Pump.Fun’s Founder Sparks User Protection Debate, Urges Memecoin Launchpads To Develop Better Practices

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-02-19Last updated on 2025-02-19

Abstract

The ongoing LIBRA token scandal has taken the crypto industry by storm, sparking several debates regarding user protection, the market’s...

The ongoing LIBRA token scandal has taken the crypto industry by storm, sparking several debates regarding user protection, the market’s state, and bad actors taking advantage of the cycle’s memecoin frenzy. Pump.fun’s founder joined the discussion and urged token launchpads to work on practices to improve the space.

Libra Token Scandal Shakes Memecoin Sector

On Monday, Alon Cohen, Pump.Fun’s founder took X to discuss the current state of the memecoin sector following the recent “Libragate” controversy. Cohen expressed disgust over the events that “transpired over the past days surrounding LIBRA,” as the people responsible for the project took advantage of many users, the ecosystem, “and even an entire country.”

memecoin

Pump.fun's founder weighs in on the Libra token controversy. Source: Alon on X

The “Viva La Libertad” Project and its token, LIBRA, was launched on Friday and quickly gained attention after Argentina’s President Javier Milei endorsed it in a now-deleted post. The project allegedly aimed to “encourage Argentina’s economic growth by funding small businesses and startups,” reaching a market capitalization of over $4.5 billion in less than an hour.

However, the project’s team wallets and insiders started to cash out, selling over $100 million and crashing the token’s valuation by over 90% in a few hours. Since then, President Milei has distanced himself from the project and stated in an interview that he “didn’t promote it” but “spread it.”

Cohen considers that the incident has significantly hurt the memecoin space, “especially as Pump.fun was built to explicitly tackle some of the issues that have been exposed” this weekend.

He criticized the need for a middlemen-like development team and market makers’ involvement, noting that a memecoin “should be stupidly simple that anyone can do it” and suggesting the existence of these actors enables anyone to be taken advantage of easily.

When we created pump fun, from the very start, it set out to standardize, automate, and democratize coin creation to build in a baseline level of safety, simplicity, and fairness for every launch.

Better User Protection Required

The Pump.fun’s founder noted the growing aversion towards memecoins but pointed out that “the same core user behaviors that you’re seeing in the memecoin space have existed before” in other sectors, including NFTs and DeFi.

memecoin

Cohen defends the memecoin sector. Source: Alon on X

He suggested that memecoin platforms like the Solana-based launchpad should provide guardrails that ensure users are as safe as possible and meet their demands simultaneously. He listed three actions that could help achieve better user protection.

First, Cohen considers educating users on safely and ethically creating tokens is important. According to the post, there’s a lack of education on what a memecoin creator does after launching the token, how to set expectations, how much of the supply to buy and when to take profit, or what to do about snipers.

Second, he suggested that onboarding needs to be friendlier for new traders, noting that the ecosystem should onboard new users in a way that “is suited to the user’s trading experience,” as just promoting advanced trading tools is “simply irresponsible.”

Lastly, Pump.fun’s founder believes that user protection must be taken more seriously “on an interface level.” To him, interfaces can create a safer environment, reduce the visibility of tokens that display suspicious activity, set reasonable slippage settings, and more to “make this space great again.”

Cohen’s post sparked a discussion about what memecoin launchpads do to protect users. Some community members considered the thread to be somewhat hypocritical based on Pump.fun’s previous controversies.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the Solana-based platform faced heavy criticism in November 2024 after users exploited the launchpad’s now-unavailable Livestreaming feature to promote tokens based on controversial and potentially harmful prompts.

Others called the platform a “rug pull factory” that offers “scam coins and extract fees,” with one user stating that Cohen’s launchpad has “extracted more money out of Solana than anything else by a longshot.”

 Meanwhile, a Pump.fun user pointed out the importance of guardrails as several tokens have disguised malicious links in the platform as the project’s information pages.

The extent of the Libra token’s repercussions is yet to be seen, but it has put the spotlight on users’ growing exhaustion about the continuous bad practices of malicious actors trying to benefit from crypto investors.

Solana, sol, solusdt, memecoin

Solana (SOL) trades at $169.25 in the one-week chart. Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Rubmar Garcia

Rubmar Garcia

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Related Reads

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

When Futu Becomes a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Status as the New Hard Currency for China's Middle Class Following a severe penalty announcement from Chinese regulators on May 22nd targeting offshore brokerages like Futu, its app community unexpectedly transformed into an impromptu matchmaking platform. Users posted相亲 (matchmaking) requests, explicitly seeking partners with overseas residency or citizenship, revealing a stark new reality: for China's middle class, an overseas identity has become a crucial asset. The regulatory crackdown, which restricts mainland Chinese residents from opening new accounts to buy overseas securities like US stocks, has sharply escalated the value of a foreign passport or permanent residency. This status now acts as a gateway to global asset allocation—including US equities, offshore property, and foreign currency deposits—effectively becoming a new form of "hard currency." Its scarcity, non-transferability (except through marriage, inheritance, etc.), and role as a hedge against domestic uncertainty have driven its premium. The article traces the evolution of how China's middle class views overseas resources: from an investment for opportunity (2000s), to risk diversification (2010s), and now to a mandatory "insurance policy" for financial access. With the regulatory window closing for many, the demand is shifting towards securing such status for the next generation through international education. The surreal scene of high-performing investors posting dating resumes underscores a 2026 where financial talent can be secondary to the right passport.

marsbit5m ago

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

marsbit5m ago

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

**Title**: Understanding Bound: The Escape Mechanism of "Multi-Sig + Time Lock" and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box **Summary**: Bound Exchange, evolved from the earlier radFi platform, introduces a novel approach to Bitcoin trading by combining self-custody security with exchange-like speed. Its core mechanism relies on a 2-of-2 multi-signature (multi-sig) address for user deposits. One private key is held by the user via a passkey, and the other is held by Bound. This setup requires both keys to sign any transaction, preventing Bound from unilaterally accessing user funds (non-custodial). To address the risk of Bound becoming unavailable, a 3-month timelock is integrated into the Bitcoin script. After this period, users can withdraw their assets with just their single signature, ensuring an escape hatch. For trading, Bound operates a concentrated liquidity AMM. However, as Bitcoin L1 lacks smart contracts, the AMM curve, liquidity management, and trade price calculations occur off-chain in Bound's backend database. On-chain Bitcoin transactions serve only as final settlement receipts for pre-determined amounts. This creates a centralization point: the critical sequence of trade execution—which determines the exact price along the curve for each order—is managed off-chain by Bound in a non-transparent "black box." While the 2-of-2 setup protects user本金 (principal), the pricing and ordering of trades introduce potential operational MEV risks, as the order processing is invisible and unverifiable on-chain. In practice, users can also connect external wallets (like Unisat) for fully self-custodied trading, but this requires manually signing every transaction. The platform currently supports deposits of BTC and Runes only.

marsbit10m ago

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

marsbit10m ago

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

The article argues that Hyperliquid's competitive edge lies not in technological superiority but in its 24/7 trading model, which fundamentally challenges traditional finance's fixed market hours. Based in Singapore with an 11-person team, Hyperliquid has generated significant revenue and trading volume. Its core advantage is the ability to facilitate trading continuously, including during weekends when major exchanges like the CME are closed. This was demonstrated when Hyperliquid listed a SpaceX pre-IPO perpetual contract on a Sunday, allowing the market to price the company hours before traditional institutions opened. This disruption has drawn regulatory scrutiny from traditional giants like CME and ICE, who cite risks like lack of KYC and market manipulation. However, the article suggests their concern stems from Hyperliquid eroding the "time monopoly" of established markets. The piece contrasts Hyperliquid's synthetic derivatives—pure price-betting contracts with no underlying asset or centralized issuer—with other models like PreStocks (dependent on real股权) and Ondo (licensed but targetable). Hyperliquid's code-based, decentralized structure makes it resilient to takedowns, even if founders face legal action. Ultimately, the author concludes that while it raises legitimate regulatory questions, Hyperliquid's "unforgeable" competitive barrier is the time advantage of non-stop trading, a feature legacy systems cannot replicate.

marsbit16m ago

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

marsbit16m ago

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

"The New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Infiltrate Investment Signals In late February 2026, nine linked anonymous wallets on Polymarket placed over 80 bets on specific details of a US-Iran war, winning over $2.4 million with a 98% win rate. This exemplifies 'information laundering'—a destructive flaw inherent to prediction markets. These markets function by aggregating trader supply and demand on an order book to set prices, which represent collective probability estimates. This makes them valuable real-time sentiment indicators for institutions. However, the system cannot distinguish between public information and stolen secrets. Confidential information enters one end, and 'clean' market prices—bearing no trace of their illicit origin—emerge from the other. For example, an insider knowing of an imminent strike can buy contracts at low odds, pushing the price up and disguising the secret as a savvy market signal, then profit massively when the event occurs. Analysts can sometimes uncover these schemes due to the blockchain's transparency, as seen with Bubblemaps. Paradoxically, this same transparency can inadvertently broadcast secrets to adversarial observers, providing them with low-cost intelligence. Current laws, like insider trading regulations focused on corporate information, fail to address this issue, especially concerning events like military actions with no 'issuer.' Jurisdictional challenges are amplified as platforms operate offshore, easily bypassing national bans with VPNs. Recent US congressional investigations and proposed bills aim to ban war betting and trading on non-public information by officials. The core issue is that information laundering is not a bug but a feature: a market that perfectly converts knowledge into price will inherently reward those with the best information, including those who obtained it illicitly. As prediction markets grow, potentially reaching hundreds of billions in volume, society must confront whether it can tolerate a machine that profitably transforms its most guarded secrets into public, tradable numbers."

链捕手25m ago

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

链捕手25m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片