稳定币将控制15%的美国国债市场?专家说…

币界网2024-08-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-22 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:
    稳定币可能是美国国债(债券市场)的主要参与者。根据Bitwise高管的说法,稳定币在美国国债中的持股比例可能会增长到15%。

美国国债已成为大多数稳定币发行人最青睐的备用资产。鉴于其安全性和流动性,Tether和Circle等发行商已成为市场上的关键参与者,为发行的每一个稳定币代币提供1:1的支持。

数字资产管理公司Bitwise的投资策略师Juan Leon表示,稳定币持有的美国国债可能会从目前的1%增长到15%。

稳定币目前持有约1%的美国国债,但很快可能会增长到15%,使其跻身前三大持有者之列

稳定币:不是“小鲸鱼?”

上述Bitwise前景是对彭博社最近一份报告的反应,该报告淡化了稳定币在美国国债市场的重要性。

根据该报告,稳定币对市场1%的控制意味着发行人是“小鲸鱼”,其影响力不如其他债券市场参与者。

然而,Leon指出,数字经济正以3倍的速度增长,美国稳定币框架可能会加速这一领域的发展。

她补充说,稳定币在几年内从0美元增长到1700亿美元,当美国在2025年通过稳定币法案时,可能会更快地增长到1万亿美元。

稳定币的使用量正以指数级速度增长,这意味着从1700亿美元到1T美元的增长速度将快于从0美元到1700亿美元的增长。以1万亿美元的价格,稳定币购买国库券将使10只最大的货币市场基金相形见绌,并将使它们跻身前三大持有者之列(8000多亿美元)

美国投资银行巨头Cantor Fitzgerald的董事长霍华德·卢特尼克(Howard Lutnick)呼应了莱昂的观点。Lutnick称赞Tether通过选择美国国债作为备用来帮助偿还美国债务。

Tether通过将数字美元USDT交到世界各地新兴市场的人们手中,将这一点提升到了一个新的水平。由于USDT由数百亿美元的美国国债支持,全球3亿USDT钱包持有者正在帮助我们为债务融资

Lekker Capital的加密货币对冲创始人Quinn Thompson指出,Lutnick对Tether的公开支持预示着可能的“变化”

根据Coingecko的数据,截至撰写本文时,稳定币的市值为1695亿美元,Tether的USDT以1170亿美元领先,其次是Circle的USDC,为348亿美元。

İlgili Okumalar

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

In a concentrated move over the past week, several Wall Street giants have advanced their tokenized money market fund initiatives, signaling a strategic shift driven by impending U.S. stablecoin regulations. JPMorgan Chase launched its second such fund, JLTXX, on Ethereum, explicitly targeting future stablecoin issuer reserve needs. Concurrently, Franklin Templeton partnered with Kraken to integrate its BENJI tokenized funds onto the exchange platform for use as collateral and cash management tools. BlackRock further solidified its position by filing for two new tokenized funds with the SEC, aiming to convert its massive traditional stablecoin custody business into a tokenized model. These parallel developments represent a multi-pronged institutional "compliance hunt" to capture future crypto liquidity. BlackRock and JPMorgan are focusing on the backend, preparing to serve as the core reserve and settlement infrastructure for compliant stablecoins as outlined by the GENIUS Act. This act defines strict "qualified reserve asset" requirements for stablecoin backing while prohibiting interest payments to holders. Franklin Templeton and Kraken, however, are exploiting a potential regulatory gap. By offering a tokenized fund (BENJI) that is not a stablecoin, they aim to provide yield-bearing, collateralizable digital cash instruments, circumventing GENIUS Act's ban on stablecoin yield. The impending CLARITY Act, which will delineate digital asset market structure, is seen as a complementary piece to GENIUS. Its treatment of passive income could solidify the niche for instruments like BENJI. With conservative market size estimates for tokenized money market funds reaching hundreds of billions by 2030, Wall Street institutions are positioning themselves early, using on-chain settlement as a key competitive differentiator to offer superior liquidity and composability for the next generation of dollar reserves.

marsbit1 saat önce

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

marsbit1 saat önce

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

In a California court, Sam Altman testified for the first time in the ongoing legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI. Altman made a striking claim: Musk once suggested that control of OpenAI could one day be passed down to his children. This statement reframes the long-standing conflict not as a simple governance dispute but as a foundational power struggle. Altman sought to counter the narrative that OpenAI betrayed its original non-profit, idealistic mission. He argued that from the beginning, it was Musk who sought increasing control over the organization, including a larger equity stake and ultimate decision-making authority. Altman opposed this, citing OpenAI's core principle that AGI should not be controlled by any single individual. He also addressed the key point of contention about OpenAI's shift to a for-profit structure, claiming Musk was aware of and initially supportive of exploring such a model to secure the massive funding needed for advanced AI research. Altman framed the change as a practical necessity, not a betrayal. Further testimony revealed internal concerns after Musk left OpenAI's board, with worries he might take retaliatory action. Altman critiqued Musk's management style as unsuitable for a research lab, damaging morale and culture. Throughout his testimony, Altman's focus appeared to shift from technological idealism to the realities of organizational governance and resource requirements. Regarding his brief ouster in 2023, Altman stated he seriously considered joining Microsoft but ultimately returned because OpenAI was too important to abandon.

marsbit2 saat önce

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片