# LIBRA Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "LIBRA", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手07/06 14:28

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手07/06 14:28

They Waited 7 Years for This Money

The article discusses the significant drop in share price of Circle, known as the "first stablecoin stock," triggered by the announcement of a new alliance including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, IBM, and Ripple. This alliance plans to launch Open USD, a USD stablecoin, later this year. Key to the market reaction is Open USD's plan to distribute reserve-generated profits to its adopters, directly challenging Circle's core revenue model from USDC's reserve interest. The piece draws a parallel to Facebook's 2019 Libra (later Diem) project, which involved many of the same companies. Libra failed due to regulatory pressure, its association with Facebook's controversial reputation, and overly ambitious global currency narratives. However, the underlying desire of these major financial and tech firms to create a new digital payment infrastructure persisted. Over seven years, the landscape changed: clearer US stablecoin regulations (GENIUS Act), mature blockchain infrastructure, and companies gaining practical experience with crypto payments. Open USD presents a more modest, compliance-focused narrative—a settlement tool and enterprise payment rail rather than a revolutionary global currency. While the new alliance poses a serious threat to Circle's profitability and exclusivity, it faces challenges typical of large consortia: slow decision-making and complex profit-sharing. USDC's established liquidity, trust, and integrations provide Circle with significant defenses. The market's reaction is seen partly as an emotional overreaction but also a necessary reevaluation of Circle's business model from a unique "stablecoin era ticket" to a "strong issuer" in a competitive commodity market. Ultimately, the core ambition from the Libra era remains: to digitize the movement of dollar value on the internet and capture the adjacent commercial opportunities. The lesson learned is to pursue this goal not as a high-profile, platform-led revolution, but as a quiet, utility-focused infrastructure play.

marsbit07/01 10:41

They Waited 7 Years for This Money

marsbit07/01 10:41

Post a Tweet for $5 Million? The Price Tag for a President's Endorsement of a Meme Coin Exposed

Argentine President Javier Milei is accused of accepting a $5 million bribe to promote the meme token LIBRA on his X (formerly Twitter) account, according to a report by local media El Destape. The allegation is based on evidence recovered from the phone of a crypto lobbyist, Mauricio Novelli, who represented KIP Protocol, the entity behind LIBRA. The scandal erupted after Milei posted a tweet on February 15, 2025, endorsing LIBRA as a project aimed at supporting Argentine entrepreneurs. The token's market cap surged to $4.56 billion within 30 minutes, but it collapsed after insiders executed a "rug pull," cashing out over $100 million. Milei later deleted the tweet, claiming he was misled and that the post was intended to support private enterprise. Investigators uncovered a purported agreement between Milei and Hayden Davis, the alleged mastermind behind the scheme. The deal involved a $5 million payment—$1.5 million upfront, another $1.5 million after Milei publicly endorsed Davis as an advisor, and a final $2 million for a blockchain consulting contract. Phone records also showed frequent communication between Novelli and Milei’s office around the time of the tweet. Despite initial investigations by anti-corruption offices and Congress, no conclusive action was taken. The report suggests Milei was aware of the token’s speculative nature but proceeded for financial gain. Davis defended the scheme in an interview, arguing that meme token trading is a “casino” where such practices are expected. The incident highlights growing concerns over the ethical boundaries and regulatory challenges within the crypto industry.

比推03/17 12:11

Post a Tweet for $5 Million? The Price Tag for a President's Endorsement of a Meme Coin Exposed

比推03/17 12:11

活动图片