Yen Stablecoins: Can Japan Leverage the Global $40 Trillion On-Chain Arbitrage Trade?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-05Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-05

Abstrak

The Japanese government and major financial institutions, led by Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s national Web3 strategy, are pushing to introduce a compliant yen-backed stablecoin to reclaim influence in the crypto space, currently dominated by dollar stablecoins like USDT and USDC. The strategy, spearheaded by financial giant SBI Group in partnership with Startale Labs, aims to replicate Japan’s traditional role in global "yen carry trades" — where investors borrow low-yield yen to invest in higher-yielding assets — on the blockchain. The planned stablecoin, JPYSC, would enable 24/7 leveraged trading in DeFi and serve as a settlement layer for tokenized assets like stocks and real-world assets (RWA). However, Japan faces significant hurdles: limited liquidity of existing yen stablecoins (only around $20M in circulation), unclear regulatory treatment of stablecoin reserves and capital requirements, and high crypto taxation (currently 55%) that stifles retail participation. Despite plans to reduce taxes and reclassify crypto as a financial product, progress has been slow. If successful, Japan could position the yen as a core non-dollar base asset in the growing $40 trillion on-chain credit and arbitrage market, competing with US dollar stablecoin dominance and other regions like Europe (under MiCA) and the UAE. The effort represents a strategic move to extend Japan’s monetary influence into the digital economy.

While the global stablecoin market is dominated by dollar-denominated assets (USDT, USDC), a heavyweight player from the traditional financial world is attempting to reclaim its voice on-chain.

Japan, an economy with the world's third-largest reserve currency (the Yen), is launching an ambitious on-chain movement led by its government and financial giants. The core weapon is the Yen stablecoin.

This is not just about payments; it's a deeper game that could reshape global on-chain capital movement: to fully replicate the "Yen carry trade," which has dominated the traditional foreign exchange market for decades, onto the blockchain.

"The Sleeping Giant" and Its Web3 Ambition

Japan is the world's fourth-largest economy, and the Yen accounts for 5.82% of global foreign exchange reserves, making it a systemically important currency second only to the US dollar and the Euro. Its long-maintained ultra-low interest rates have made the Yen one of the most trusted "funding currencies" for global investors: investors borrow low-cost Yen, convert it into higher-yielding currencies for investment, and profit from the interest rate differential.

However, in the blockchain economy, this core status of the Yen is almost invisible. This situation began to change rapidly after Sanae Takaichi became Prime Minister in 2025 and explicitly made "making Japan a Web3 hub" a national strategy.

One of the core policies is to promote the institutionalization of cryptocurrencies, with stablecoins and security tokens (RWA) listed as priority development items.

SBI's "National Strategy" Chess Game

SBI Group, one of Japan's largest financial groups, has become a key executor of this national strategy. Its founder, Yoshitaka Kitao, a legendary figure who co-founded SoftBank's financial business with Masayoshi Son, is transforming SBI into an infrastructure provider for Japan's on-chain finance.

The Strium blockchain, developed by SBI in collaboration with the Startale Group, targets the institutional market: to become the settlement layer for tokenized stocks and RWA. However, to achieve true on-chain stocks (including dividends and voting rights), a key prerequisite is needed: a compliant Yen stablecoin for paying on-chain dividends and settlements.

This is the strategic significance of the Yen stablecoin. It is not just for domestic payments but to enable a massive global strategy: the on-chain Yen carry trade.

In the traditional world, this process is time-consuming and limited by business hours. On-chain, it can theoretically be completed 24/7, almost instantly: investors collateralize assets to borrow Yen stablecoins, convert them into US dollar stablecoins, and then invest in DeFi protocols to earn higher yields. This would introduce the vast global institutional demand for Yen borrowing into the decentralized financial system.

The Startale Group has announced that it will launch JPYSC, a Yen stablecoin specifically designed for this purpose, in the second quarter of 2026. Its founder, Sota Watanabe, revealed that they have been in talks with several top US financial institutions, which have shown strong interest in using on-chain Yen for arbitrage and swap trades.

Triple Challenges: Liquidity, Regulation, and Retail Investors

Despite the grand blueprint, Japan's path to becoming an on-chain financial center still faces three major obstacles:

  • Liquidity Dilemma: The market capitalization of existing Yen stablecoins (like JPYC) is only about $20 million, insufficient to support large-scale arbitrage trading. The participation of giants like SBI or a joint issuance by the three megabanks—MUFG, Mizuho, and SMBC—is needed to provide sufficient depth.
  • Regulatory Clarity Pending: How stablecoins are accounted for on bank balance sheets and the capital requirements are still being refined in Japan and globally. The US SEC recently significantly reduced the capital discount rate for broker-dealers holding stablecoins from 100% to 2%, providing an important reference for the industry.
  • Retail Absence: A high cryptocurrency gains tax rate of 55% severely dampens the vitality of Japan's domestic retail market. Although the government plans to reduce the tax rate to 20% and reclassify cryptocurrencies as financial products, the process is slow. Sota Watanabe stated bluntly: "The Japanese government is moving very slowly... To catch up, implementing tax reductions by 2027 is necessary."
A Race for Financial Sovereignty and Efficiency

Japan's Yen stablecoin strategy is essentially a race for financial sovereignty and efficiency. As the US quietly expands its on-chain territory through dollar stablecoins, Europe builds a unified market through MiCA, and the UAE positions Abu Dhabi as a core "compliant settlement layer," Japan must find its place.

The path it has chosen heavily relies on its traditional financial strengths: leveraging its massive international Yen reserves and mature financial institutions as a pivot, and targeting RWA and institutional arbitrage trading as entry points, attempting to rebuild a parallel capital market on-chain with the Yen as a key funding currency.

The outcome of this race depends not only on technology or the success of a single stablecoin but also on the speed of regulatory innovation, the determination of traditional giants, and the ability to awaken the "sleeping" domestic retail force. If successful, the on-chain version of the global $40 trillion credit and arbitrage market will, for the first time, welcome a powerful non-dollar cornerstone asset.

Japan's Web3 ambition now hinges on this small, Yen-pegged digital token.

*This content is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. The market carries risks, and investment requires caution.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat is the core strategic goal behind Japan's push for a yen-backed stablecoin?

AJapan's core strategic goal is to reclaim its role as a major global financial player in the blockchain economy by replicating the traditional 'yen carry trade' on-chain. This involves using a compliant yen stablecoin to facilitate 24/7, near-instantaneous borrowing of yen to exchange for higher-yielding assets (like USD stablecoins) in DeFi protocols, thereby channeling massive global institutional demand for yen lending into the decentralized financial system.

QWhich Japanese financial giant is a key player in executing this national Web3 strategy, and what infrastructure are they building?

ASBI Group, one of Japan's largest financial groups, is a key executor of this strategy. They are collaborating with Startale Group to develop the Strium blockchain, which is designed to be an institutional-grade settlement layer for tokenized stocks and Real World Assets (RWA).

QWhat are the three main challenges facing Japan's ambition to become a chain-based financial center?

AThe three main challenges are: 1) Liquidity: The current yen stablecoin market is too small (e.g., JPYC's ~$20M market cap) to support large-scale arbitrage; major banks need to issue their own. 2) Regulation: The regulatory framework for how stablecoins are treated on bank balance sheets and their capital requirements is still evolving. 3) Retail Participation: A high 55% cryptocurrency tax rate severely dampens domestic retail market activity, and proposed tax reductions are progressing slowly.

QHow does the traditional 'yen carry trade' work, and how would it be different on the blockchain?

AIn the traditional world, the yen carry trade involves investors borrowing low-cost yen, converting it into a higher-yielding currency, and investing it to profit from the interest rate differential. This process is time-consuming and limited by banking hours. On the blockchain, this process could be completed 24/7, almost instantly: investors would collateralize assets to borrow yen stablecoins, convert them to dollar stablecoins, and then deposit them into DeFi protocols to earn yield.

QBeyond payment convenience, what is the broader significance of a yen stablecoin for Japan's financial sovereignty?

AThe significance extends beyond payments to a competition for financial sovereignty and efficiency. As the US expands its on-chain influence via dollar stablecoins and Europe builds a unified market with MiCA, Japan is leveraging its traditional financial advantages—its status as a major reserve currency and its mature financial institutions—to build a parallel on-chain capital market where the yen is a key funding currency. This aims to secure Japan's position in the future of global finance.

Bacaan Terkait

GensynAI : Jangan Biarkan AI Mengulangi Kesalahan Internet

Beberapa bulan terakhir, banyak talenta dari industri kripto beralih ke AI karena pesatnya perkembangan industri kecerdasan buatan. Para peneliti yang bergerak di kedua bidang ini terus mengeksplorasi satu pertanyaan yang belum terjawab: **Bisakah blockchain menjadi bagian dari infrastruktur AI?** Proyek yang menggabungkan AI dan Crypto, seperti AI Agent, on-chain reasoning, pasar data, dan penyewaan daya komputasi, telah banyak bermunculan. Namun, sebagian besar masih berada di "lapisan aplikasi AI" dan belum membentuk closed-loop bisnis yang nyata. Berbeda dengan itu, **Gensyn** justru menyasar lapisan paling inti dan mahal dalam industri AI: **pelatihan model**. Gensyn bertujuan untuk mengorganisir sumber daya GPU yang tersebar secara global menjadi jaringan pelatihan AI terbuka. Pengembang dapat mengirimkan tugas pelatihan, node menyediakan daya komputasi, dan jaringan bertugas memverifikasi hasil pelatihan serta mendistribusikan insentif. Nilai utama di balik ini bukan semata-mata "desentralisasi", melainkan solusi atas masalah mendesak dalam industri AI: **sumber daya komputasi (GPU) yang semakin terkonsentrasi di tangan segelintir raksasa teknologi.** Kelangkaan pasokan H100, kenaikan harga layanan cloud, dan persaingan ketat untuk mengunci sumber daya komputasi menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan GPU kini menjadi penentu kecepatan pengembangan AI, terutama di era model besar (large models). **Mengapa Gensyn Menarik Perhatian?** 1. **Menyasar Lapisan Infrastruktur Inti AI:** Gensyn langsung masuk ke dalam proses pelatihan model, bagian yang paling menantang secara teknis dan paling banyak mengonsumsi sumber daya. Ini adalah lapisan yang mudah membentuk hambatan platform (platform壁垒). Jika jaringan pelatihannya mencapai skala, ia berpotensi menjadi pintu masuk penting bagi pengembangan AI di masa depan. 2. **Menawarkan Model Kolaborasi Komputasi yang Lebih Terbuka:** Berbeda dengan ketergantungan pada platform cloud terpusat yang biayanya terus naik, Gensyn mengusung model yang memanfaatkan GPU menganggur dan menjadwalkan sumber daya komputasi secara dinamis. Ini dapat meningkatkan efisiensi penggunaan daya komputasi secara keseluruhan dan mengurangi hambatan inovasi bagi tim AI kecil-menengah. 3. **Tingkat Kesulitan Teknis sebagai Keunggulan:** Tantangan sebenarnya bukan sekadar menghubungkan GPU, tetapi **cara memverifikasi hasil pelatihan, memastikan kejujuran node, dan menjaga keandalan pelatihan di lingkungan terdistribusi.** Gensyn fokus pada solusi teknis ini (seperti mekanisme verifikasi probabilistik, model distribusi tugas), menjadikannya lebih mirip perusahaan infrastruktur teknologi mendalam (deep tech). 4. **Memiliki Closed-Loop Bisnis Nyata:** Kebutuhan akan pelatihan AI adalah pasar nyata yang terus berkembang, dengan celah pasokan GPU yang berkelanjutan. Gensyn tidak sekadar menambahkan blockchain untuk kepentingannya sendiri, tetapi menjawab kebutuhan industri akan sistem penjadwalan sumber daya yang lebih fleksibel dan terbuka. Singkatnya, batas antara Crypto (sistem finansial) dan AI (sistem teknologi) semakin kabur. AI membutuhkan koordinasi sumber daya, mekanisme insentif, dan kolaborasi global—hal-hal yang menjadi keahlian Crypto. Gensyn mewakili upaya untuk membuka akses kemampuan pelatihan, yang selama ini dikuasai sedikit perusahaan besar, menjadi sistem yang lebih terbuka dan dapat dikolaborasikan. Inisiatif ini tidak lagi sekadar cerita konsep, tetapi berkembang menuju infrastruktur AI nyata, di mana perusahaan paling bernilai di era AI sering kali lahir dari lapisan infrastruktur.

marsbit9j yang lalu

GensynAI : Jangan Biarkan AI Mengulangi Kesalahan Internet

marsbit9j yang lalu

Mengapa AI China Berkembang Begitu Cepat? Jawabannya Tersembunyi di Dalam Laboratorium

Pengarang mencatat bahwa laboratorium AI China telah menjadi kekuatan yang semakin sulit diabaikan dalam kompetisi model besar global. Keunggulannya tidak hanya terletak pada banyaknya talenta, kemampuan rekayasa yang kuat, dan iterasi cepat, tetapi juga berasal dari cara organisasi yang sangat realistis: lebih banyak fokus pada pembuatan model daripada konsep, lebih menekankan eksekusi tim daripada individu bintang, dan lebih memilih menguasai tumpukan teknologi inti sendiri daripada bergantung pada layanan eksternal. Dari kunjungan ke sejumlah laboratorium AI terkemuka China, penulis menemukan ekosistem AI China tidak sepenuhnya sama dengan AS. AS lebih menekankan orisinalitas, investasi modal, dan pengaruh ilmuwan puncak, sedangkan China lebih mahir dalam mengejar cepat arah yang sudah ada. Melalui sumber terbuka, optimasi rekayasa, dan kontribusi banyak peneliti muda, China mendorong kemampuan model ke garis depan dengan cepat. Yang paling menarik untuk diperhatikan bukanlah apakah AI China telah melampaui AS, melainkan dua jalur pengembangan berbeda yang terbentuk: AS lebih seperti kompetisi garis depan yang digerakkan modal dan laboratorium bintang, sedangkan China lebih seperti kompetisi industri yang didorong oleh kemampuan rekayasa, ekosistem sumber terbuka, dan kesadaran penguasaan teknologi mandiri. Ini berarti kompetisi AI di masa depan tidak hanya soal peringkat model, tetapi juga kemampuan organisasi, ekosistem pengembang, dan eksekusi industri. Perubahan nyata AI China terletak pada cara mereka berpartisipasi dalam garis depan global dengan caranya sendiri, bukan hanya meniru Silicon Valley. Penulis juga menyoroti beberapa perbedaan utama dalam ekosistem AI China: permintaan AI domestik mulai muncul, banyak pengembang terpengaruh Claude, perusahaan memiliki mentalitas kepemilikan teknologi, ada dukungan pemerintah meski skalanya belum jelas, industri data kurang berkembang dibanding Barat, dan ada kebutuhan kuat akan chip NVIDIA lebih banyak. Penutupnya menekankan pentingnya ekosistem global yang terbuka dan kolaboratif untuk menciptakan AI yang lebih aman, mudah diakses, dan bermanfaat bagi dunia.

marsbit10j yang lalu

Mengapa AI China Berkembang Begitu Cepat? Jawabannya Tersembunyi di Dalam Laboratorium

marsbit10j yang lalu

3 Tahun 5 Kali Lipat, Pabrik Kaca Berusia Satu Abad Dibangkitkan Kembali

Menurut CRU, permintaan serat optik untuk pusat data AI meningkat 75.9% per tahun, dan kesenjangan pasokan-meningkat dari 6% menjadi 15%. Harga serat optik melonjak lebih dari 3 kali lipat dalam beberapa bulan, dan kapasitas produksi tidak dapat mengimbangi. Inilah alasan NVIDIA berinvestasi di Corning dan mempercepat ekspansi kapasitas serat optik, dengan total investasi $45 miliar dalam tiga perusahaan di seluruh rantai optik. Corning, perusahaan kaca berusia 175 tahun dari New York, melihat sahamnya naik 316.81% dalam setahun terakhir, mencapai kapitalisasi pasar $160 miliar. NVIDIA memilih Corning karena keahliannya dalam serat optik khusus berkinerja tinggi yang penting untuk pusat data AI, seperti serat dengan kehilangan sinyal ultra-rendah (0.15 dB/km), kepadatan tinggi, dan ketahanan tekuk yang baik. Penghasilan Corning dari segmen komunikasi optik untuk perusahaan (Enterprise) melonjak dari $1.3 miliar pada 2023 menjadi lebih dari $3 miliar pada 2025. Perusahaan telah mengamankan kontrak pasokan jangka panjang bernilai miliaran dolar dari klien seperti Meta dan NVIDIA. Meskipun bukan produsen serat optik terbesar secara global, keunggulan teknis Corning di pasar serat canggih untuk AI, ditambah dengan investasi R&D tahunan sebesar $1 miliar, memberinya posisi unik. Percepatan adopsi teknologi **CPO (Co-Packaged Optics)** oleh NVIDIA, yang dijadwalkan mulai produksi massal pada paruh kedua 2026, menjadi katalis penting bagi permintaan serat optik premium Corning. Namun, valuasi sahamnya yang telah melonjak pesat dan potensi keterlambatan dalam eksekusi pesanan menjadi faktor risiko yang perlu diperhatikan.

marsbit11j yang lalu

3 Tahun 5 Kali Lipat, Pabrik Kaca Berusia Satu Abad Dibangkitkan Kembali

marsbit11j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片