Where Did China's Q1 AI Funding Exceeding 100 Billion RMB Go?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-26Last updated on 2026-05-26

Abstract

In Q1 2026, China's AI sector raised over 110 billion yuan (approximately $152 billion) across nearly 600 financing deals, a 185.4% year-on-year increase. Major recipients included large model companies and embodied AI firms. Approximately 30-50% of funding was allocated to computing power (GPU procurement and cloud services), highlighting its critical role as a barrier to entry. Significant portions also went to R&D and global talent acquisition. In the large model sector, three key players emerged with distinct strategies: Moonshot AI (valued at $20 billion) pursued an open-source route, achieving rapid commercialization with its Kimi K2.5 model. StepFun (raising billions) focused on a trillion-parameter foundation model and terminal device integration, backed by smartphone supply chain capital. DeepSeek, launching its first funding round at a $45 billion valuation, maintained its open-source, cost-effective approach, now attracting state fund interest. The embodied AI sector saw over 50 deals totaling around 20 billion yuan, creating over 10 unicorns with valuations exceeding 10 billion yuan each. Leading companies like Galaxy General, Qianxun AI, Independent Variable Robotics, and Zhi Jian Power secured major funding, with some beginning initial product deliveries. However, a gap between high valuations and actual revenue poses bubble risks. Key trends identified include: a shift from VC-dominated funding to mixed industrial and state capital; rapidly rising valuation...

Author: Omnitools

In May 2026, Moonshot AI was revealed to have reorganized its corporate structure back from B2B to B2C, with its head hospitalized due to high-intensity work and cost pressure. Almost simultaneously, the company completed a new funding round of approximately $2 billion, pushing its valuation past $20 billion. On one side is 'burning money until people can't take it anymore,' and on the other is capital queuing up to get in.

This is not an isolated case. Data from CCTV Finance shows nearly 600 funding rounds in China's AI sector in Q1 2026, with total funding exceeding 110 billion RMB, a sharp increase of 185.4% year-on-year. In May alone, Moonshot AI and StepFun, two large model companies, secured over 30 billion RMB. The embodied AI track was also hot, with over 50 disclosed funding rounds in Q1, accumulating about 20 billion RMB.

When single-quarter funding surpasses 100 billion RMB and the funding amounts for leading companies are dozens of times their annual revenue, what direction is this money pushing China's AI competition? OmniTools reviewed the domestic AI projects that received the most funding in Q1 2026 based on public financing data, attempting to answer three questions: Who is getting the money, what are they doing, and what do the trends behind this mean?

Where Did the Money Go? Nearly 600 Funding Rounds, Computing Power Consumes 30-50%

First, look at the macro picture. Citing data from venture capital institutions, CCTV Finance reported that the total funding in China's AI sector in Q1 2026 exceeded 110 billion RMB across nearly 600 funding events. What does 110 billion RMB represent? It's nearly triple the amount from the same period in 2025. Even in the history of global tech financing, this is a number worth noting.

The money mainly went to two tracks. Large model companies took the lion's share; in May alone, Moonshot AI and StepFun raised over 30 billion RMB. Embodied AI followed closely, with over 50 disclosed funding rounds in Q1, more than 30 companies receiving investment, totaling about 20 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of nearly 60%.

Where the money is going is more noteworthy. The CCTV Finance report clearly pointed out three major directions: R&D, computing power, and talent. Leading large model companies' R&D expenditures in 2025 generally reached tens of billions of RMB; GPU procurement and cloud service leasing accounted for 30% to 50% of the funding amounts; and attracting top global talent was the third major expenditure.

The fact that 30% to 50% is being poured into computing power is key to understanding this funding wave. It means that for every 1 billion RMB in funding, 300 to 500 million RMB directly becomes hardware and cloud service bills. This is not wastefulness, but rather the cost of admission at the current technological stage. Training a generation of large models requires clusters of tens of thousands of GPUs, and inference services require widely distributed computing nodes. These are not problems that can be solved with a light asset model. The essence of this funding is the rapid conversion of capital into hardware barriers.

At the same time, the figure of tens of billions in R&D investment needs to be viewed against a backdrop: most large model companies' revenues in 2025 were far below this level. The model of annual revenue in the billions and R&D investment in the tens of billions means that financing is the only lifeline sustaining competition.

Large Model Track: Three $10 Billion+ Players, Three Different Playbooks

Among the three large model companies that attracted the most attention in this funding wave are Moonshot AI, StepFun, and DeepSeek. Their commonality is that their valuations have already exceeded or are approaching $10 billion, but their approaches are distinctly different.

Moonshot AI: Open-Source Route Accelerates Commercialization

Moonshot AI has had the densest funding rhythm in the past six months. According to reports from Securities Times and Investment Community, from December 2025 to May 2026, Moonshot AI completed multiple funding rounds within half a year, accumulating over $3.9 billion (approximately 37.6 billion RMB). Its valuation soared from $4.3 billion to $20 billion. In half a year, the valuation multiplied nearly fivefold.

Supporting this valuation is the commercial performance following the release of Kimi K2.5. Investment Community cited data showing that revenue in the 20 days after K2.5's release exceeded that of the entire year 2025, and its global payment ranking rose from outside the top 100 to 9th place. This means Moonshot AI's commercialization is not just 'showing signs of life' but has experienced a turning point-level leap.

The open-source strategy of K2.5 is the key variable driving this turning point. The model became the only Chinese open-source model integrated into Cursor and the official main model for OpenClaw, directly penetrating the overseas developer ecosystem. Silicon Valley VC a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen evaluated it as 'basically replicating GPT-5-level reasoning capabilities.' Investor Chamath Palihapitiya called it the 'Kimi K2.5 moment'—the first time an open-source model truly shook the closed-source system.

StepFun: Trillion-Parameter Foundation Model, Betting on Edge Deployment

StepFun is taking a different path. In January 2026, the company completed a B+ round of over 5 billion RMB, setting a then-record for the largest single round in the large model track in 12 months. In May, another new round of nearly $2.5 billion in funding was nearing completion.

Unlike Moonshot AI's open-source route, StepFun emphasizes the parameter scale of its foundation model and edge deployment. Its trillion-parameter Step-2 model is positioned as an enterprise-grade foundation, with multimodal capabilities covering scenarios like visual understanding and video generation. On the product side, Step 3.5 Flash topped the OpenRouter fastest model chart on its release day.

More noteworthy is who is investing in StepFun. In the May funding round, smartphone industry chain companies like Huaqin, Longcheer, Omnivision, and ZTE collectively entered. This is no coincidence. Yin Qi, former co-founder of Megvii, has taken the role of Chairman at StepFun. The company has dismantled its VIE structure and is sprinting towards a Hong Kong IPO. The entry of smartphone industry chain capital means StepFun's strategy is not to be a pure software company, but to embed AI capabilities into edge devices, pursuing a 'model + hardware' integrated route.

DeepSeek: From No Funding to a $45 Billion Valuation

DeepSeek's first funding round was one of the most symbolic events of 2026. According to reports from Securities Times and Caijing, DeepSeek has initiated its first funding round, with its valuation soaring to $45 billion. It plans to raise over 50 billion RMB, with the Big Fund in talks to lead the investment.

Prior to this, DeepSeek had never conducted external financing. Founder Liang Wenfeng personally invested 20 billion RMB to support the company's operations. DeepSeek is known for its open-source models and extreme cost-effectiveness. Its technical approach has exerted significant downward pressure on API prices across the industry, pushing mainstream commercial models into the 'cent era'.

'Even companies that don't need money are starting to take it'—this signal is more important than any funding figure. It indicates that the intensity of the current AI competition has reached a critical point: even with technological and cost advantages, facing the industry-wide computing power arms race and talent war, not raising funds could lead to falling behind. The Big Fund's negotiations to lead the investment mean state capital is formally entering the core layer of large models. The $45 billion valuation corresponds to a company that has not yet scaled its commercialization, and the pressure to justify this valuation is self-evident.

Embodied AI: Over 10 Companies Valued at 10B+ RMB: Boom or Bubble?

Embodied AI was another main line of funding in Q1. Data from IT Juzi and Securities Times show over 50 disclosed funding rounds in this track in Q1, accumulating about 20 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of nearly 60%. Statistics from Guangzhou Daily show over 10 companies have already broken the 10 billion RMB valuation mark.

Galaxy General is the highest-valued project in this track. In March 2026, the company completed a 2.5 billion RMB funding round, with a valuation exceeding 20 billion RMB. Investors included Big Fund III, Sinopec, and CITIC. This was Big Fund III's first investment in the embodied AI field. Galaxy General's core products are general-purpose humanoid robots and the 'Galaxy Star Brain' embodied large model system. Its robots cooperate with CATL, achieving 7×24-hour fully autonomous operation in battery factories.

Qianxun Intelligence completed two consecutive rounds totaling nearly 2 billion RMB, reaching a valuation of over 10 billion RMB in 26 months since its founding, with participation from Yunfeng Capital, Chaos Investment, Sequoia Capital, etc. Qianxun's humanoid embodied intelligent production line has been deployed at CATL's Zhongzhou base.

Independent Variable Robotics completed a 1 billion RMB A++ round and a several hundred million RMB strategic round, with a valuation exceeding 10 billion RMB. It is the only embodied AI company simultaneously invested in by all three of China's internet giants: Alibaba, Meituan, and ByteDance. Founder Wang Qian is one of the earliest scholars globally to introduce the attention mechanism into neural networks. Independent Variable pursues a full-stack in-house R&D route for both software and hardware and has launched the 'Quantum One' and 'Quantum Two' humanoid robot bodies.

Zhi Jian Power is the most special project in this funding wave. The company was founded only in July 2025 and raised five rounds in 8 months, accumulating 2 billion RMB, with a valuation exceeding $1 billion, becoming the youngest embodied AI unicorn. Sequoia, Tencent, and Alibaba all participated in the investment. Achieving a valuation over $1 billion in less than a year is extremely rare in the hardware track.

Lingxin Qiaoshou focuses on a single category, achieving perfection. The company completed a nearly 1.5 billion RMB Series B round, with a valuation over 10 billion RMB. It is the world's only manufacturer producing a thousand high-degree-of-freedom dexterous hands per month, holding over 80% of the global market share. By becoming a global leader in a niche hardware category, Lingxin Qiaoshou's path differs from humanoid robot companies making complete machines; it's more like a 'hidden champion' in the embodied AI industry chain.

Vita Power and Luming Robot represent two directions: consumer-grade and industrial capital. Vita Power's Pre-A round raised nearly 500 million RMB, a record for the largest single round in the consumer-grade embodied AI track. The Vbot super-powered robotic dog has started initial deliveries of 500 units. Luming Robot accumulated nearly 1 billion RMB in funding, led by Mitsubishi Electric. The founder is a former senior executive from Dreame. Revenue in 2026 is expected to reach the hundred-million RMB level.

The embodied AI track is mass-producing 10-billion-RMB unicorns; that is a fact. However, very few companies have disclosed revenue. Unitree Technology's 2025 revenue was 1.708 billion RMB; Leju Robotics' revenue was 258 million RMB and applied for an IPO—leading companies indeed have real income. But most 10-billion-RMB valuation companies are still in the early validation stage. The chasm between valuation and revenue is the biggest uncertainty. When over ten companies simultaneously break the 10-billion-RMB valuation mark, the pressure of an industry valuation bubble cannot be ignored. The high expectations of capital ultimately need to be realized on client sites and production lines.

Behind the Ledger: Five Emerging Trends

Based on the above funding data and project review, OmniTools summarizes five emerging trends.

Trend 1: Capital structure is shifting from VC-led to a mix of industrial capital and state-backed funds. Big Fund III investing in Galaxy General, Big Fund negotiating to lead DeepSeek's first round, Mitsubishi Electric leading Luming Robot's round, smartphone industry chain capital investing in StepFun. Industrial capital brings orders and application scenarios; state-backed funds bring strategic intent. The proportion of purely financial investors is decreasing. For companies, this means that taking money is not just about delivering returns but also about being responsible for industrial implementation and compliance.

Trend 2: Valuation ceilings are rapidly rising, and the Matthew Effect is intensifying. Moonshot AI at $20 billion, DeepSeek at $45 billion, Galaxy General at 21 billion RMB—top companies are absorbing the majority of funds. Meanwhile, in the embodied AI track, over 30 companies received funding, but only about 10 raised over 1 billion RMB. As funds concentrate at the top, the risk of consolidation for mid-to-lower tier projects is rising.

Trend 3: IPO channels are accelerating. Leju Robotics' ChiNext IPO has been accepted, planning to raise 2.6 billion RMB, becoming the first AI company to apply the ChiNext's fourth set of listing standards. StepFun dismantled its VIE structure and is sprinting for a Hong Kong listing. Zhipu and MiniMax have also initiated listing processes. The high valuations in the primary market need the secondary market to take over; 2026 to 2027 may become a concentrated listing window for Chinese AI companies.

Trend 4: Open-source routes are gaining differentiated competitive advantages. Kimi K2.5 penetrated the overseas developer ecosystem through open source. DeepSeek's open-source strategy lowered prices across the industry. Open source is no longer a 'free strategy' but a means to gain global developer entry and build ecosystem barriers. For downstream clients, this means more cost-effective model options and continuously declining API costs.

Trend 5: Embodied AI is moving from proof-of-concept to small-batch delivery. Vita Power's Vbot delivering its first 500 units, Galaxy General's robots operating at CATL, Unitree shipping 5,500 humanoid robots in 2025. It's not all PowerPoint anymore; some products are already working at client sites. However, the journey from 'small-batch' to 'large-scale' involves challenges in supply chain, quality control, after-sales service, and cost control—each stage is difficult.

The 110 billion RMB in Q1 2026 funding is pushing China's AI competition into a new stage. The characteristic of this stage is no longer 'whose model has more parameters,' but 'whose money can last until the day commercialization is realized.' R&D investments in the tens of billions, computing power consuming 30-50%, the batch emergence of 10-billion-RMB valuations—these figures are proof of the industry's vitality but also signals of a high-intensity war of attrition. When the pace of fundraising becomes a core competitive advantage, and GPU reserves determine model iteration speed, the final outcome of this wave of AI entrepreneurship may not be decided by a single technological breakthrough, but by cash flow and management capabilities—who can stay at the table.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of the financing raised by top AI companies in China is typically spent on computing power, and what does this indicate?

AAccording to the article, 30% to 50% of the financing raised by top large model companies is allocated to computing power, specifically for GPU procurement and cloud services. This indicates that in the current technological stage, massive computing power has become a fundamental entry barrier and a key area of intense competition, transforming capital directly into hardware infrastructure.

QWhat are the different strategic approaches taken by the three major large model companies mentioned: Moonshot AI, StepFun, and DeepSeek?

AMoonshot AI follows an open-source strategy, which accelerated its global developer adoption and commercialization. StepFun focuses on building a large-scale trillion-parameter foundational model and embedding AI capabilities into terminal devices through partnerships with hardware manufacturers. DeepSeek, known for its cost-effective open-source models, maintained independence but has now initiated its first major funding round, indicating the intense pressure to keep up with the industry's computing power and talent race.

QWhat are the key trends identified in the financing landscape of China's AI sector for Q1 2026?

AThe article identifies five key trends: 1) A shift from VC-led financing to a mix of industrial capital and state-backed funds. 2) Rapidly rising valuation ceilings and intensifying Matthew Effect (concentration of capital in top companies). 3) An acceleration in the opening of IPO exit channels. 4) Open-source strategies becoming a source of differentiated competitiveness. 5) Embodied AI transitioning from proof-of-concept to small-batch delivery in real-world scenarios.

QDespite high valuations, what is the primary concern regarding many companies in the embodied AI (robotics) sector?

AThe primary concern is the significant gap between their high valuations (with over 10 companies valued over 10 billion RMB) and their actual disclosed revenue. Most are still in early validation stages, creating potential valuation bubbles. The pressure lies in converting capital expectations into real-world, large-scale commercial deployment with proven revenue.

QWhat is the fundamental nature of the competition in China's AI sector as suggested by the conclusion of the article?

AThe article concludes that the competition has entered a stage defined by a high-intensity war of attrition. The outcome may not be determined by a single technological breakthrough, but rather by which companies have sufficient financial resources (cash flow) and operational management capabilities to sustain themselves until their business models achieve large-scale commercial success. Financing pace and GPU reserves have become core competitive factors.

Related Reads

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit31m ago

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit31m ago

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手33m ago

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手33m ago

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit57m ago

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit57m ago

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

AI Agents Are Redefining Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the 2026 Agentic Paradigm The recent controversy in Rugpull Bakery, a competitive baking game on Abstract chain, highlighted a pivotal shift. Player complaints about unfair bot automation in Season 2 led developers to not ban them, but instead formally integrate AI agents as core gameplay in Season 3, providing official guides (skill.md, agent.json). This move signals Web3 gaming's transition into the "Agentic Gaming" era, where AI agents are sovereign entities with independent strategy and economic rights, moving beyond simple automation. By 2026, AI agent integration has evolved into three core models reshaping the ecosystem: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** Agents act as independent players. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker-playing agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data, and Somnia's "Agentic L1" blockchain providing native infrastructure for millions of autonomous agents. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** Games like EVE Frontier enable "server-side modding," allowing AI agents to program game world logic directly into structures like smart storage, turrets, and stargates via Smart Assemblies. Coupled with standards like ERC-8183, which enables autonomous job creation and payment between agents, in-game infrastructure gains a "commercial soul." 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptive Worlds:** This model focuses on human-AI collaboration. In Parallel Colony, players guide highly autonomous AI Avatars with unique personalities and goals. Illuvium plans to use AI to transform NPCs into dynamic, context-aware entities that create personalized, emergent narratives. The conclusion is clear: blocking automation is futile. The future lies in leveraging blockchain's transparency and programmability to empower AI agents as first-class citizens. Web3 gaming is shifting from inefficient human labor to efficient algorithmic interplay and emergent intelligence, creating a "post-human" digital frontier where players become commanders and symbiotic partners in a new socioeconomic experiment.

marsbit57m ago

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片