AI海啸再袭，盘点10个值得关注的AI山寨币

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-05-13Last updated on 2024-05-13

Abstract

5月份科技行业的AI海啸或许能让AI概念山寨币行情复苏。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Golem

AI海啸再袭，盘点10个值得关注的AI山寨币

5 月份 AI 海啸再来，OpenAI 将于 5 月 14 日凌晨 1 点（UTC+ 8）发布能够对话和识别物体的多模态 AI 模型，谷歌将在 5 月 15 日凌晨 1 点（UTC+ 8）举行的 Google I/O 大会上展示最新的 AI 工具及相关产品增强功能，微软也将在 5 月 21 日举办的 Build 年度开发者大会上聚焦 AI 议题。

AI 是 2024 年各领域最受欢迎的叙事，并且会有连锁反应，早在 2 月份 OpenAI 推出文本转视频模型 Sora 时，各类 AI 概念山寨币就有过一波涨幅。5 月份科技行业的 AI 海啸或许也或许会引发加密行业 AI 概念山寨币的上涨。

Odaily 星球日报将于本文盘点 10 个价值可能被低估的 AI 概念山寨币，供大家参考。

PALM（PaLM AI）

概念：PALM AI 是由 Google 的 AI 工具套件和内部创新算法提供支持的多平台第二代 AI 解决方案。该项目的重点是开发链上 AI 集成工具以及可在现实世界使用的 AI 应用程序，同时也提供定制化 AI 机器人解决方案，以满足个人、团体、企业和项目的不同需求。PALM 是 PaLM AI 的实用代币，持有 PALM 可以参与该平台的收入分成。

市值： 7300 万美元

GLQ（GraphLinq Chain）

概念：GraphLinq 是一个区块链上的无代码自动化平台，由 GraphLinq 链和 GraphLinq 协议组成，旨在通过 IDE、App、引擎和市场四大组件，使用户无需编程技能即可轻松部署和管理各种自动化流程，同时可使用内置 AI 帮助构建 dApp。3 月 15 日完成战略轮融资，DWF Labs 参投，具体金额未披露。GLQ 是 GraphLinq 链的原生代币，用于支付网络中的 gas 费用。

市值： 3100 万美元

VMINT（VoluMint ）

概念：VoluMint 是一个 AI 自动化做市商， 可以与 CEX 和 DEX 无缝集成，并且提供完全可定制的做市方案，为加密项目提供支持。其做市解决方案包括无障碍做市机器人、AI 自动交易机器人、去中心化和不可预测的交易模式。VMINT 是 VoluMint 的实用代币，VoluMint 一定比例的收入将分配给那些选择质押代币的人，通知代币持有者也可参与项目投票治理。

市值： 1400 万美元

NAVI（Atlas Navi）

概念：Atlas Navi 是一款使用 AI 和智能手机摄像头的导航应用程序，通过检测路况、事故、每条车道的交通情况、可用停车位、警车等以避免有问题的道路，为用户找到到达目的地的最快路线。同时通过 Drive to Earn 经济模型，用户使用导航可获得 NAVI 代币奖励。Atlas Navi 2019 年从欧盟获得 120 万美元的赠款，用于开发其技术。

市值： 1100 万美元

CGPT（ChainGPT）

概念：ChainGPT 是 Web3 领域 AI 解决方案的开发商，通过将大型语言模型 (LLM) 与区块链集成为用户构建了各种工具。包括 AI 聊天机器人、AI NFT 生成器、AI 新闻聚合、AI 交易助手、自动化智能合约生成和审计等。CGPT 是 ChainGPT 是实用代币，持有者具有参与 DAO 投票、质押、免费访问 AI 工具、空投等权益。

市值： 1.1 亿美元

AI（Sleepless AI）

概念：Sleepless AI 是一款基于 AI 的虚拟伴侣游戏，利用 AIGC 和 LLM 来创建丰富的基于故事的游戏玩法以及与角色有机发展的互动。该项目目前正在开发三款游戏，其第一款游戏是 HIM，这是一款虚拟男友 Otome 游戏，现已在全球 150+个国家正式获得 Appstore 上架批准。

市值： 1.53 亿美元

GPU（Node AI）

概念：Node AI 是一个提供 GPU 和 AI 资源租用的去中心化平台。用户可质押 GPU 获得收益分成，同时提供 AI 节点租赁、GPU 算力借贷等服务。

市值： 1.21 亿美元

ENQAI（enqAI）

概念：enqAI 是一个去中心化的 AI 模型网络，完全由去中心化的 GPU 节点网络提供支持。通过这种方式，enqAI 可以使其模型做到无政治和文化偏见以及抗审查。ENQAI 是 enqAI 为提供支持的节点发放的代币奖励。

市值： 4860 万美元

EMC（Edge Matrix Computing）

概念：EMC（Edge Matrix Computing）是一个去中心化 AI 算力应用网络，同时也是一个 Depin+AI 概念的项目。EMC 将 GPU 算力资产与 AI 应用程序直接连接起来，并以低成本和便利的方式提供给普通开发人员和用户。EMC 已经完成两轮融资，Faculty Group 和 Flow Ventures 领投，金额未披露。

市值： 3000 万美元

AQTIS（AQTIS）

概念：AQTIS 是一种由 Quant-Tech 和 AI 提供支持的智能流动性协议。流动性由构建在 AQTIS 之上的 dApp 提供，致力于让普通用户也可以使用机构级投资策略，以实现稳定的收益和先进的交易。

市值： 1260 万美元

总结

从加密行业的历史周期看，牛市一般会在减半后持续 1.5 年左右，而山寨季将在减半后的几周内开启。AI 概念无疑是最值得炒作的叙事之一，结合科技行业的热点新闻，值得提前做好布局。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

Authors: Dave Mazza, Thomas DiFazio | Source: Deep Tide TechFlow The article, written by Roundhill Investments (issuer of the DRAM ETF), responds to Morningstar's caution about investing in memory chip stocks. Morningstar warns of the sector's history of boom-bust cycles, a lack of economic moats, and potential momentum-driven overvaluation. Roundhill argues the current situation is structurally different due to AI. Key points in Roundhill's rebuttal include: * **Changed Demand & Supply Dynamics:** AI infrastructure, not consumer electronics, is now the primary growth driver for memory demand. New, strict long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers reflect the high capital intensity of advanced manufacturing. * **Existence of a Moat:** High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI, has extremely high manufacturing barriers. The market is dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, with new entrants blocked by technological complexity and long lead times for equipment like ASML's EUV machines. * **Strong Fundamental Outlook:** Analyst consensus projects the three companies will rank among the world's most profitable by 2027, with combined profits of $704 billion on over $1 trillion in revenue. Their operating margins have already reached record highs. * **Valuation Re-rating:** Despite significant stock price gains, memory stocks trade at attractive valuations (e.g., a median NTM P/E of 8.37x for the DRAM ETF) relative to projected explosive EPS growth. Roundhill suggests historical valuation frameworks may no longer apply given the new profitability paradigm. Conclusion: Roundhill contends the rally is justified by fundamentals, marking a structural shift for the memory industry into a new era of sustained, AI-driven demand against constrained supply, rather than a repeat of past cycles.

marsbit7m ago

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

marsbit7m ago

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报48m ago

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报48m ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbit59m ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbit59m ago

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手1h ago

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手1h ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: Why the Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Stagnate at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb analyzes AI service pricing, particularly Anthropic's model, as a form of "tax policy" on AI labor. He observes a stark contrast: small companies (under ~150 users) benefit from low or zero marginal cost via flat-rate subscriptions, incentivizing them to maximize AI usage ("tokenmaxxing"). In contrast, large enterprises pay per-token API costs with high (e.g., 75%) markups, creating a disincentive for experimental or marginal automation. This pricing cliff at 150 users acts like a regulatory notch, potentially causing the fastest-growing AI-native companies to artificially cap their headcount to retain subsidized rates. Consequently, large-scale direct AI-for-human substitution within big corporations may not happen as expected; instead, job displacement may occur indirectly as lean, AI-heavy startups outcompete and erode their market share. The article concludes that token pricing, though not designed as such, functions as a powerful de facto tax policy shaping company structure and automation incentives.

链捕手1h ago

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: Why the Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Stagnate at 149 Employees

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow