SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2024-09-16Обновлено 2024-09-16

Введение

上周大部分时间里市场表现平稳,但到了周五,市场预期9月降息50个基点的可能性突然从15%左右飙升至约50% ,且几乎没有明确的消息可解释这一变化,经济数据基本符合预期,并非影响因素,而美联储仍处于缄默期,这让市场参与者猜测,这次的重新定价可能是由前美联储官员和记者的评论所引发的...

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

上周大部分时间里市场表现平稳,但到了周五,市场预期 9 月降息 50 个基点的可能性突然从 15% 左右飙升至约 50% ,且几乎没有明确的消息可解释这一变化,经济数据基本符合预期,并非影响因素,而美联储仍处于缄默期,这让市场参与者猜测,这次的重新定价可能是由前美联储官员和记者的评论所引发的。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

首先是《华尔街日报》的 Timiraros,他引用 Powell 的前高级顾问 Jon Faust 的话,表示“稍微倾向于从 50 个基点开始”,且他相信“有很大的机会 FOMC 会这样做”,此外,他提到美联储可以通过“大量言语解释来缓解...使得大幅度降息不会成为担忧的迹象”,以管理投资者对更大幅度降息的忧虑,如果美联储反而选择先小幅降息 25 个基点,可能会引发“尴尬的问题”。

接下来,英国《金融时报》也发表了一篇文章,称美联储在 9 月降息 25 或者 50 个基点是非常艰难的抉择。最后,前纽约联储主席 Dudley 进行了更强烈的评论,称“我认为有很强的理由支持 50 个基点降息,无论他们会不会这样做”,并补充说,考虑到当前的联邦基金利率比中性利率高出近 200 个基点,“所以问题是:为什么不现在就开始降息?”

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

由于利率重新定价,美债收益率曲线继续牛陡走势, 2/10 s 走升 4.5 个基点,使曲线达到 2 年来的最陡水平,并在长期的倒挂后(自 2021 年起)重新回到正值领域。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

我们已经多次谈到美联储正式转向宽松倾向的“政策更迭”,这一点通过持续的收益率曲线走陡以及债券与股票相关性重新回到负值区域可以明显看出。

过去一年,股票和债券的走势几乎同步,两类资产都反映了市场对美联储政策的单向押注。然而,自 8 月“闪崩”以来,市场再次开始关注经济轨迹而非仅仅是美联储的刺激措施,使得这两类资产的走势重新回到风险分散模式。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

随著美国利率再次成为市场焦点,外汇市场也随之反应,美元指数(DXY)和美元兑日圆(USDJPY)均与收益率同步波动,分别在技术关键水平 100 和 140 附近徘徊。另一方面,美国股市至少暂时逆转了季节性疲软的趋势,SPX 上周表现是全年最佳之一。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

强劲反弹的部分原因可能是基金经理人对收益的追逐,摩根大通报告称, 8 月份股票共同基金出现 550 亿美元的资金流出,这是 2022 年以来最严重的一次。在重要的 9 月末,无论是否降息 50 个基点,这种情况有机会出现大幅逆转吗?

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

在加密货币方面,随著宏观情绪继续主导价格走势,链上缺乏其他显著进展,BTC 与 SPX 的相关性已升至历史最高水平附近,由于市场情绪暂时有所改善,BTC 价格回升至 58-60 k 美元区间,BTC ETF 在上周五也流入 2.63 亿美元,甚至 ETH ETF 的资金流出也暂时停止,而随著交易员继续倾向卖出备兑看涨期权以获取收益,隐含波动率则有所下降。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

然而,尽管暂时得到缓解,中期阻力和挑战依然存在,ETH 继续面临困境,ETH/BTC 已跌至 5 年低点,且目前仍看不到尽头。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

在新闻方面,Coinbase 宣布推出自己的 wrapped BTC(cbBTC),SWIFT 宣布代币化资产转移基础设施的计划,加剧了人们对数字资产日益中心化的担忧,不过随著传统金融(TradFi)在加密货币领域的影响力不断增加,这种趋势可能会持续下去。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

本周将是充满央行活动的一周,包括美联储、挪威、日本、英国、巴西、南非、泰国、台湾和印尼央行都将举行会议。在经济数据方面,中国的信贷供给和零售数据将受到关注,以了解经济持续放缓的情况,而周二的美国零售销售数据应该是 FOMC 会议前最重要的数据,有可能影响降息 25 或者 50 个基点的最终决策。

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

祝各位好运,SignalPlus 团队期待与您在本周的 Token 2049 活动上进一步交流!

SignalPlus宏观分析(20240916):50 is the New 25

您可在 t.signalplus.com 使用 SignalPlus 交易风向标功能,获取更多实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlusCN,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:SignalPlus 123)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-09-16/4410aefa68c6367ea94a8b85bcb8730b

Похожее

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手1 ч. назад

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手1 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手1 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片