第二层是Meme币的未来吗?令人兴奋的PEPU项目筹集了780万美元

币界网Published on 2024-08-10Last updated on 2024-08-10

币界网报道:

忘掉你所知道的关于模因币的一切——被解放的佩佩已经准备好改变现状了。

这个Layer-2 meme项目引起了人们的关注,并在预售中筹集了780万美元。

随着DEX上市的临近,许多人认为Pepe Unchained(PEPU)即将腾飞。

第2层网络充当加密货币的快车道

想象一下,在市场疯狂的时候试图交换一些代币——突然之间,你的交易费用飙升。

这就是第二层网络的用武之地。

它们就像建立在较慢的区块链(如以太坊)之上的快速通道,旨在处理主链上的大量交易流量。

把它想象成加密拼车。

第2层解决方案将它们捆绑在一起并转移到其他地方,而不是让每笔交易(或汽车)都堵塞高速公路。

一旦它们被验证,它们就会合并回主链。

这种巧妙的方法转化为闪电般的速度和最低的费用。

一些二层网络,如Optimism或Arbitrum,可以比以太坊快100倍地处理交易。

最好的部分呢?

你仍然可以获得以太坊主区块链的所有安全优势。

很容易看出为什么这些二层网络如此受欢迎。

事实上,根据L2Beat的数据,现在所有顶级二层的价值都超过了360亿美元。

Pepe Unchained的第2层可能会扰乱Meme Coin行业

许多人认为模因币是加密货币市场最令人兴奋的部分。

但让我们面对现实吧——它们也有缺点。

以太坊上天文般的天然气费用和缓慢的交易足以让最有经验的交易者感到沮丧。

然而,第二层解决方案可能是答案。

通过正面解决这些可扩展性问题,Layer-2s可以解决模因币行业的问题。

想象一下,你可以用几分之一美分的费用购买你最喜欢的狗主题代币,或者在市场火爆时卖出。

这就是Pepe Unchained的用武之地。

开发人员不仅仅使用现有的第2层,他们还在构建自己的,明确用于模因币。

这就像是市场上最有趣的代币的VIP区。

通过专注于模因币,Pepe Unchained的Layer-2可以提供费用和速度,使竞争对手(例如以太坊和Solana)看起来过时。

根据Pepe Unchained的白皮书,他们的第2层将比以太坊快100倍,有一个专用的区块浏览器,并提供即时桥接。

仅这三个功能就可能对模因币交易者来说是巨大的。

PEPU预售融资超过780万美元,代币在社交媒体上疯传

《解放的佩佩》吸引了市场各个角落的关注。

该项目的预售已筹集了780多万美元,投资者争相以每股0.0089461美元的低价获得PEPU。

没有人想错过。

但这不仅仅是折扣价。

Pepe Unchained的质押协议也引起了轰动。

PEPU持有者可以锁定他们的代币并获得奖励,目前年收益率估计为247%。

这些收益率为持有者提供了保留代币而不是出售代币的理由。

社交媒体上的炒作也在增长。

加密推特上充满了PEPU表情包,该项目的官方账号刚刚超过10000名粉丝。

甚至像ClayBro这样的顶级YouTube用户也参与其中,向他们的庞大受众传播信息。

有了这些嗡嗡声,《解放的佩佩》成为热门话题也就不足为奇了。

如果开发者能够信守承诺,Pepe Unchained即将推出的Layer-2解决方案可能会改变模因币市场。

参观Pepe Unchained预售

免责声明:以上文章为赞助内容;它是由第三方写的。CryptoPotato不对本页面上的内容、广告、产品、质量、准确性或其他材料进行背书或承担责任。其中的任何内容都不应被解释为财务建议。强烈建议读者在参与任何提及的公司或项目之前,独立、仔细地核实信息,并进行自己的研究。投资加密货币存在资金损失的风险,建议读者在做出任何可能基于或可能不基于上述赞助内容的决定之前咨询专业人士。

建议读者阅读CryptoPotato的完整免责声明。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手34m ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手34m ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit2h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit2h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手4h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手4h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit5h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片