牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-12-17Last updated on 2024-12-17

Abstract

本文将介绍 12 个周期判定工具和退出指标,多个指标显示,本轮牛市周期尚未见顶。

原文作者:Ostium, 加密分析师


一文编译:Felix, PANews


本文将介绍 12 个周期判定工具和退出指标,其中大多数都鲜为人知。以下为内容详情:


PI 周期

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


PI 周期顶部指标已成功捕捉到前三个周期顶部。该指标使用 111 天移动平均线(dMA)和 2 倍的 350 dMA 价格。在过去的三个周期中,当 111 dMA 突破 2 倍的 350 dMA 时,标志着 BTC/USD 周期的顶部。之所以将其称为 PI 周期顶部,是因为 350/111 = 3.153 ,与 3.142 相差不远。


预计这次可能有所不同,因为预期的交叉价位将超 40 万美元(难以实现),但可以期待在比特币达到 2 倍的 350 dMA 的价位后(目前约为 12.6 万美元)会出现最后的兴奋阶段。


MVRV Z Score

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


之前强调过的另一个链上指标是 MVRV Z-Score,它是评估极端泡沫时期的工具。MVRV Z-Score 能够帮助识别比特币相对于公允价值可能被高估或低估到极端程度的位置。


该指标采用比特币的市场价值(价格 x 流通供应量)和实际价值(每个比特币最后一次移动的平均价格 x 流通供应量),并计算它们之间的 Z-Score,识别极端值。


从历史上看,BTC/USD 在该比率达到峰值后的几周内形成了周期高点。预计这轮周期该指标至少会达到 4 ;如果高于这个水平,就可以开始着手研究其他退出指标了。


这个指标的一个更有趣的版本鲜为人知,是鲸鱼 MVRV(持有 1000 到 1 万 BTC),见下图:

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


数据来源

VAPLI 和 Decay Oscillator


Volatility Adjusted Power Law Index(VAPLI)指标建立在幂律概念的基础上,用来衡量比特币价格与拟合幂律曲线的偏差,并根据波动率进行调整,以考虑市场结构随时间的变化。查看下面的图表,可以看到该指数推向 100 然后转向并开始下降的时期与周期顶部是一致的。目前这个数字又一次突破了 100 。

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


数据来源

与波动率调整幂律类似,下面的幂律衰减通道振荡(Decay Oscillator)由 Sminston With 建模。该振荡的峰值在几天内几乎锁定了前几个周期的顶部,但显然没有办法真正实时确定将在哪里达到峰值:但是当该指标达到 90% 以上,然后查看其他退出信号,接近您想要退出位置的可能性达 95% 。目前该指标仍低于 60% ,表明这个市场周期仍处于上涨阶段:

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


Mayer Multiple


Mayer Multiple 是价格交易时 200 dMA 的倍数。虽然上面的图表很有帮助,但考虑到波动性随时间推移而降低,将其标准化实际上更有帮助。下图为调整后的 Mayer Multiple 指标。目前远未达到相对于 200 dMA 的历史高点,事实上,甚至还没有回到 2024 年 3 月的高点。期待着超越 2024 年 3 月的高点,朝着 0.9 区域迈进:

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


数据来源

NUPL
NUPL,即净未实现利润/亏损,使用市场价值和已实现价值(如上文 MVRV Z Score 部分中所强调的),从市场价值中减去已实现价值。然后除以市值,公式为:(市值 - 已实现市值)/市值。

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


该图表可以直观地了解市场情绪以及目前可能处于的市场周期阶段。从历史上看,当接近或超过 75% 时,周期顶部就不远了。


Terminal Price
Terminal Price 是分析师 Checkmate 创建的工具。要计算该指标,需要将销毁比特币天数除以现有的比特币供应量和它的流通时间。这被视为是“转让价格”,转让价格乘以 21 。
使用方式很简单,就是作为一个参考区域,希望确保头寸是按比例调整的——现在它的价格是 18 万美元。这并不意味着要等到 18 万美元才退出任何长期敞口,而是与所有其他退出指标结合使用。在寻找退出信号时,需要更加重视已经讨论过的其他链上指标。

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


4 年 MA 倍数
4 年 MA 倍数非常简单:绘制 4 年移动平均线并计算价格偏离该倍数的程度。从历史上看,峰值超过 4 年 MA 的 4.5 倍,但当该倍数接近 4 时,需要开始关注所有其他退出指标:

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


22 天 RSI
22 天 RSI 指标非常有用,当然也可以使用 2 周或每月 RSI,但 22 天对于主要波动点来说尤其清晰。事实上,每次 22 天 RSI 达到 90 以上的峰值时,周期峰值都会在随后的 22 天内形成(不包括 11 月 21 日的高点)。
可以参考 BTC 的 22 天 RSI,当该指标高于 90 ,可以在随后的 3-6 周内退出仓位:

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


Coinbase /Phantom / Moonshot 应用程序排名


现在,有许多与加密货币生命周期相关的支持证据,Coinbase 应用商店排名在“所有应用程序”中排名第一,这是一个明确的信号,表明正处于周期的峰值时间。


Phantom 和 Moonshot 可以作为潜在信号。Phantom 在所有应用程序上排名第一将是一个毫无疑问的退出指标。通常 Coinbase App Store 排名趋势在周期的最后几个月出现高峰和低谷,当它在所有应用上排名第一时,往往在不到 4 周的时间内就会出现一个主要顶部。该指标同样需要结合其他指标使用。
可以使用 AppFigures 实时跟踪,或者可以关注 Coinbase 应用商店排名等机器人获取每日更新。Bitcoindata 21 还提供带有情绪分析的定期更新。


搜索趋势
可以使用 Google 搜索趋势来确定市场情绪,并了解大众在任何特定时刻感兴趣的内容,但大多数人搜索的关键词非常浅显,例如“比特币”或“加密货币”。您需要更加具体才能真正获得一些信号。例如:BINANCE LOGIN、CHEAPEST CRYPTO、CRYPTO APP、COINMARKETCAP、BUY CRYPTO、CRYPTO PRICES 等关键词。


TOP X 市值
这是从 2020 年开始监测的一种评估市场周期的方法,其对追踪 2021 年中期周期的峰值非常有帮助。如果预期是加密货币长期增长,那么预计市值将全面增长。无论上轮周期的 TOP 10、TOP 25 或 TOP 100 代币等的峰值是多少,这轮周期在峰值到来之前都会被超越。


例如在上轮周期中,要进入 2021 年 11 月峰值的前 100 名,需要市值达到约 12 亿美元。如今要进入 Coinmarketcap 的前 100 名,市值需要 12.5 亿美元。目前已经略微超过了前一轮周期的峰值。根据对总市值的看法,保守预期是,在周期峰值之前,前 100 名的市值至少应达到约 20 亿美元。一旦达到这个区域,毫无疑问,应该开始寻找退出机会。


3 个月年化基差
3 个月年化基差只是一种快速了解衍生品市场泡沫的方法,不过其更有助于强调什么时候应该谨慎地降低风险,而不是在预期周期见顶的时候完全退出现货投资组合。尽管如此,从历史上看,当 3 个月年化基差超过 30% 时,情况就开始变得危险。因为衍生品的泡沫程度随着接近周期峰值(甚至是中期峰值)而增大而不是减小。

牛市指南:12个周期判定工具和撤退指标一览


数据来源

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手1h ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手1h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手1h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

707 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片