为 Meme PVP 推波助澜, 这届 DeFi 们业务转型的新选择

深潮Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

注意力在哪里流动性就在哪里。

撰文:深潮 TechFlow

从创新匮乏到投机盛行,市场逐渐陷入尴尬境地。

Solana 上 Meme 横行,Pump.fun 收入节节高,发币从未如此直接和简单...

随之而来的是,加密市场逐渐演变成了一个残酷的"玩家对玩家"(PvP)游戏。在这个零和博弈中,参与者的目标不是创造价值,而是从其他参与者那里获取利益。每一个赢家的背后都意味着有人成为输家。

每个人都是当下加密现状的接受者、参与者而非改变者;而更多敏锐的人,则做起了“推动者”的生意:

比如在昨日,Solana 生态上一个叫做 The Arena 的平台出现,其业务非常“贴合”当下市场 --- 允许玩家在链上对任意新出现的 Solana 代币进行做多、做空或者对冲。

平台的名字(Arena,即斗技场)已经赤裸的揭示了该业务的本质,在现货之外进一步放大了 PVP 的程度,杠杆之上的一场残酷角斗。

而在 Arena 的背后,是另一个知名DeFi协议 Marginfi 在提供借贷资金池,以支持 Arena 的做多做空逻辑能够顺利运行。

PVP 斗技场,Marginfi 提供借贷池

The Arena 这个业务如何实现?

简单说,The Arena 是一个基于独立借贷池的交易平台,允许用户对Solana上的新代币进行杠杆多空操作。

用户可以创建经过审计的开源的借贷池,且没有无常损失。

The Arena特别强调了它针对Solana上的新代币。正如他们所说,Solana每天都在产生大量新代币,但传统上交易者对这些新代币的操作非常有限。

怎么理解独立的借贷池?

通俗来说,这意味着每个代币都有自己的专用池,而不是像Uniswap那样的AMM配对池。同时池中的资金是过度抵押的,这意味着存入的资金比借出的更多,以确保安全性。

而这个借贷池源自于去中心化的借贷协议 marginfi,提供必要的DeFI基础设施。

让我们用个更通俗的例子来理解这种运作模式:

想象The Arena是一个特殊的"游戏场",里面有很多不同的"游戏房间",每个房间代表一种代币。

假设有一个新币叫DOGEE,在DOGEE的"游戏房间"里:

你可以成为"房主",把自己的DOGEE或其他认可的代币(比如USDC)放入这个房间。

你的收益:其他人使用这个房间时,会付给你一些费用(利息)。

你的风险:如果有人借走DOGEE但没还回来,你可能会损失一部分存入的代币。

为什么要做房主?答案是赚取利息,就像把钱存在银行里一样,但收益可能更高。

其他人可以来"玩游戏"(交易),做多/空DOGEE。

这里面借贷具体怎么发生的?

想象The Arena有一个"魔法箱",可以快速借出和归还代币。

做多DOGEE的过程如下:

  • 玩家把一些抵押品(比如USDC)放入游戏房间。他们从"魔法箱"借出USDC。

  • 立即用这些USDC买入更多的DOGEE。

  • 如果DOGEE价格上涨,他们就赚钱了。

  • 最后,他们需要卖出一部分DOGEE,还回借的USDC,并支付一些费用。

做空DOGEE的原理类似,不再赘述。

当用户在The Arena上进行交易时,实际的借贷操作通过Marginfi完成,同时还可以使用 Marginfi的闪电贷功能,允许在同一交易中完成借入和归还。

如果The Arena是加剧PVP的杠杆游戏,Marginfi就像是背后的游戏引擎。你只需要关注游戏界面(The Arena),而不需要了解引擎(Marginfi)如何工作。

DeFi 推波助澜,交易不停歇

在古罗马,竞技场是角斗士进行生死搏斗的地方,观众们则在周围欢呼喝彩。

在加密市场,The Arena 这类项目则会让 Meme PVP 变得更加激烈,但项目本身可以通过收手续费获益,同时背后的 DeFi 协议 Marginfi 等也能盘活自己的借贷业务,同样获取收益。

收取“台子费”必然是稳赚不赔的生意,擂台上 degen 们的生死,恐怕并不是首要考虑因素。

和吸烟有害健康类似,竞技场门口写着“杠杆有风险”,你猜能不能拦住 degen 那颗想要入场的心。

无独有偶,我们之前也在《解读 dumpy.fun :Solend 更名后的新产品,允许做空 Meme 币》 中提到,名字和Pump.fun 对标的 dumpy.fun,也是允许做空 Meme 币,背后同样也是另一个 DeFi 协议 Solend。

你很容易看到,如今 DeFi 们业务转型的方向之一,便成了为 PVP 推波助澜。

交易越频繁,他们的收入就越丰厚。但 DeFi OG 们赋能这样的 PVP 平台,是否正在加剧市场的投机行为?

这个问题恐怕没有正确答案。

但“注意力在哪里流动性就在哪里,流动性在哪里机会就在哪里,机会在哪里注意力就在哪里”。在这个加密市场逻辑闭环中,鼓励投机加速波动,已然成为协议和开发者们难以拒绝、近乎本能、有利可图的最优解。

交易不停歇,对战更猛烈。

做好风险管理,且看市场浮沉。

 

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

Authors: Dave Mazza, Thomas DiFazio | Source: Deep Tide TechFlow The article, written by Roundhill Investments (issuer of the DRAM ETF), responds to Morningstar's caution about investing in memory chip stocks. Morningstar warns of the sector's history of boom-bust cycles, a lack of economic moats, and potential momentum-driven overvaluation. Roundhill argues the current situation is structurally different due to AI. Key points in Roundhill's rebuttal include: * **Changed Demand & Supply Dynamics:** AI infrastructure, not consumer electronics, is now the primary growth driver for memory demand. New, strict long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers reflect the high capital intensity of advanced manufacturing. * **Existence of a Moat:** High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI, has extremely high manufacturing barriers. The market is dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, with new entrants blocked by technological complexity and long lead times for equipment like ASML's EUV machines. * **Strong Fundamental Outlook:** Analyst consensus projects the three companies will rank among the world's most profitable by 2027, with combined profits of $704 billion on over $1 trillion in revenue. Their operating margins have already reached record highs. * **Valuation Re-rating:** Despite significant stock price gains, memory stocks trade at attractive valuations (e.g., a median NTM P/E of 8.37x for the DRAM ETF) relative to projected explosive EPS growth. Roundhill suggests historical valuation frameworks may no longer apply given the new profitability paradigm. Conclusion: Roundhill contends the rally is justified by fundamentals, marking a structural shift for the memory industry into a new era of sustained, AI-driven demand against constrained supply, rather than a repeat of past cycles.

marsbit7m ago

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

marsbit7m ago

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报48m ago

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报48m ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbit59m ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbit59m ago

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手1h ago

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片