abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-12-04Last updated on 2024-12-04

Abstract

K线工具GMGN、Photon速度与abot相近,Ray地址监控速度最快。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|南枳(@Assassin_Malvo

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

Meme 市场在 24 年下半年愈发火热,各类 Meme 交易 Bot 和辅助工具不断涌现。但在 10 月末,在中文区占有相当份额的 NFTSniper(按照惯用说法下称 abot)宣布将于 25 年 1 月 1 日下架,该工具在 Meme 交易方面的主要优势包括功能全面、延迟低、迭代快,并能根据热点更新独家、实用的工具(包括 Meme 和非 Meme 方面)。

abot 宣布即将下线后,可以看到一些交易 Bot 瞄准了 abot 用户,迭代或升级了相近功能。本文旨在针对 abot 的优势功能,探究哪些工具可以作为平替。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

K 线与价格

K 线与价格是 Meme 交易的最基本信息。本节以 GMGN(左上)、Photon(右上)、abot(左下)、Dexscreener(右下)作为对比对象进行比较。

本节选取了 XRP(AZZy……)作为研究对象,基本每一秒都有交易发生。对四个工具 K 线同时截图如下,第一张图中可以看到 GMGN 与 abot K 线保持一致,Photon 则相差一秒,Dexscreener 相差了七根 1 秒 K 线。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

第一次测试

数秒后截图如下,GMGN 与 abot K 线保持一致,Photon 仍相差一秒,Dexscreener 相差六根 1 秒 K 线。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

第二次测试

数秒后截图如下,本次 GMGN、abot、Photon 均保持一致,Dexscreener 相差五根 1 秒 K 线。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

第三次测试

改名

Pump 代币往往会关联 X 账号,而 X 账号的改名记录成为判断是否为“Rug”项目的有效因素。改名历史查询此前基本属于 abot 独一档的功能,少量专业的 X 账号工具如 Moni 等也提供相似功能,但因为收费昂贵没有大面积推广。

上周,GMGN 更新了改名历史信息栏(但不支持主动查询),实现了该功能的平替版本。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

此外,Telegram 交易 Bot Solver也提供改名查询功能,也能实现相同的效果。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

此外据作者了解,改名查询工具实际上是定期轮询每个账号的 uid 和名称并进行保存,而非官方内部数据调取,多数通过https://totoml.app API 实现,感兴趣的读者可进行二次开发。

地址监控

本节测试了几个公开的、免费版本的地址监控工具,针对其响应速度进行对比,测试对象包括 abot、RayDiTingGMGN 等四个工具,在图中分别从左到右展示。

本节进行了七次 SOL 与 USDC 的兑换作为测试,第一次结果如下图所示:

abot 反馈速度最快,其次 Ray 与 Diting 基本同时发出,而后是 GMGN。其中下图时间受限于作者截图速度,仅为展示前后顺序用,非真实时间差异。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

第一次测试

第二次结果如下图所示:

其中 Ray 速度最快,abot 其次,而后分别是 Diting、GMGN。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

第二次测试

之后的五次测试,结果都与第二次一致,Ray 最先推送而后是 abot,二者相差直接体感在 1 秒之内,目前来看是更优的监控工具。

虽然 Ray 速度最快,但免费版仅限监控 10 个钱包,每分钟有着 15 次的推送上限,另有三个付费版本,读者可自行考虑是否选用。

推特监控

该功能在 Meme 方面用例较少但较为实用,作者已知的平替工具仅有付费工具apidance,用途为推送关注对象的新增关注、新推文等操作,但有数十秒的延迟,若要超低延迟监控仍建议使用推特小铃铛功能。

abot下架在即,哪些优势功能有平替工具?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Crypto 美股观察:CRCL、HOOD、COIN 与 MSTR,最近在交易什么?

Recent weeks have seen significant developments for four key US-listed crypto-related stocks—Circle (CRCL), Robinhood (HOOD), Coinbase (COIN), and MicroStrategy (MSTR)—with their core investment theses diverging. For **Circle (CRCL)**, its stock price is increasingly realigning with the fundamental driver of **USDC circulation**. After IPO exuberance faded, CRCL's performance now correlates closely with changes in USDC supply, which is heavily influenced by DeFi activity and risk appetite. The recent contraction in USDC, linked to events like the KelpDAO incident, has pressured the stock. A sustainable recovery signal for CRCL would require a confluence of recovering DeFi TVL, stablecoin demand, and consecutive weeks of USDC net issuance. **Robinhood (HOOD)** gained market attention with the launch of its **Robinhood Chain**, an Ethereum L2. While not an immediate threat to Coinbase's dominant Base network in terms of scale or developer ecosystem, it represents a strategic encroachment. Robinhood's path—leveraging its traditional retail brokerage user base and assets to build a chain-based financial system—challenges Coinbase's narrative as the sole listed company integrating crypto-native infrastructure with traditional finance. This could dilute COIN's long-term scarcity premium. **MicroStrategy (MSTR)** made a notable shift by **selling Bitcoin** for the first time in a meaningful way (3,588 BTC), breaking its long-standing "buy-only" posture. The sales, used to fund dividends and replenish USD reserves, signal a move towards active capital management. While not indicative of a bearish turn on Bitcoin, it introduces new complexity for MSTR investors. The stock must now be evaluated not just as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy, but also considering fixed cash obligations from preferred dividends and debt, alongside its capital allocation strategy between holding BTC and maintaining liquidity. In summary, the investment narratives for these stocks are evolving beyond simple crypto market beta. Key variables now include stablecoin fundamentals, competition in chain-based financial ecosystems, and the balance between asset accumulation and corporate capital structure management.

marsbit2m ago

Crypto 美股观察:CRCL、HOOD、COIN 与 MSTR,最近在交易什么?

marsbit2m ago

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

Robinhood has launched "Robinhood Chain," an Ethereum-based Layer 2 built with Arbitrum technology, and introduced "Stock Tokens." This article clarifies that these tokens are not actual on-chain equity. They are tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited, offering economic exposure to reference stocks or ETFs but lacking direct ownership, voting rights, or other shareholder privileges. The legal structure is conservative, relying on traditional financial intermediaries, custody, KYC/AML controls, and specific jurisdiction rules, even though the tokens are transferable on-chain. The move is part of Robinhood's broader strategy to evolve from a retail brokerage into a global financial ecosystem, integrating services like banking, retirement, crypto, and DeFi. Robinhood Chain aims to provide a programmable settlement layer, making financial products more portable and accessible while masking underlying complexity. However, the "brokerage chain paradox" lies in balancing a simple user interface with the intricate, regulated reality of the wrapped assets. The success of this model depends on users and regulators accepting this structured approach without misunderstanding the tokens as direct stock ownership. Key components supporting this strategy include the Bitstamp acquisition (expanding institutional crypto capabilities), the Robinhood Wallet (bridging brokerage and self-custody), the Robinhood Earn program (integrating DeFi lending), and the Lighter perpetual contracts platform. While ambitious, the initiative is still early, facing challenges in achieving liquidity, developer adoption, and regulatory clarity across jurisdictions.

marsbit1h ago

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

marsbit1h ago

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片