解读AAVE回购提案,终于开启DeFi分红了?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-03-05Last updated on 2025-03-05

Abstract

「乱世」新蓝筹

3 月 4 日,Aave DAO 服务提供商 Marc Zeller 发布治理提案,寻求治理批准,正式名称为 Aave Request for Final Comments (ARFC),旨在重塑 Aave 的经济模型。它并不是对现有机制的简单调整,而是一次根本性的升级,涉及 收入分配、激励机制,以及长期稳定性的优化。

提案目前只发布了第一部分,目前处于意见征集阶段,而 AAVE 代币自提案发布以来最高上涨至 216 美元,目前 AAVE 价格为 215 美元, 24 小时上涨 15.5% 。

解读AAVE回购提案,终于开启DeFi分红了?

提案内容解读

Marc Zeller 在 X 上直言,这是「Aave 史上最重要的提案」,可见其影响力之大。提案的核心支柱包括:

1、收入再分配机制

2、AAVE 代币回购与分发计划

3、Umbrella 安全机制

4、LEND 代币退役

解读AAVE回购提案,终于开启DeFi分红了?

根据提案内容,Aave 在过去两年持续扩展市场版图,构建了稳固的财务基础。

尽管市场环境波动,Aave 仍然保持强劲的收入增长,其 DeFi 协议的流动储备增长 115% ,达到 1.15 亿美元。稳健的财务状况使 Aave 能够在保持竞争力的同时推进代币经济学升级。

成立 Aave 财务委员会

提案的核心之一是成立 Aave Finance Committee(AFC),该委员会将作为 Aave 治理框架下的一个重要实体,全面负责管理 Aave 的资金库和流动性策略。AFC 的成立标志着 Aave 在财务管理方面迈向了更加专业化和透明化的道路。

AFC 的主要职责包括负责监督 Aave 生态系统内的所有财务分配,确保资金得到合理、高效的使用,并实现收入的可持续增长。此外还要制定并执行 Aave 的流动性策略,以确保协议在各种市场条件下都能保持充足的流动性。最重要的是 AFC 将负责评估和管理 Aave 协议面临的各种财务风险,包括市场风险、信用风险和操作风险。

为了确保 AFC 的专业性和有效性,委员会将由包括 Chaos Labs、TokenLogic、Llamarisk 和 ACI 在内的核心利益相关方参与支持。这些机构在 DeFi 领域拥有丰富的经验和专业知识,将为 AFC 的决策提供有力支持。

利好质押者,Aave 的收入分红机制

本次提案中最受瞩目的内容莫过于协议收入分配机制的重大调整,Aave 计划将协议产生的部分收入分配给 stkAAVE 质押者,更直接地将协议的成功与 AAVE 代币持有者的利益挂钩。

具体而言,Aave 计划引入「手续费开关」(Fee Switch)机制。这一机制将允许 Aave 将协议产生的多余收入(例如借贷手续费)从国库中释放出来,重新分配给 AAVE 质押者和用户,而不是简单地将这些收入积累在国库中。

为了进一步优化激励机制,并增强 GHO 稳定币的吸引力,Aave 还计划推出 Anti-GHO 作为 GHO 的新激励机制,以取代现有的折扣模式。Anti-GHO 是一种不可转让的 ERC 20 代币,其发行量将直接与 GHO 产生的收入挂钩。

在 GHO 上线之初,Aave 即借助 Merit 计划测试了基于稳定费收入的分红激励,年分配规模一度达 1200 万美元。如今,该计划已实现自给自足,不再需要额外稳定币资金支持。该机制将收入和激励挂钩,不仅增强 AAVE 质押收益,还避免了单纯的费率折扣在牛熊转换周期里出现「动力不足」的缺陷。

具体分配机制如下:

1、GHO 费用生成 Anti-GHO: 50% 的 GHO 费用将被用于生成不可转让的 Anti-GHO 代币。

2、生成的 Anti-GHO 代币将按照以下比例进行分配: 80% 分配给 StkAAVE 持有者(AAVE 质押者), 20% 分配给 StkBPT 持有者(Balancer 池质押者)。

3、原有的 GHO 手续费折扣将被取消,取而代之的是基于协议收益的利润分配。

Anti-GHO 持有者有两种使用方式:

1、 1: 1 燃烧抵消 GHO 债务: 持有者可以按照 1: 1 的比例燃烧 Anti-GHO 来抵消其 GHO 债务。

2、转换为 StkGHO: 持有者也可以选择将 Anti-GHO 转换为 StkGHO,从而获得 GHO 的质押收益。

不过 Anti-GHO 的实施仍需额外开发和审计,或将在后续的「Aavenomics Part Two」提案中正式启用。

开启回购

除了收入分配,Aave 还计划启动一项雄心勃勃的 AAVE 代币回购计划。在未来六个月内,Aave 将每周投入 100 万美元用于回购 AAVE 代币,这项计划将由新成立的 Aave Finance Committee (AFC) 负责监督和执行。

AFC 可以直接执行回购,也可以与做市商合作,从二级市场购入 AAVE。回购的代币将被分配至 Aave 的生态储备,用于支持生态系统的长期发展。

作为 Aave DAO 的财务服务提供商,TokenLogic 将根据协议的整体预算规划回购策略,其目标是最终覆盖并超越 Aave 生态系统内所有与 AAVE 相关的支出,同时保持谨慎的资金管理。

随着 2025 年 Aave 新收入来源的拓展,AFC 可能会提议提高回购预算。TokenLogic 将根据 Aave 资金库的资产配置情况,按月调整资金来源和策略。

提升协议运行安全及效率

为了进一步提升协议的安全性并提高资本效率,Aave 计划推出「Umbrella」机制。Umbrella 将整合质押和流动性管理,以有效防范坏账风险和流动性危机。这被视为对现有安全模块(Safety Module)的重大升级。

Umbrella 机制的主要优势包括:

1、强大的坏账保护: Umbrella 将为 Aave 提供强大的坏账保护机制,增强其在市场波动和潜在风险面前的抗风险能力,尤其是在 DeFi 领域频繁遭遇黑客攻击的背景下。

2、吸引机构级用户: Umbrella 的机构级风险管理能力将有助于吸引更多机构级用户参与 Aave 生态,提升协议在链上资产管理方面的安全性。

3、跨链部署: Umbrella 系统将跨 Ethereum、Avalanche、Arbitrum、Base 等多个区块链网络进行部署,实现更广泛的适用性和更高的安全性。

此外,Anti-GHO 机制也将整合到 Umbrella 中,这将使得 GHO 债务的偿还或转换为可生息的 StkGHO 变得更加简单和便捷。Aave 目前每年面临 2700 万美元的流动性成本,Umbrella 机制的推出将有效提升资本效率。

最后,提案还计划彻底完成 LEND 代币的退役。LEND 是 Aave 在 2020 年升级为 AAVE 之前的原始治理代币。自 2020 年以来,LEND 代币一直处于向 AAVE 迁移的过渡期。

此次提案计划通过冻结 LEND 迁移合约,彻底终结 LEND 代币,并回收 32 万枚未兑换的 AAVE 代币(当前价值约 6500 万美元)。提案指出,社区已经有充足的时间完成代币转换,因此建议正式关闭迁移流程。回收的资金将由 Aave 治理决定具体用途,例如用于生态增长、安全升级或代币销毁。

这一举措将有助于清理 Aave 治理的历史遗留问题,提高协议的运作效率。同时,释放这些未被充分利用的资金,也将进一步增强 Aave 的财务实力,为其未来的发展提供更充足的资源。

乱世新蓝筹?社区怎么看这份提案

目前,该提案仍处于 ARFC(意见征集阶段),社区可在 Aave 治理论坛 进行讨论。提案的下一步将是收集社区反馈,并争取达成共识后进入 Snapshot 线下投票。如果获得通过,提案将正式进入 链上治理提案(AIP),若顺利执行,回购等计划将于 2025 年启动。

社区成员通过这份投案综合计算 AAVE 持有者有望获得约 3% 的年化收益。尽管从绝对数值来看,这一收益率似乎并不突出,但 Aave 已经确立了其在整个 DeFi 生态中的核心地位,凭借其稳健的运营、持续的增长和清晰的收益模式,展现出类似传统金融市场中优质蓝筹股的特质,吸引了越来越多理性投资者的关注。

在经济下行周期,这类资产通常具有较强的防御性,能够为投资者提供相对稳定的回报和安心的持有体验。尤其值得关注的是,随着全球监管环境对 DeFi 领域的逐步放松和认可,DeFi 资产的价值存在被重新评估的可能性。因此,将 Aave 重新定义为加密货币市场新秩序下的「蓝筹」资产,具备充分的合理性和前瞻性。它不仅代表了一种稳健的投资策略,也预示着 DeFi 领域未来发展的某种趋势。

另外,白宫 AI 与加密货币主管 David Sacks 表示将可能撤销所谓的「DeFi 经纪人规则」——这是拜登政府在最后时刻对加密社区的攻击。

DeFi 经纪人规则是针对去中心化金融(DeFi)中介服务提供者(如交易平台、借贷协议等)的监管框架,旨在确保合规性、用户保护和风险管理。核心内容包括反洗钱(AML)、用户身份验证(KYC)、智能合约审计、资金安全以及透明度要求。

取消 DeFi Broker Rule 意味着不要求 DeFi 协议上报和披露客户信息,算是减轻了 DeFi 的监管压力,这对 Aave 来说也算一种利好。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

Anthropic has publicly detailed its security measures and a new "Cyber Jailbreak Severity" (CJS) framework following the controversial takedown of its Fable 5 model. The incident, triggered by simple user requests like counting letters or stating a profession, highlighted overzealous safety filters. Anthropic classifies cybersecurity-related prompts into four tiers: malicious activities (blocked), high-risk dual-use (like pentesting, with strict limits), low-risk dual-use (often blocked by "safety margin" errors), and harmless tasks (theoretically allowed but still frequently flagged). The company admits its classifiers are tuned for high sensitivity, leading to many false positives. The newly proposed CJS framework aims to objectively score the severity of AI "jailbreaks" (prompts that bypass safety rules) on a 0-10 scale across four dimensions: Capability Gain (does it grant new attack abilities?), Breadth (does it work across multiple attack types?), Weaponization Ease (how hard is it to turn into a real attack?), and Discoverability (how easy is it to find?). The score determines the response, from no action (CJS-0) to a potential model takedown (CJS-4). The score is context-dependent; for example, discovering a major unknown vulnerability today scores high, while asking about a well-known one scores low. The article raises concerns about Anthropic's dual role: it is both creating powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) and defining the rules (CJS) for judging their misuse, potentially giving it disproportionate influence. This is set against the backdrop of U.S. export controls, which for the first time directly restricted API access to a model (Fable 5), creating a "tiered" system where public models are heavily filtered and advanced ones are limited to vetted partners. The CJS framework is portrayed as potentially providing regulators with a metric to justify future API shutdowns. For users, the advice is to carefully phrase prompts, watch for signs of being downgraded to a weaker model, and wait indefinitely for promised filter improvements.

marsbit24m ago

Anthropic Creates an AI Jailbreak 'Penal Code': Your Requests, Four Ways to Die

marsbit24m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

Arena, the AI model ranking platform, has become a $100 million annual revenue business just eight months after launching its commercial service. Originally a UC Berkeley open-source research project called Chatbot Arena, it created a "battle arena" where users blind-test and vote on anonymous AI model responses. This has generated a highly trusted, community-driven leaderboard based on over 10 million user evaluations and 82 million votes. Major AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic submit their flagship models to be ranked. The core monetization strategy is its AI Evaluations service, where model developers and large enterprises pay for in-depth performance analysis from Arena's massive user community. This provides real-world feedback on model strengths, weaknesses, and hallucinations—a critical service as models become more complex. The company, spun out from Berkeley in early 2025, quickly raised $100 million in seed funding at a $600 million valuation and later secured a $150 million Series A at a $1.7 billion valuation. The founding team includes CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos, a mathematician focused on rigorous model evaluation; CTO Wei-Lin Chiang, creator of the popular Vicuna chatbot; and co-founder Ion Stoica, a renowned Berkeley professor. Arena is now expanding beyond chat benchmarks into "Agent Mode," evaluating AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks like coding and research. The company's success illustrates the growing value and cost of independent, real-world AI model evaluation as the industry intensifies.

marsbit29m ago

$100M Annual Revenue, Two Berkeley Roommates in Their 20s Build the Most Profitable AI Business

marsbit29m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

Vercel, known for its developer tools like Next.js, has launched 'skills', a package manager for AI coding agents, garnering 24,000 GitHub stars. It allows developers to add specialized capabilities, such as React best practices, to AI assistants like Claude Code or Cursor with a single command: `npx skills add <package>`. Skills are shareable, reusable modules that define an AI agent's behavior for specific tasks, moving beyond one-off prompt engineering towards standardized 'capability engineering'. A key innovation is the 'find-skills' skill, which acts as an internal search engine, allowing an agent to autonomously find and install the right skill for a user's request. This lowers the barrier for non-developers to leverage advanced AI coding assistance. However, this 'npm moment' for AI brings significant security risks. Security audits of thousands of skills on platforms like skills.sh and ClawHub found over 30% contained security flaws, with about 13% classified as severe. Threats include malicious scripts that can access local files and credentials, and prompt injection hidden within skill documentation. Unlike traditional code packages, skills blend instructions, code, and system access, posing a direct risk to user machines and data. Experts advise treating skills like code—reviewing them carefully before installation, especially their scripts, and being wary of excessive permissions. Ultimately, Vercel's initiative represents a major shift towards modular, reusable AI capabilities, but its rapid adoption requires developers to bring the same caution used in managing traditional software dependencies.

marsbit30m ago

Racking Up 24,000 Stars: With One Command, AI Can Now Find Its Own Skills

marsbit30m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

This article, titled "Claude Engineer Finally Releases Fable 5 'Skill-Burning' Guide, Teaching How to Bridge the Information Gap with Models," details a blog post by Claude Code engineer Thariq Shihipar. The core concept is the "information gap" or "unknowns"—the disconnect between a user's instructions (the "map") and the actual task requirements (the "territory"). The article argues that with powerful models like Claude Fable 5, work quality depends on the user's ability to identify and clarify these unknowns. Shihipar categorizes unknowns into four types: Known Knowns (explicit instructions), Known Unknowns (awareness of gaps), Unknown Knowns (implicit, unstated knowledge), and Unknown Unknowns (unforeseen issues). The blog provides a framework for addressing these gaps throughout the workflow: * **Before Implementation:** Techniques include "Blindspot Scanning" to uncover Unknown Unknowns, brainstorming/prototyping for visual or complex tasks, having Claude ask clarifying questions, using reference code/examples, and creating implementation plans. * **During Implementation:** Maintaining an "implementation notes" file for Claude to document deviations and decisions made due to encountered edge cases. * **After Implementation:** Creating summary documents for review and having Claude generate quizzes to ensure the user fully understands the completed changes. The article concludes that as models become more capable, the key to success is systematically discovering and defining these unknowns through low-cost methods like prototyping and planning, allowing for more effective collaboration.

marsbit34m ago

Claude Engineer Finally Unveils Fable 5's Ultimate Strategy, Teaching You How to Bridge the Information Gap with AI Models

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy AAVE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Aave Protocol (AAVE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Aave Protocol (AAVE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Aave Protocol (AAVE)After purchasing your Aave Protocol (AAVE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Aave Protocol (AAVE)Easily trade Aave Protocol (AAVE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy AAVE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AAVE (AAVE) are presented below.

活动图片