以太坊基金会再卖 1 万枚 ETH，BitMine 场外接盘，说好的「不再卖币」呢？

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-27Last updated on 2026-04-27

作者:克洛德,深潮 TechFlow

深潮导读:以太坊基金会 4 月 24 日以均价 2,387 美元完成 10,000 ETH 的 OTC 出售,总金额约 2,387 万美元,买方为 Tom Lee 旗下的 BitMine。这是 EF 今年第三次大规模卖币操作,但买方正在以每周数万枚的速度囤积 ETH,目标直指流通量的 5%。在 Kelp 漏洞引发 DeFi 史上最大救援行动的同一周卖币,基金会的时机选择再次招致社区批评。

以太坊基金会的卖币节奏没有停下来的迹象。

4 月 24 日,基金会在 X 平台宣布,以均价 2,387 美元完成 10,000 ETH 的场外交易(OTC),总金额约 2,387 万美元。交易对手方为 BitMine Immersion Technologies(NYSE: BMNR),链上交易从基金会的 Safe 多签地址(0x9fC3dc011b461664c835F2527fffb1169b3C213e)发出。据基金会声明,所得资金将用于协议研发、生态系统建设和社区资助。

这笔交易的背景颇为微妙:同一周,DeFi 行业正全力应对 Kelp DAO 的 2.92 亿美元漏洞危机,Aave 联合十余家协议发起「DeFi United」救援基金筹集 10 万枚 ETH。基金会在此期间选择卖币而非参与救援,触发了又一轮社区不满。

2026 年第三次大额卖币,单次规模创年内新高

这并非孤立事件。回溯 2026 年以来,基金会已完成至少三次大规模 ETH 变现操作:

3 月 14 日,基金会通过 OTC 向 BitMine 出售 5,000 ETH,均价约 2,043 美元,总额约 1,021 万美元。4 月 8 日,基金会通过 CoWSwap 的 TWAP 功能(时间加权平均价格,将大单拆分为多笔小额交易以降低市场冲击)将 5,000 ETH 转换为约 1,110 万 DAI 稳定币,当时 ETH 价格约 2,220 美元。4 月 24 日这笔 10,000 ETH 的 OTC 交易,是年内单次最大规模操作。

三笔交易合计卖出 20,000 ETH,总价值约 4,518 万美元。

再往前看,据 Spot On Chain 数据,2024 年全年基金会共卖出约 4,466 枚 ETH,总额 1,261 万美元,均价 2,823 美元,分 32 笔完成。其中 15 笔发生在 ETH 价格阶段性高点附近,基金会因此被社区戏称为「逃顶大师」。

2026 年的变化在于:卖出规模显著放大,从 2024 年每次 100 枚的「零售式」卖出,跳升到单笔 5,000 至 10,000 枚的机构级别。这与基金会 2025 年 6 月发布的国库管理政策一致。该政策规定年度运营支出为国库总值的 15%,同时维持 2.5 年的法币运营缓冲。当法币储备低于缓冲目标时,自动触发 ETH 出售。

买方 BitMine:持仓近 500 万枚 ETH,目标 5% 流通量

交易对手方 BitMine 的存在,让这笔卖出多了一层值得关注的含义。

BitMine 由 Fundstrat 创始人 Tom Lee 担任董事长,2025 年 6 月通过 2.5 亿美元定增正式启动 ETH 国库策略。截至 4 月 24 日,BitMine 持有约 497 万枚 ETH,占 ETH 总流通量的 4.12%,总资产约 129 亿美元,是全球最大的 ETH 企业国库,仅次于 Strategy(原 MicroStrategy)的 BTC 持仓位居全球第二大加密货币企业国库。

BitMine 的买入节奏极为激进。据 CoinDesk 报道,仅 4 月第三周,BitMine 就购入 101,627 枚 ETH(约 2.3 亿美元),为 2026 年以来最大单周买入量。公司目标是持有 ETH 流通量的 5%(约 600 万枚),目前完成度约 81%。其中约 333 万枚 ETH 已质押,年化质押收入约 2.21 亿美元。

Tom Lee 在 2 月 ETH 跌破 2,000 美元、BitMine 账面浮亏约 80 亿美元时仍坚持增持,并公开表示 ETH 处于「迷你加密寒冬的最后阶段」。4 月 13 日,他将 ETH 称为「战时价值储存资产」。

换言之,基金会这 10,000 枚 ETH 并未流入公开市场,而是直接进入了一个明确表态长期持有、且正在以远超基金会卖出速度买入的机构手中。从供应结构角度看,这笔 OTC 交易的实际市场冲击接近于零。

质押 7 万枚 ETH 之后,为什么还在卖?

今年 2 月 24 日,基金会宣布启动 70,000 枚 ETH 的质押计划,到 4 月 3 日基本完成,质押总量约 69,500 枚 ETH,按当时价格计约 1.43 亿美元。按 2.7%至 3.8%的年化质押收益率计算,每年可产生约 390 万至 540 万美元的收入。

社区一度将此解读为「基金会不再需要卖币了」。Reddit 上甚至出现了「基金会已经停止卖币」的讨论帖。但随后 3 月的 OTC 交易和 4 月 8 日的 CoWSwap 转换迅速打破了这一幻想。

算术很简单:基金会 2025 年第一季度的拨款支出为 3,260 万美元,折合约 14,700 枚 ETH。质押年收入 390 万至 540 万美元,仅能覆盖约一个季度拨款的三分之一。4 月 8 日那笔 1,110 万美元的转换,也只相当于单季度拨款的 33%。质押和 DeFi 借贷改善了国库灵活性,但远不足以取代直接卖币。

「逃顶大师」名号背后:EF 卖币与 ETH 价格的历史关联

基金会卖币与 ETH 价格之间的关系,是加密社区经久不衰的讨论话题。

据 CoinGecko 今年 3 月发布的研究报告,该机构分析了 2017 年 10 月至 2025 年 1 月间基金会所有超过 100 枚 ETH 的链上转账。结论是:30 天滚动相关性主要分布在 -0.3 至 0.5 之间,属于弱相关到中等相关。短期(3 天)相关性波动极大,从 -0.999 到 +0.999 都有,更多反映的是市场情绪而非基金会卖出行为本身的影响。

但几个具体案例仍给社区留下了深刻印象。2017 年 12 月基金会集中卖出后,ETH 从 850 美元峰值回调近 40%至 520 美元。2023 年 5 月,基金会向 Kraken 交易所转入 15,000 枚 ETH,当时 ETH 价格随后下跌约 6%。2024 年的 32 笔交易中,链上分析师 Spot On Chain 标注其中 15 笔发生在阶段性高点附近。

截至发稿,ETH 报价约 2,328 美元,较 2025 年 8 月创下的历史高点 4,897 美元回落约 52%,在 2,500 美元关键阻力位下方盘整。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit7m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit7m ago

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

The article posits that the global economy is transitioning into a new phase of infrastructure investment. Capital, facing slowing traditional growth engines, is flowing towards emerging foundational systems. This includes space infrastructure (exemplified by SpaceX), AI computing power, satellite networks, data centers, and global payment systems. A key driver is a potential new commodity supercycle fueled by industrial demand from these sectors. Concurrently, the role of blockchain is evolving from speculative assets to a critical settlement layer for the future economy. Digital assets like XRP and XLM, focused on payments and interoperability, are highlighted as potential rails for cross-border settlement, tokenized assets, and machine-to-machine (AI Agent) transactions. The narrative connects figures like Ripple's Jed McCaleb to space ventures, suggesting convergence. The argument emphasizes a shift from speculative narratives to utility-driven value. As AI and space commerce generate new economic activity, and regulatory clarity improves, blockchain networks may underpin real-time value transfer. The conclusion urges investors to consider which networks will form the backbone of this integrated next-generation economic infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow