 数据显示,截至 4 月 29 日,LaunchLab 已发行 24916 枚代币,毕业率为 0.84%。从代币创建数量来看,自 LaunchLab 在 4 月 16 日推出后,代币的发行量一度处于低迷状态,通常为数百个,但自 4 月 25 日以来代币发行量显著增加,日发行量达数千个。而在 210 个毕业项目中,总交易额主要集中在 LetsBONK、TIME 和 Hosico 代币,累计交易额接近 3.5 亿美元,剩余代币的交易额大多集中在数万至数十万美元之间。

Letsbonk.Fun

盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

基于 Solana 的 Letsbonk.Fun 是由 MEME 币 BONK 社区成员与 Raydium 合作开发,允许用户通过点击「创建代币」、填写代币详情和自定义供应量创建的简单步骤创建自己的 MEME 币,并为开发者提供了钱包标签和绑定曲线等功能,代币上线后可快速接入 Raydium 和 Jupiter 等 DEX。平台上的每笔交易都会收取 1% 的手续费,用于开发资金池、BONKsol 验证者以及回购并销毁 BONK。平台用户也可参与 LaunchLab 的 5 万枚 RAY 奖池。

Arc Forge

Arc Forge 由 Solana 上的 AI Agent 项目 arc 在今年 2 月中旬推出的 Agent 代币发行解决方案。该平台基于 Meteora DLMM 构建并与 Jupiter 路由集成,具有更高效的流动性、防止抢单机器人和定制流动性策略等主要优势,只有经过审查的高质量项目可参与。

auto.fun

auto.fun 是 Eliza Labs 推出的基于 Solana 的无代码 AI 代理 Launchpad 平台,用于发行新的代币和自主代理,原生代币是 ai16z,该平台允许用户在无需技术背景的情况下部署复杂的人工智能代理,采用了更加公平的代币发行机制。auto.fun 采用了一个双池系统:SOL:AT 主池为平台的主要流动性池,将新发布的代理代币(AT)与 SOL 配对,并通过 Raydium 提供流动性;$ai16z:AT 为未来阶段的目标,旨在通过回购平台收入中的$ai16z 与 AT 进行流动性配对。每个在 auto.fun 上发布的项目都会获得一个由 Raydium 提供支持的流动性 NFT,可赋予项目创作者对流动性的所有权,并通过 NFT 实现持续的收益捕捉。在每个 AT 代币的流动性池中,auto.fun 会收取 10% 的费用,这些费用将用于从市场回 $ai16z 代币。根据官网显示,截至 4 月 27 日,auto.fun 上的代币市值最高也仅为数十万美元。

Time.fun

Time.fun 是从 Base 迁移至 Solana 生态的时间代币化平台,创作者需通过平台界面注册,可自定义代币名称、符号和初始供应量,并设定时间服务的定价(以 USDC 计),但需进行身份验证。

Time.fun 在过去两个月被 Solana 联创 toly 频繁推荐,近期他更是在该平台上发起一场拍卖会,吸引了超过 120 万美元的投标总额,三位创业者赢得了向 Toly 本人及 Solana 生态社区进行项目路演的机会,将于 5 月 6 日在直播中介绍自己的创业项目并接受 Toly 的现场点评。

盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

根据 Dune 数据,截至 4 月 28 日,Time.fun 平台累计发行代币数量仅为 396 个,但日发行量自上线首日创下高峰后持续下滑,甚至多日发行量降至个位数甚至为零。同时,平台的总交易额累计超 2 亿美元,其中上线 Solana 首日便贡献逾 1 亿美元,随后交易额逐步回落,目前维持在数万至数十万美元区间。交易额主要由代币 $toly 拉动,长期占比超过一半。

Genesis Launches

盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

Genesis Launches 是由基于 Base 和 Solana 上的 Virtuals Protocol 近期推出的发射平台,核心目标是让社区用户公平早期参与新 AI Agent 项目的孵化、防止机器人和狙击手低价抢筹以及保护参与者资金安全。每个新项目以 11.2 万枚$VIRTUAL(约 12 万美元)的固定稀释市值起步,用户通过质押 Virgin Points 参与,每轮有 24 小时竞拍期,积分越多,分配越高。目前,用户有三种主要方式可以赚取积分:通过投资 Sentient 和 Prototype Agent 代币赚取 Trenchor 积分、持有$VIRTUAL 代币赚取以及质押$VADER 代币赚取,未被使用的积分将在 30 天后过期。

Shell Launchpad

Shell Launchpad 是 BNB Chain 上 AI Agent 平台 MyShel 推出的,旨在帮助用户轻松启动并代币化他们的 AI Agent。该平台多种创建模式,包括经典模式、专业配置模式和 ShellAgent 模式,分别满足新手用户、一定技术背景的开发者和专业开发者设计。Shell Launchpad 提供 300+模块化 AI 小部件,用户可以快速组合并构建出复杂的 AI Agent,并根据需求设定自己 AI Agent 的名称、描述、代币、类别等基本信息,并且配置代币经济模型,包括总供应量、募资金额等。一旦 AI Agent 的融资达到目标,平台会自动在 DEX 上线。

Swarms LaunchPad

Swarms LaunchPad 是 Solana 上 AI Agent 项目 Swarms 开发的 AI 代理代币发行平台,用于创建、部署、代币化和货币化智能代理。用户可通过 Swarms SDK(支持 Python/Rust SDK)构建定制化 AI 代理,并将自己开发的 AI 代理上传进行代币化,通过 Swarms Dex 进行交易,这些代币化的 AI 代理可以在 Swarms 市场上出售或租赁,开发者通过购买费用、租赁分成或交易收益获利。高质量代理的开发者可获得额外的 SWARMS 代币奖励。

近期,Swarms LaunchPad 进行了重大升级,包括性能优化、集成 Gecko Terminal、新增评论功能和持仓页面,以及源代码已完全开源至 GitHub 等。

盘点10个值得关注的Launchpad平台新秀

Swarms LaunchPad 官网显示,截至 4 月 29 日,该平台上的 Agent 总数为 20 个,总市值约为 150 万美元。

someting

目前,someting 尚未正式推出,仍处于白名单阶段。根据已知信息,someting 已与 Meteora 合作,包括单边流动性、动态池和金库,并具备独特的 Bonding Curve 机制,具备更低的费用和更快的绑定时间。在 someting 平台上,代币流动性需要 42 枚 SOL 才能毕业,交易费用为 0.69%,支持自定义的债券曲线,具有防狙击功能并集成了市场做市商自动提供流动性,同时,为了提升项目的可信度,someting 还拥有 X 平台的验证徽章。

Launch Coin on Believe

Launch Coin on Believe 允许用户通过简单的社交互动来创建和发行新的代币,核心机制是通过回复带有 @launchacoin+代币名称的推文,从而触发一个新代币生成。

需要注意的是,Launch Coin on Believe 的前身是 PASTERNAK,是 Clout 创始人 Ben Pasternak 创建的名人币,Pasternak 也是 Monkey(Web2 中最大的社交应用之一)的创始人之一。Clout 是一个 SocialFi 平台,结合 Friend.Tech, Pump.fun 和 Moonshot 等平台特点,允许名人、创作者发行以自己名字命名的代币,曾获得了 Alliance DAO 等支持。

原文链接

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Monthly crypto payment card transaction volume has reached $15 billion, but the industry's development stage is comparable to debit cards in the 1990s, before they became a mainstream financial staple. A key limitation is the lack of established daily financial relationships, such as direct salary deposits and recurring bill payments, with crypto wallets. Despite annualized transaction volumes of approximately $18 billion, the market is concentrated and immature. The leading provider, RedotPay, commands over half the market share. User adoption is heavily skewed towards emerging markets like Bangladesh, India, and Nigeria, where access to USD and stable financial services is limited, rather than developed economies. The sector features four primary business models: 1) Card-issuing infrastructure providers, 2) Exchange-affiliated cards for user retention, 3) Decentralized wallet/DeFi cards with self-custody but high complexity, and 4) Stablecoin-focused digital banks, which dominate transaction volume by offering integrated financial services. The article argues that a pure payment functionality is insufficient for long-term success, mirroring the historical trajectory of traditional debit cards. Future winners will need to: 1) Control the upstream flow of funds, 2) Secure defensible niches in underserved markets, and 3) Most crucially, build core account relationships that integrate into users' daily financial lives. Without this evolution, crypto cards risk remaining niche prepaid tools rather than becoming universal financial infrastructure.

Foresight News5m ago

Crypto Payment Cards with $1.5 Billion Monthly Transaction Volume, Stuck in the 1990s

Foresight News5m ago

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

"7.8 Billion in Thefts Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become DeFi's Unavoidable 'Liquidity Tax'" A summary of Q2 2026 data reveals that security risks are now a fundamental capital cost in DeFi, directly impacting user returns and liquidity decisions. DeFiLlama recorded 88 hacking incidents with quantified losses totaling $780.3 million in Q2. April was the worst month with $644.8 million lost. DeFi protocol attacks accounted for $735.8 million, while cross-chain bridge exploits resulted in $354.4 million in losses (note: some event categorizations overlap). Cumulatively, DeFi hacks have reached $7.85 billion, with bridge losses at $3.26 billion. The quarter highlighted two primary risk categories: high-value infrastructure vulnerabilities (e.g., bridges, oracles, admin keys) causing massive single losses, and more frequent contract logic bugs. This signals a critical market shift: from post-incident analysis to preemptive pricing of risk. Users and liquidity providers now implicitly factor in the security of the entire asset pathway—not just pool APY—into their decisions. This hidden "risk premium" manifests through wider spreads, higher liquidity incentives, and capital migration towards perceived safer routes. Cross-chain bridge risks, responsible for over $353 million in Q2 losses, exemplify this change. Asset routing credibility is now part of the transaction. Following incidents like KelpDAO and THORChain, markets are demanding safer bridges, asset insurance, and clearer risk disclosure, increasing the cost of capital for riskier pathways. Consequently, security spending is transforming from a defensive cost into a core distribution cost for attracting liquidity. Protocols must invest more in audits, bug bounties, real-time monitoring, and insurance to remain competitive. Users are increasingly demanding transparency about fund flow paths, associated risks, and contingency plans. The key indicators for the industry's direction will be whether capital continues consolidating in trusted channels, if projects delay launches for enhanced audits, if insurance premiums rise, and if aggregators start displaying security risk metrics. Q2 2026 may be remembered not just as a bad period, but as the point when DeFi underwent a fundamental asset risk repricing, where security became a persistent,隐性 tax on all on-chain activity.

Foresight News34m ago

$7.8 Billion in Theft and Losses Reveals the Truth: Security Costs Have Become an Unavoidable Liquidity Tax for DeFi

Foresight News34m ago

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

BREAKING: Claude Sonnet 5, dubbed "Fennec," is now the default model for all Free and Pro users. This mid-tier model boasts the strongest Agent capabilities in the Sonnet line yet, with performance rivaling the flagship Opus 4.8. It features autonomous planning and can utilize browser and terminal tools—capabilities previously exclusive to costly, large models. Key benchmarks highlight significant gains over its predecessor, Sonnet 4.6, in reasoning, tool use, coding, and knowledge work. Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on SWE-bench Pro (surpassing GPT-5.5's 58.6%), 80.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 57.4% on Humanity's Last Exam (just 0.5% behind Opus 4.8). It even slightly outperforms Opus 4.8 in some knowledge tasks. Anthropic positions it as delivering ~90% of Opus's capability at a fraction of the cost. Pricing is aggressive: a limited-time promotional rate of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens (reverting to $3/$15 after August 31). This undercuts Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) and GPT-5.5 ($5/$30). However, a new tokenizer may increase token counts by 1.0-1.35x, affecting final costs post-promotion. Notably, Sonnet 5 excels in security, with a mere 0.93% browser injection attack success rate, outperforming Mythos 5 and Opus 4.8. Its prompt injection defense matches Opus 4.8 at 0.19%. Launching amid uncertainty around the region-restricted Fable 5, Sonnet 5 is globally available. It targets the mid-market, offering near-flagship performance at a competitive price, effectively lowering the barrier for multi-Agent development and presenting a compelling alternative for cost-conscious developers.

marsbit49m ago

Breaking News: The "Worker's Edition" Claude 5 Is Here, Everyone Can Use It

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy PUMP

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Pump.fun (PUMP) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Pump.fun (PUMP) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Pump.fun (PUMP)After purchasing your Pump.fun (PUMP), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Pump.fun (PUMP)Easily trade Pump.fun (PUMP) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy PUMP

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PUMP (PUMP) are presented below.

活动图片