Solana processes 8x transactions more than BNB Chain – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

While the broader crypto market moved sideways in February 2026, Solana's on-chain activity surged, processing 3.4 billion transactions—an 11% increase from January. This volume was eight times greater than that of the next largest network, BNB Chain, which handled 424 million transactions. Although Ethereum's mainnet saw only 62 million transactions, its Layer-2 networks like Base and Arbitrum absorbed significant activity. Solana also saw strong institutional support with nearly $950 million in net inflows into its ETFs. Despite a 12% monthly price decline to around $90, realized loss data suggests the worst of the selling pressure may be over, with the market entering a more stable phase.

While the broader crypto market spent February 2026 moving sideways amid global uncertainty, one ecosystem seemed to follow a different path.

New data from DeFi Dev Corp. (DFDV) shows that Solana [SOL] processed over 3.4 billion transactions in February, marking an 11% increase compared to January.

This is noteworthy because during the same period, major networks like Ethereum [ETH] and Bitcoin [BTC] saw activity slow down as market sentiment weakened.

How are other chains performing?

Following behind Solana is the second-largest network, BNB Chain, which handled around 424 million transactions.

This means that Solana processed about eight times more activity than its closest competitor, dwarfing other networks’ on-chain activity.

The data also reveals an important trend within the Ethereum ecosystem wherein Ethereum’s main network recorded only 62 million transactions, placing it near the bottom of the list.

Is Ethereum in trouble?

Even though Ethereum’s main network saw significantly fewer transactions, this does not mean the ecosystem as a whole is declining.

Instead, much of the activity has moved to Layer-2 networks, which offer lower costs and faster transactions.

For example, Base, the Layer-2 network backed by Coinbase, processed 316 million transactions, showing strong retail activity. Meanwhile, Arbitrum recorded 123 million, and Optimism recorded 68 million, and continued to see stable usage.

This suggests that Ethereum’s biggest competitor may not be another Layer-1 chain. Instead, its own scaling networks are gradually absorbing most of the activity, though even these networks still fall far behind Solana’s transaction volume.

Solana witnsses strong institutional push

Beyond network activity, Solana also saw strong support from institutional investors.

Since their launch, Spot Solana ETFs have attracted around $950 million in net inflows with mostly inflow streaks, according to data from Farside Investors.

Meanwhile, on the price front, like many assets that struggled to find direction in February, SOL too witnessed a monthly decline of over 12%, but at press time, it traded around $90.09, rising 7.46% within 24 hours.

Moreover, this coincided with AMBCrypto’s report about Solana holding ~53% of the $15.34 billion USDC supply, making it one of the largest hubs for stablecoin activity.

What is the data saying?

According to Santiment data, Solana’s Net Realized Profit/Loss remained largely negative throughout late January and February, with most bars turning red. This signals that many holders were selling their tokens at a loss as prices declined.

Furthermore, a major spike in early February shows losses nearing $1.3 billion, suggesting a wave of panic selling as SOL dropped sharply from around $140 to below $90.

Since then, the size of the loss bars has gradually decreased, indicating that selling pressure is easing as the price stabilizes between $80 and $90.

This trend suggests that much of the forced selling may already have occurred, with the market entering a more stable phase.

Yet, despite the strong numbers, an important question remains: can this momentum continue in the months ahead, or will market conditions begin to slow it down?


Final Summary

  • Processing 3.4 billion transactions in a single month places Solana far ahead of competing blockchains in raw activity.
  • Realized loss data shows that much of the panic selling may have already occurred, with selling pressure gradually easing as the price stabilizes.

Related Questions

QHow many transactions did Solana process in February 2026, and what was the percentage increase compared to January?

ASolana processed over 3.4 billion transactions in February 2026, marking an 11% increase compared to January.

QAccording to the article, how many more transactions did Solana process than its closest competitor, BNB Chain?

ASolana processed about eight times more transactions than BNB Chain, handling over 3.4 billion compared to BNB Chain's 424 million.

QWhat reason is given for Ethereum's mainnet having relatively low transaction numbers, and which Layer-2 networks are mentioned as handling significant volume?

AThe article states that much of Ethereum's activity has moved to Layer-2 networks, which offer lower costs and faster transactions. The Layer-2 networks mentioned are Base (316M transactions), Arbitrum (123M), and Optimism (68M).

QWhat was the net inflow amount for Spot Solana ETFs since their launch, according to data from Farside Investors?

ASince their launch, Spot Solana ETFs attracted around $950 million in net inflows.

QWhat does the negative Net Realized Profit/Loss data for Solana signal, and what does the decreasing size of the loss bars indicate?

AThe negative Net Realized Profit/Loss data signals that many holders were selling their SOL tokens at a loss as prices declined. The decreasing size of the loss bars indicates that selling pressure is easing as the price stabilizes.

Related Reads

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit26m ago

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit26m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit46m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit46m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片