War With Iran May Spark Federal Reserve Intervention, Arthur Hayes Says

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-02Last updated on 2026-03-02

Abstract

Crypto exchange BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes argues that U.S. military intervention in Iran could lead to Federal Reserve monetary easing, which may boost Bitcoin and crypto prices. Drawing on historical patterns since 1985, Hayes notes that past U.S. military actions in the Middle East—such as the Gulf War and post-9/11 operations—were often followed by Fed rate cuts or increased money supply. He suggests that if President Trump continues extensive military engagement in Iran, the Fed may loosen its tight monetary policy, driving capital into risk assets like Bitcoin. While current markets show limited panic, Hayes advises investors to wait for clear Fed action before making significant crypto moves.

Iran and the Middle East are on fire again. US and Israeli forces launched a series of airstrikes on Iran over the weekend, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei — a development that sent shockwaves through global markets and sparked fresh debate about what comes next for the US economy. And amid all the chaos, one prominent voice in the crypto world is already drawing a straight line from the bombing runs to Bitcoin prices.

Arthur Hayes Makes His Case

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of crypto exchange BitMEX, published a blog post this week arguing that US military action in the Middle East has a historical pattern — and that pattern tends to be good for crypto.

His reasoning goes back decades. According to Hayes, every sitting US president since 1985 has sent forces into the Middle East. Each time, the Federal Reserve followed by cutting interest rates or pumping more money into the financial system to help cover the costs.

A quote by Arthur Hayes on his blog post.

The Gulf War in 1990. The aftermath of the September 11 attacks in 2001. The troop surge in Afghanistan in 2009. Each episode, Hayes argues, came with a looser money supply.

His conclusion: if US President Donald Trump keeps spending heavily on what Hayes calls “Iranian nation-building,” the Fed may eventually feel pressure to ease up on its current tight monetary stance. That, in turn, could send money flowing into riskier assets — including Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

BTCUSD now trading at $65,919. Chart: TradingView

Iran-US War: Markets Stay Calm For Now

So far, the markets aren’t panicking. Stock futures dipped only slightly when trading opened Monday. Oil prices spiked at first, then pulled back, erasing nearly half the early gains. The S&P 500 shed less than 1%. Financial newsletter The Kobeissi Letter was blunt about it — this was no doomsday open.

Crypto social media told a different story in tone, if not in substance. Reports say mentions of “World War 3” spiked across platforms over the weekend, according to data from analytics firm Santiment.

But those numbers were still well below the levels recorded last June, when a prior round of Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites led to nearly two weeks of direct conflict between the two countries.

A Pattern Worth Watching

Hayes himself is urging caution for now. He admits there’s no way to know how long Trump will stay committed to a costly military campaign in Iran, or how much market pain the administration can stomach before pulling back.

His advice to crypto investors is to wait — specifically for a concrete Fed rate cut or money-printing signal before making big moves.

“The time to back up the truck and buy Bitcoin,” he wrote, is right after the Fed acts, not before.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QAccording to Arthur Hayes, what is the historical pattern of the Federal Reserve's response to US military action in the Middle East?

AAccording to Arthur Hayes, the historical pattern is that the Federal Reserve has followed US military action in the Middle East by cutting interest rates or pumping more money into the financial system to help cover the costs.

QWhat specific event over the weekend is cited as the catalyst for the current market discussion?

AThe catalyst was a series of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran over the weekend, which killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

QWhat is Arthur Hayes' main investment advice for crypto investors regarding the current situation?

AHis advice is to wait for a concrete Fed rate cut or money-printing signal before making big moves, and to buy Bitcoin right after the Fed acts, not before.

QHow did the markets initially react to the news of the airstrikes, according to The Kobeissi Letter?

AThe markets did not panic. Stock futures dipped only slightly, oil prices spiked but then pulled back erasing nearly half their gains, the S&P 500 was down less than 1%, and Bitcoin turned positive on the day.

QWhat does Arthur Hayes suggest could be the ultimate result of continued US spending on 'Iranian nation-building'?

AHe suggests that continued heavy spending could pressure the Federal Reserve to ease its tight monetary stance, which in turn could send money flowing into riskier assets like Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Related Reads

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit35m ago

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit35m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit56m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片