巨鲸增持放缓,比特币受挫于 6.1 万美元阻力位

链捕手Published on 2024-08-21Last updated on 2024-08-21

作者:Mary Liu,比推 BitpushNews

 

周二金融市场表现较为平静,在本周杰克逊霍尔全球央行年会召开之前,未出现明显的市场催化剂。

比推数据显示,比特币在周二凌晨一度飙升至 61,000 美元以上,然而未能继续突破,午盘后回落至 59,000 美元的支撑位,截至发稿时,比特币交易价格为 59,341 美元,24 小时涨幅 0.36%。

另外,市值排名前 200 位的山寨币代币大多数都出现上涨。 Meme 币 Brett (BRETT) 涨幅最大,上涨 18%,其次是 BitTorrent (BTT) 和 BinaryX (BNX),分别上涨 16.4% 和 12.3%。莱特币 (LTC) 跌幅最大,下跌 3.3%, dYdX (DYDX) 下跌 3.2%,MANTRA (OM) 下跌 2.6%。 目前加密货币整体市值为 2.11 万亿美元,比特币的市场占有率为 55.7%。

美股方面,收盘时,标普 500 指数和纳斯达克指数分别下跌 0.20% 和 0.33%,道指持平。

巨鲸增持放缓

链上分析公司 CryptoQuant 表示,目前「大多数」需求指标都显示出疲软。CryptoQuant 数据显示,较大的 BTC 持有者(相当于巨鲸)自 3 月份创下历史新高以来,已经大幅降低了囤币速度。

报告显示:「鲸鱼持有量的 30 天百分比变化已从 2 月份的 6%(自 2019 年 2 月以来的最快速度)下降至目前的 1%,从历史上看,鲸鱼持有量的月增长率超过 3% 就与比特币价格上涨有关,但目前情况并非如此。」

不过,市场面临的「夏季低迷」的一个例外是「永久持有者」——只买入、从不卖出 BTC 的实体。

报告指出:「尽管比特币整体需求增长放缓,但永久持有者仍继续以前所未有的水平积累比特币。这些持有者的总余额正以创纪录的每月 39.1 万比特币的速度增长。永久持有者的需求增长速度甚至比 2024 年第一季度比特币价格超过 7 万美元时还要快。」

 

分析师:市场正在逐步回暖

Bitfinex 分析师认为,市场正在逐步回暖,在 8 月初出现大量资金流出后,与以太坊 ETF 不同,比特币现货 ETF 上周净流入 3240 万美元,表明被动投资者的兴趣持续存在,BTC 价格多次突破约 60,000 美元的区间低点。

他们表示:「过去一周,ETF 中确实出现了一些逢低买入和获利回吐的现象,投资者趁着低于 50,000 美元的价位买入,然后至少获利回吐了一部分。这与以太坊 ETF 形成了鲜明对比,尽管以太坊价格的跌幅远大于比特币价格,但以太坊 ETF 本周仍录得净流出。」

流入贝莱德 iShares 比特币 ETF(IBIT)和富达比特币基金(FBTC)的资金有助于防止进一步下跌损失,Bitfinex 将其称为「『被动』需求,他们用这个术语来定义以价格不可知的方式进行系统性投资的 ETF 流入。」

分析师表示:「以太坊 ETF 的投资流入出现这种差异,反映了更广泛的市场对比特币作为一种资产的信心,尽管存在美国政府和 Mt.Gox 等大持有者可能出现的 BTC 供应过剩等挑战。BTC 和 ETH ETF 的命运截然不同,凸显了这两个市场的不同动态。虽然比特币 ETF 成功吸引了持续的资金流入,但以太坊 ETF 却难以保持势头。Grayscale ETH 供应的枯竭可能是以太坊 ETF 的转折点,但未来几个月对于确定需求能否支撑这个市场至关重要。」

该报告补充道:「同样值得注意的是,BTC 目前正试图突破四个月区间的低点。因此,我们处于阻力位,预计接下来不会出现任何爆炸性走势,因为缺乏任何潜在催化剂,夏季的疲软和流动性不足现在仍然普遍存在。」

Bitfinex 表示,通过查看比特币减半后的历史表现,下图「表明,尽管最近有所下滑,但 BTC 仍遵循着与过去牛市和减半周期类似的轨迹。」

他们表示:「这些模式表明,减半后的周期通常会出现大幅反弹,即使之前出现短期下跌。截至 2024 年减半年的第 230 天(8 月 17 日),年初至今的标准化回报率为 1.38(38%)。」

他们指出:「在同一阶段,2016 年和 2020 年减半后,我们的回报比分别达到 1.32 和 1.68;因此,当前的调整并不罕见,尽管最近跌破 50,000 美元可能是减半后传统的最后一次调整,但我们仍有望遵循过去的牛市轨迹,并可能在第三季度再进行一次最后一次调整,与 2020 年减半后的轨迹一致。」

Bitfinex 分析师总结道:「可以预计,夏季流动性不足将继续。更广泛的宏观经济环境,包括美联储可能降息,也将在塑造 BTC 和 ETH 未来 ETF 流动方面发挥重要作用。投资者应该密切关注这些发展,因为它们可以提供对市场走势的进一步洞察。」

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

AI Sweeps the Globe, So Why Is Crypto + AI Facing Gloom?

The article "AI Sweeps the Globe, But Why Is Crypto + AI So Bleak?" analyzes the disconnect between the booming AI industry and the struggling crypto+AI sector. It argues the issue is not flawed logic but severe demand-supply mismatch across four key sub-sectors. Decentralized compute and storage projects offer theoretical benefits like cost savings and data sovereignty but lack a decisive technical edge over entrenched cloud providers (AWS, GCP). Enterprises are unwilling to risk migration for unproven infrastructure that can't guarantee the performance and reliability needed for critical AI workloads. ZKML and privacy solutions address important issues like model verification but solve non-urgent, long-term concerns for most businesses currently focused on core performance and ROI. Demand here is likely to be regulation-driven (e.g., EU AI Act) rather than organic. AI agent infrastructure is developing foundational tech for a future multi-agent economy. However, the current market phase is dominated by internal process automation within single companies, making this technology premature. AI agent payments is highlighted as the only sub-sector where blockchain competes on a level playing field with traditional finance, as neither has adequately solved the challenges of machine-to-machine micropayments and real-time settlement. Overall, crypto+AI projects are building for future needs (data ownership, decentralization, transparency) that don't align with the industry's immediate priorities (performance, cost, stability). The absence of a flagship, large-scale use case further hinders mainstream adoption and capital inflow. The path forward requires either adapting to current market demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

marsbit7m ago

AI Sweeps the Globe, So Why Is Crypto + AI Facing Gloom?

marsbit7m ago

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

On June 29, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes purchased approximately 6.16 million SYN tokens via OTC platform Flowdesk for around $2.2 million. Hayes subsequently declared on X that SYN represents one of the most asymmetric investments he has seen since HYPE, stating it's time for an options DEX to challenge the dominant platform Deribit, and identifying Hypercall as that challenger. SYN's price surged over 40% following his comments, with a tenfold increase in June 2026 alone, bringing its FDV to roughly $110 million. The article details Synapse Protocol's evolution from a cross-chain messaging and liquidity network into the chain-based options trading protocol Hypercall. Hypercall, built on the Hyperliquid ecosystem's HyperEVM, aims to be a universal options exchange supporting any asset size with capped loss (limited to premium paid) and no forced liquidations. Deribit, established in 2016, remains the centralized leader in crypto options with an estimated 85% market share in BTC and ETH options and $3.588 billion in assets. Its strengths include deep liquidity and professional tools, but it faces criticisms over custody risk, KYC requirements, and regulatory uncertainty. The analysis positions Hypercall not as an immediate replacement for Deribit's entrenched network effects, but as a potential complementary and differentiated competitor, particularly for DeFi-native assets and new asset classes like RWA. The article concludes by noting Hayes's recent mixed "call" record, including fully exiting and later re-buying HYPE, and the controversial price target for CARDS from his family office Maelstrom, which was followed by a significant price drop.

marsbit28m ago

"King of Pump Calls" Arthur Hayes Strikes Again, This Time Targeting Deribit

marsbit28m ago

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

AI Booms, But Crypto + AI Remains Sluggish: A Demand-Side Analysis Despite the AI industry's explosive growth and massive investment, the convergence of blockchain and AI (Crypto + AI) has seen limited traction. The core issue is a severe supply-demand mismatch, not a flawed premise. Analyzing four key sub-sectors reveals specific gaps: 1. **Decentralized Compute/Storage:** Offer logical benefits like data sovereignty and cost savings but lack a decisive technical advantage over entrenched cloud giants (AWS, GCP). Enterprises prioritize performance and stability and are unwilling to bear the switching risk and uncertainty of decentralized networks. 2. **Model Verification/Privacy (e.g., ZKML):** Address important long-term issues like auditability and data privacy, but these are not urgent operational pain points for most businesses today. Widespread demand will likely follow regulatory mandates (like the EU AI Act), not precede them. 3. **AI Agent Infrastructure:** Projects are building infrastructure for a future of autonomous, interacting agents. However, the current market focus is on internal process automation within corporate firewalls. The technology is ahead of market readiness. 4. **AI Agent Payments:** This is the only sub-sector where blockchain is on a level playing field with traditional finance. Both are trying to solve the unsolved problem of real-time, micro-transactions for machines, making it the most immediately competitive area. The overarching problem is that the AI industry invests heavily in solutions that solve immediate bottlenecks (e.g., faster memory, more power). Most Crypto + AI solutions target secondary, longer-term concerns (decentralization, transparency) and often come with performance trade-offs. The lack of a flagship, large-scale commercial success case further hinders mainstream capital inflow. The path forward requires either aligning more closely with the current industry's performance demands or patiently building the foundational infrastructure for the next phase of AI.

Foresight News38m ago

AI is Sweeping the Globe, So Why is Crypto + AI in a Slump?

Foresight News38m ago

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbit1h ago

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbit1h ago

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbit1h ago

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

505 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片