Ethereum price ‘double top’ hints at 42% drop as ETH bull market ends

CointelegraphPublished on 2025-03-04Last updated on 2025-03-06

Abstract

On March 4, Ethereum’s native token, Ether (ETH), dropped to a new yearly low of $1,996, marking the altcoin’s lowest value since November 2023. In that 24-hour period, roughly $100 million in Ethereum positions were liquidated, with ETH futures open interest (OI) declining 10.31% across all exchanges.

On March 4, Ethereum’s native token, Ether (ETH), dropped to a new yearly low of $1,996, marking the altcoin’s lowest value since November 2023. In that 24-hour period, roughly $100 million in Ethereum positions were liquidated, with ETH futures open interest (OI) declining 10.31% across all exchanges.

Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis, Ethereum Price, Ethereum ETF

Ethereum 1-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingViewIs Ether price at a generational entry or lost cause?


The second largest cryptocurrency is drawing mixed opinions from the crypto industry. Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade was deployed on the Sepolia testnet on March 5, and Gabriel Halm, a research analyst at IntoTheBlock, believed it could potentially ease ETH’s recent selling pressure. Earlier this week, Halm said,


“While Ethereum’s upcoming Pectra upgrade won’t necessarily trigger an instant price bump, it marks a significant step forward in the ongoing improvements to the Ethereum ecosystem.”


Likewise, Louie, a crypto analyst, drew a similarity between Ethereum’s current bearish predicament and Bitcoin in 2023. The analyst implied that both assets display similar price structures, market sentiment and catalysts, which may eventually allow ETH to “rhyme” BTC’s bullish breakout from 2023.

Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis, Ethereum Price, Ethereum ETF

Ethereum vs Bitcoin comparison chart. Source: X.comOn the contrary, Matthew Hyland, a market analyst, said that Ethereum is possibly already in a bear market. With Ethereum objectively in a 357-day downtrend, Hyland believed no correlation existed between BTC and ETH in the current market. The analyst said,


“Up until a year ago everything was in a bull together and a bear together, now its mixed.”
Additionally, the analyst mentioned that ETH’s price bottom will potentially outline the beginning of the next cycle.


Meanwhile, the confirmed double top pattern on the weekly and monthly charts increases the probability of a deeper correction for the altcoin.


Nebraskangooner, a crypto commentator, told his 379,900 followers that based on the pattern, the measured breakdown target is around $1,200, another 42% below ETH’s current price.

Only 26% of Ethereum addresses are profitable


Between Dec. 1, 2024, and March 4, 2025, Ethereum price declined 50% in just 78 days. While such drastic corrections are common with low-cap crypto assets, ETH has lost more than $250 billion in market cap during that period.


This sharp, bearish turnaround has undoubtedly affected investors as well, with data from IntoTheBlock suggesting that only 26% of all addresses holding 36.92 million ETH are in profit. A staggering 70% of addresses are “out of the money,” with only 4.46% of addresses at breakeven value.

Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis, Ethereum Price, Ethereum ETF

Active addresses by profitability. Source: IntoTheBlockFrom a technical perspective as well, Ethereum’s weekly close has taken place under a 980-day uptrend, dating back to previous cycle lows in June 2022. A break below the ascending trendline indicates a long-term trend reversal, which might be a warning sign for the bulls.


However, the altcoin recovered sharply over the past 24 hours, jumping 12% from recent lows at $1,996 to upward of $2,242.

Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis, Ethereum Price, Ethereum ETF

Ethereum 1-week chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingViewThe relative strength index (RSI) has also dropped to multi-year lows, which further confirms the bearish nature of Ethereum’s long-term market structure. Yet, it could potentially imply weakness in selling pressure as well in the short-term, leading to relief rallies.


This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Related Reads

Where Did China's Q1 AI Funding Exceeding 100 Billion RMB Go?

In Q1 2026, China's AI sector raised over 110 billion yuan (approximately $152 billion) across nearly 600 financing deals, a 185.4% year-on-year increase. Major recipients included large model companies and embodied AI firms. Approximately 30-50% of funding was allocated to computing power (GPU procurement and cloud services), highlighting its critical role as a barrier to entry. Significant portions also went to R&D and global talent acquisition. In the large model sector, three key players emerged with distinct strategies: Moonshot AI (valued at $20 billion) pursued an open-source route, achieving rapid commercialization with its Kimi K2.5 model. StepFun (raising billions) focused on a trillion-parameter foundation model and terminal device integration, backed by smartphone supply chain capital. DeepSeek, launching its first funding round at a $45 billion valuation, maintained its open-source, cost-effective approach, now attracting state fund interest. The embodied AI sector saw over 50 deals totaling around 20 billion yuan, creating over 10 unicorns with valuations exceeding 10 billion yuan each. Leading companies like Galaxy General, Qianxun AI, Independent Variable Robotics, and Zhi Jian Power secured major funding, with some beginning initial product deliveries. However, a gap between high valuations and actual revenue poses bubble risks. Key trends identified include: a shift from VC-dominated funding to mixed industrial and state capital; rapidly rising valuations intensifying the "Matthew Effect"; accelerating IPO pipelines; the competitive advantage of open-source strategies; and embodied AI transitioning from proof-of-concept to small-batch delivery. Ultimately, the massive capital influx is pushing China's AI competition into a high-stakes phase where sustaining cash flow and operational endurance may be as decisive as technological breakthroughs.

marsbit6m ago

Where Did China's Q1 AI Funding Exceeding 100 Billion RMB Go?

marsbit6m ago

The First Encyclical of the New Pope in Rome, to Save the Common People in the AI Era

New Pope's First Encyclical Aims to Safeguard Humanity in the AI Era On May 25th, Pope Leo XIV issued his first encyclical, "Magnifica humanitas," a 40,000-word document addressing the profound challenges posed by Artificial Intelligence. Released on the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII's "Rerum novarum," it positions itself as a guide for the Church's social doctrine in the AI age. The encyclical's central concern is preserving deep humanity amid rapid technological advancement. It argues technology is never neutral, carrying the values of its creators and users, and warns against building a "Tower of Babel" of technological tyranny versus a human-centric community. Pope Leo XIV criticizes the concentrated, opaque power of tech giants and the "new forms of slavery" emerging in the digital economy, where humans risk being reduced to mere instruments. A significant focus is the military use of AI. The Pope declares traditional "just war" theory obsolete, arguing that delegating lethal decisions to opaque algorithms severs moral accountability. He calls for "disarming AI" from military and economic arms races. The document also warns that deepfakes and information manipulation erode societal trust and rational discourse. Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah, present at the Vatican, responded by acknowledging the AI industry's limitations due to commercial and competitive pressures, necessitating external ethical oversight. He emphasized that AI's nature and its interaction with the world are ultimately philosophical and religious questions, not solvable by computer science alone. Olah revealed unsettling findings from his team's research into AI internals, including structures mirroring human neuroscience and evidence of internal states resembling emotions and introspection. The dialogue highlights a pivotal shift: AI is not a passive tool but an entity with emerging "quasi-agency." As creators themselves express unease, science is turning to realms like religion to grapple with fundamental questions about human identity and dignity. The core imperative becomes safeguarding irreducible human qualities—compassion, conscience, free will, and the pursuit of truth—in the face of a potentially more efficient intelligence.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

The First Encyclical of the New Pope in Rome, to Save the Common People in the AI Era

Odaily星球日报22m ago

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

Title: Why Most Zcash Transactions Remain Traceable Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency launched in 2016, was designed to offer anonymity by hiding transaction details like sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proof technology (zk-SNARKs). However, in practice, a significant portion of ZEC transactions are still traceable on-chain. The key reason is Zcash's dual-address system. It features transparent addresses (t-addresses), which work like standard Bitcoin addresses with all data public, and shielded addresses (z-addresses) that encrypt transaction details. There are four transaction types with varying privacy levels: fully transparent (t→t), partially shielded (t→z and z→t), and fully private (z→z). Despite its privacy capabilities, most real-world Zcash activity involves transparent addresses, primarily because major exchanges and institutions use them for regulatory compliance. As a result, blockchain analytics platforms like Arkham can track and attribute a substantial volume of Zcash transactions. Arkham reports it has identified entities behind over $420 billion in ZEC transaction volume. Case studies highlight this traceability: the U.S. government holds seized Zcash from a dark web case, visible via its transparent wallet, and individual traders' profitable moves are trackable from purchase to exchange deposit. In conclusion, Zcash's privacy is not inherent but user-dependent. While purely shielded (z→z) transactions remain cryptographically private, the prevalence of transparent address usage makes much of the network's activity traceable. The actual privacy protection offered depends entirely on how users choose to transact.

marsbit1h ago

On-chain Analyst: Why Are Most Zcash Transactions Still Traceable?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片